What Do Republicans Want? - A Real Question, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times
Topic started on 11-9-2009 @ 07:15 PM by Benevolent Heretic
What Do Republicans Want? - A Real Question

What do Republicans want in the Health Insurance Reform Plan regarding illegal immigrants?

I’ve read a lot about the desire to stop the bill BECAUSE of this issue. So, my question is, “What do you want to see in the bill that would address the illegal immigrants situation”? I realize the RESULT you want is for illegal immigrants NOT to be able to buy health insurance under the Plan (and I agree), but what I’m asking is how can we achieve that goal?

As I see it, we would have to add regulations or procedures in the bill that would insure that ONLY legal citizens can buy insurance under this plan. Right? Like checking applicants’ citizenship to qualify for participation in the plan. Someone who couldn’t provide proof of citizenship would be denied the right to buy into the plan.

Are federal regulations and procedures usually included in a bill? I would think that Congress writes a bill that becomes law and then someone (a committee?) writes implementations, regulations and procedures associated with that law.

Here’s a simple example.

This is the
Law Enforcement Officers Flag Memorial Act, that provides that a US flag be flown over the Capitol in honor of deceased law enforcement officers whose family requests such.

Now, how is this implemented? How do we know these people who request such actually had an enforcement officer in their family die in the line of duty? Well, they're going to have to prove it. But the procedure for proving it is NOT included in the bill.


(b) Procedure.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment
of this Act, the Attorney General shall establish a procedure
(including any appropriate forms) by which the family of a deceased law
enforcement officer may request, and provide sufficient information to
determine such officer's eligibility
for, a Capitol-flown flag.


So, the procedure for determining eligibility is not included in the bill, it is written by the AG at a later date.

I don't know what the final health bill will look like, but The Bill I have bookmarked mentions "procedure" 28 times.

On page 69:


"(1) RULE FOR ELIGIBILITY DETERMINA-
5 TIONS.—The Secretary shall, by regulation, establish
6 rules and procedures for—
...
"(B) making determinations with respect
12 to the eligibility of individuals submitting appli-
13 cations under subparagraph (A) for payments
14 under this section and informing individuals of
15 such determinations;


On page 100:


"(2) ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL.—The term 'eligible
13 individual' means an individual who is—
14 "(A) a citizen or national of the United
15 States or an alien lawfully admitted to the
16 United States for permanent residence or an
17 alien lawfully present in the United States;
18 "(B) a qualified individual;
19 "(C) enrolled in a qualified health plan;
20 and
21 "(D) not receiving full benefits coverage
22 under a State child health plan under title XXI
23 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397aa et
24 seq.) (or a waiver of such plan).


Additionally:


21 "(g) No FEDERAL FUNDING.—Nothing in this Act
22 shall allow Federal payments for individuals who are not
23 lawfully present in the United States.
...
ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL.—The term 'eligible
13 individual' means an individual who is—
14 "(A) a citizen or national of the United
15 States or an alien lawfully admitted to the
16 United States for permanent residence or an
17 alien lawfully present in the United States;


Now, the procedure for how eligibility is to be determined is not included in the bill, but apparently will be established by the appropriate entity.

If I have misunderstood what Republicans want to be in the bill, please let me know.


reply posted on 11-9-2009 @ 07:58 PM by I_am_Spartacus
Originally posted by Remixtup
You wont find many people who identify themselves as republicans, the republicans "left" the conservatives long ago.


Good one!

As long as they PAY for it, I don't see a problem. The issue I think is they will be getting it for FREE!

I think we get rid of all forms of governmental welfare except for extreme cases. Then if an illegal still wanted to become legal, pay taxes like the rest of the citizens (well in theory) then yes they could by into a health insurance plan the government has brought the cost of down by enacting tort reform, allowing primary care physicians and even hospitals to sell their own insurance policies, allowing interstate plan purchasing, etc. The really funny thing that the democrats don't seem to grasp is the insurance companies are in bed with the politicians promoting healthcare reform HOPING they will not be hurt by it. There will not be any relinquishing of monopolies, etc, They are all there hoping to be the company that BECOMES the government healthcare company.

The free market works when the only function government plays is preventing fraud. We have a govitalist (government controlled capitalism) system right now where only the biggest survive because they get preferential laws enacted from the corrupt politicans. Of course this makes things worse and the the libs cry foul on capitalism creating more govitalism until it becomes fascism. Capitalists and capitalism, while having faults, do not create the problems we see. And don't try to tell me about the "capitalist wall street guys" scamming everyone. You're right they do scam, but they wouldn't be nearly so efficient at it if they didn't control the politicians. The free market weeds out the much of the corruption if left to work on its own without "help' from the government. I know its hard to believe because we really haven't experienced it in full.

[edit on 11-9-2009 by I_am_Spartacus]

[edit on 11-9-2009 by I_am_Spartacus]

[edit on 11-9-2009 by I_am_Spartacus]

[edit on 11-9-2009 by I_am_Spartacus]



reply posted on 11-9-2009 @ 08:04 PM by mental modulator
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic



I we gauge it by the multitude of responses the answer becomes clear...


reply posted on 11-9-2009 @ 08:50 PM by jam321
reply to post by Doc Velocity



Easy. Insist on a verification of citizenship, proof of residence, and do a thorough background check on everyone who signs up for ObamaCare.


And if this is passed with such language, do you think people will start complaining because they will have to carry papers around to prove their citizenship status?

You do realize that this will open up a whole new can of worms concerning freedom and having a national ID.

Before long you will have to prove your a citizen just to get into a government building.

Are you sure this is what you are asking for because once it is accepted it will be extended to other areas?

Remember, a social security number was only required for one thing in the beginning. How many places require it now?



[edit on 11-9-2009 by jam321]


reply posted on 11-9-2009 @ 09:26 PM by drwizardphd
Originally posted by I_am_Spartacus


omission conveys inclusion, its a favorite tactic. They are not specifically excluded so they will be included


What part of


"(2) ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL.—The term 'eligible
13 individual' means an individual who is—
14 "(A) a citizen or national of the United
15 States or an alien lawfully admitted to the
16 United States for permanent residence or an
17 alien lawfully present in the United States;


do you not understand?

Where is the omission? It clearly states that you must be a lawful citizen to be eligible for the plan. There is no gray area, the wording is black and white.



Now, I know this is going to be a terribly unpopular thing to say, but I am nothing if not a realist.

Illegal immigrants are human beings just like the rest of us. Whether or not you feel they 'deserve' healthcare (not surprising as many people on this site don't even think less fortunate Americans deserve heatlhcare), they will get sick, and they will get injured.

What do you think will happen then? They will go back to Mexico (or their country of origin) to seek medical attention? They will sit in their homes and slowly die, leaving their families behind?

Of course not, they will go to the emergency room, as they have been doing for years now. They will not pay their bills, and in the long run taxpayers will foot the bill. Wouldn't it make sense to include illegal immigrants in the bill, in some form, to save taxpayer money and free up emergency rooms? It would seem like a win-win. Of course its not a perfect solution, but it is probably the best solution, both for the immigrants and for taxpaying citizens.

The way I see it, there are three options for dealing with illegal immigrants' healthcare:

1. We uphold the status quo. Illegal immigrants are unable to seek preventative care, so they almost exclusively use the emergency room. This ties up ER services from treating actual emergencies, and ends up costing hospitals an enormous amount of money which in turn burdens the taxpayers.

2. We change the laws and force emergency rooms to stop helping illegal immigrants altogether, and they die in the streets. (If you actually believe this to be an equitable solution, I would suggest that you don't deserve to call yourself a human being).

3. We figure out some method of providing illegal immigrants with health coverage, so that they can seek preventative care and explore other forms of medical attention outside of simply flooding the ER's. This cost will be carried by taxpayers, of course, but ultimately at a smaller cost than we are already paying for the current ER usage.

I'm just spitballing here, if anyone has a better idea I'd love to hear it. None of this really matters, as the bill being proposed by Obama upholds the current status quo anyway. Illegal immigrants will not receive any form of health coverage, the wording in the bill is very clear on that. They will continue to use the ER, it will cause inconveniences and probably medical complications for taxpayers seeking to use the ER, and it will cost us more money in the long run.


reply posted on 11-9-2009 @ 09:32 PM by jam321
reply to post by Doc Velocity



These "papers" prove that we are qualified to exercise the privileges to drive, receive government assistance, and are responsible enough to cover damages to other people's property.


Yes, and these papers can also be falsified. Do these papers prove citizenship in your eyes? If they do then people should get off Obama's back about not being a citizen. He has a driver license and social security card as well as many illegals who aren't citizens.


reply posted on 11-9-2009 @ 09:35 PM by greeneyedleo
reply to post by Doc Velocity



Though I agree with your stance, that is impossible to force. All of those documents are easily faked. Although the real ID scares most people, at the end of the day, it seems the only identification that may work in cases such as this. Eventually someone will figure a way to make fake ones.....but what other solution do we have to ensure that people are who they say they are?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^