interesting that at 10:30 a.m. pst. 9/11/09 the examiner article "has not been published yet", that is what the referenced site said.

referenced source seems to come later...

An NSA and a Lawyer, man oh man, these guys are known for promoting the truth, so I'll buy it.

Interesting listen non the less.

NSA and a lawyer....exactly.

I'll keep an open mind as usual, but I trust either as far as I can throw em.

I just posted the thread and you had the time to go through all the information? Can you at least digest the material (6 hr interview) and then start bashing and scoffing.

p.s. Was referring to Virginiagreen



[edit on 11-9-2009 by Telos]

If you have glimpsed at this man's paper, you will realize he is not to be trusted. I have listened to this whole interview and i dont believe a word of it. Disinfo all the way. If this doesnt discredit other whistleblowers i dont know what will.

No wonder the disclosure projects wants nothing to do with him!

EDIT: I am subscribed to Jessica and have listened to this before

[edit on 11-9-2009 by Sloppy]

Fixed link (sometimes you have to use tinyurl for examiner articles):

/l853hy

Very interesting, but difficult to believe, but I will give it a listen out of pure curiosity.

Actually I think it was I who made the first statement about them being a lawyer and NSA. This wasn't meant to bash on your topic, just on those two careers that I have no respect for.

But that on the side, I am listening to the youtubes you linked atm and things are starting to pick up, I'll keep an open mind also and come up with my conclusion at the end of 36/36 ><

from the Examiner.com article:

'Ms. Schab continues, “During his lecture, Andy shared numerous photographic images evidencing his discovery of life on Mars, including many photos of humanoid beings, different animal species, carved statues and built structures on Mars that put him at the forefront of Mars research.' (end excerpt)

No photos, or convincing enough ones, no story. Everyone knows the entire NSA is comprised exclusively (or closely enough) of professional liars, and it's obvious how many lawyers are of the same deceptive mentality, and always have been. Heaven only knows what "reason" they have for spreading this particular disinfo, but I'd wager it's BS... Yes, I'd gladly be wrong, but this is something too huge-sounding to be able to swallow without proof.

BTW, some of have more important things to do than sit through a 6-hour interview. A synopsis of the more salient points, meaning the more convincing-SOUNDING ones, would be greatly appreciated.

Does anyone have any idea of the massive mountain of purely imagined material that certain massive intellects and imaginations can concoct, given enough time? Think Alex Collier...

Originally posted by Telos
Bashing was metaphorically. So was scoffing. I understood your stating but I still am of the opinion that first one must read the whole info, then raise questions about the veracity.

Why?

I think Easter Bunny is real.

Even if you know it isn't real.

Read this whole 300 page book discussing the Easter Bunny, THEN tell me it's fake.

Yeah right. If VirginiaGreen doesn't trust the source, she has her own reasons. They are reasonable enough to me. And there is no reason you must digest an entire 6 hour interview before you can form an opinion on it. If I knew it was by someone I didn't trust, there would be no reason to watch 6 hours of it.

As for the actual topic and your material, I haven't obviously finished it yet, but it's interesting if true and comes at a time when the new First lady of Japan says she was transported to Venus and met intelligence there as well.

Perhaps our solar system really and truly is more habitable and hospitable than we are led to believe. Or perhaps what is habitable and hospitable to us is not the same was what works for another life form on another planet.

But I do think we live in exciting times, and I do believe this may be possible. Perhaps there is all sorts of intelligence hidden right under our noses.

But OP do you have any idea about David Wilcock or Wilcox? People in the comments section on YouTube seem very convinced this is a hoax and the voice is done by someone else. Please look into this or verify your information if you can.

I hope this can at least be verified not to be a hoax, then I will continue watching 6 hours of it.

Am I the only one that thinks this sounds a lot like an episode of Stargate SG-1? AN interesting read though, just not very credible IMHO. Too bad, I hate flying commercial and this transporter, excuse me, "teleportation" room sounds like a cool alternative.

I mean you almost WANT to believe it. There has to be some reasonable explanation for our wildly scaled back program of manned space exploration.
I don't think we're on track at all for having been to the Moon starting in 1969.
Can't they just make a movie? Sounds like a great plot!