reply to post by TheCoffinman
I completely respect our troops, and the allied troops....they are only doing their jobs....being soldiers....but I think our generals and
president(s) have no freaking idea what they are doing.
We never should have gone into Iraq, but we ESPECIALLY never should have gone into Iraq while we were still fighting a war in Afghanistan.
I would still like to know what our current objectives are in Afghanistan. Are we still trying to find Osama Bin Laden after 8 years? I think if we
haven't found him after 8 years, we're not going to find him.
I'm not a soldier, but it seems pretty obvious to me that you cannot simultaneously win a war and try to be the friend of a country. You've got to
pick...one or the other. I can only imagine how WWII would have ended up if we had gone into Germany trying to fight the Nazis and trying to be a
friend of the German people at the same time. War just doesn't work that way....
Our generals are idiots if you ask me. "Going after terrorists" is no reason to invade an entire country. By doing that, we have now set a dangerous
precedence. Imagine someday, that some international eco-terrorists launches an attack on Saudi Arabia, then they come back and hide in the USA. Now
Saudia Arabia invades our country to "hunt down and find" the eco-terrorists. If the USA protests, they could say, "Hey, you did the same thing to
Afghanistan. How is this any different?" And you know what? They would be right!
Maybe those conspiracy theories that say that the Osama Bin Laden was working for the CIA was right. Maybe he was just an excuse for us to go in and
establish a western presence in the center of the middle east, so they could then use Afghanistan as a base of operations for Iraq, Iran, etc....
The whole thing is just insane.
Just curious.....how much area did the Taliban control before we went into Afghanistan?

