It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Maxmars
Putting something like this on the line takes some courage.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Following is a copy of the email I just sent to Orly Taitz:
Subject: Hi Orly, Critical new evidence of DNC coverup, could be vital to your case
Hi Orly,
First let me state I am firmly behind you all the way in your case against a would be usurper to our Presidency. And here is another breaking story you should most definitely be aware of: It is proof of a DNC conspiracy to intentionally remove the constitutional requirement clause from their final document submitted to the states. You may find a way for this to help increase the efficacy of your Keyes case.
www.rightsidenews.com...
I am the member TrueAmerican from AboveTopSecret.com and have ongoing discussions on this here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
and here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Sincerely,
TA
Originally posted by kinda kurious
Originally posted by Maxmars
Putting something like this on the line takes some courage.
So does that mean you think hoaxers are brave? I suppose counterfeiters and document forgers must equate to heros by your standards. Since when is disinfo a noble act?
Originally posted by Maxmars
....this baby is all you!
The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don't Lie
Originally posted by Electro38
So where are the "facts", and proof? Anyone here ever study science beyond high school? I'm not being sarcastic, I'm just really curious.
Why do so many seemingly intelligent people automatically believe that digital images garnered from the internet are "real", and use these images as proof?
I still haven't seen any proof that these images are real. Let's suppose they are real, untouched digital photos of US government documents, is anyone here an expert in government documents?
Also, how is it we, the members of a UFO/conspiracy web forum can easily uncover "real" gov. documents on the internet and from some guy's blog, and yet the people who have much more in resources/money and capabilities (i.e. the republicans, etc.) cannot find any of this evidence, or have no knowledge of it?
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
It doesn't take an A in high school science to figure that one out.
Just common sense. THEY are all in the same back stabbing COUNTRY CLUB.
Originally posted by space cadet
I can tell that the signatures on the first document have been superimposed onto the second document. Acually I bet a first grader could tell you that.
I would say that Shalifa's commision date expiration ( the second line in it) is completely forged as well, and the 'N' in Nancy Pelosi as well. Other than those two forgeries, the rest is an exact photocopy.