Originally posted by TrueAmerican


But operating for a minute under that hypothesis, then WHO are they planning on taking over? Pelosi? Clinton? Biden?

Biden would be ineligible, and Clinton is down the line to replace the President. It would be President Pelosi, until a new election was set up. That's scarier than the other two! That woman scares the bejeebus out of me. Her plastic surgery is not aging well, she looks like a damn raccoon.

what is the "typo" i read it through twice, the second time more carefully, and missed it? what is it? and why is it important?

Lets not forget that these letters can be made on your computer and printed off and the stamp and be bought from your local Staples store. Copying signatures is not that hard to do for someone artistically inclined.

Originally posted by AKARonco
what is the "typo" i read it through twice, the second time more carefully, and missed it? what is it? and why is it important?

Read "through" it again carefully.

I have personally never felt he was eligible to be our president. This does not surprise me nor does it surprise me that the democrats would stoop to any level to get a person of choice elected.

I am not seeing this typo

Edit: Nevermind, I found it.

I hate that my brain skims through things lol

[edit on 9/11/2009 by Lemon.Fresh]

My signatures would rarely "match-up" if a regular Joe were to compare them. It's basically a structured scribble. However, to the trained eye, there are certain points of reference - certain strokes I make with every signature that could identify whether I'd actually signed or not. It could be as simple as a serif, but it's there every time. Though if you looked at the entire signature, a regular person might not be able to gather the same name from both.

Sometimes it's how I hold the pen. Sometimes it's how large of a signature line I have to work with. Many times the "letters" appear completely different from signature to signature, but if you know the strokes to look for, it's easy to identify my mark.

[edit on 11-9-2009 by tyranny22]

Here is a comparison of the lower case "o" in Pelosi, I won't even add a comment about it:

If this is evidence of a greater conspiracy which ends with Clinton becoming president and the PTB in ultimate control of both parties, ,then that would certainly explain why both the Clinton camp and the Mccain camp did not touch the Obama eligibility issue.

This is of course a giant leap from a simple question of Obama's eligibility to a great "plot" of removal, creating riots and ultimately martial law.
(I still don't get what purpose martial law would serve)

Anyway, it is fun/interesting to speculate. Much like the speculation of Aliens being here. Hey maybe Aliens are actually the PTB.

But seriously there is quite obviously something amiss with regard to Obama.

The only thing I find odd about the omission is why would they need to omit it any way? I mean, if he's not eligible and they knew it, but were willing to lie to get him through why not leave the that last clause on the document.

Just seems that if they are going to hide his birthright, use a false BC, get false SS#'s for him they wouldn't give a crap about taking out a statement that attests to his Constitutional eligibility.

I am very interested though. I've not really had much of an opinion one way or another about his birthright. The only reason it doesn't matter to me is because if he is eligible, there's nothing to worry about and he still stinks as president.

If he isn't then they will do everything possible to keep that fact hidden and we'll all just argue about his entire term and probably for years to come. And he still stinks as president.

Not to say that I don't think he should get the boot if he isn't eligible. It's just that I don't know if we'll ever get to the bottom of it..

--Edit to delete an inconsequential statement

[edit on 11-9-2009 by nunya13]