Did Flight 93 Have Wings? Nope, No plane Crashed In Shankville., page 5

reply to post by CaptainAmerica2012

---

Exactly what is it that would satsify you that a plane crashed in Shanksville? We all know by now the extent of the evidence, the reports, the photos, the testimony, etc. There is nothing new under the sun. You have chosen to not accept it.

You are part of a very small, and growing smaller, group of persons that for whatever reason decided that the same proof that is more than acceptable to hundreds of millions of people is not sufficient for you.

So what would satisfy you and what have you done to answer your own questions?

This is what probaly caused the crater if not then it was a surrogate involved in the wargames of 911.

As you can tell that a lamen could confuse a cruise missile with an aircraft.


[edit on 17-9-2009 by CaptainAmerica2012]

[edit on 17-9-2009 by CaptainAmerica2012]

reply to post by CaptainAmerica2012

---

One of the last people to see the craft go down did not see a Boeing 757. Most of the witnesses said they saw something flying then it crashed but never described it as a commercial airliner as large as a Boeing 757.



www.scribd.com...



[edit on 17-9-2009 by CaptainAmerica2012]

reply to post by TangoVooDoo

---

Nice try. The fact that no plane crashed in shanksville is based on the evidence provided and not on some guess or theory.

Investigators into the matter have concluded that the crater was not caused by a Boeing 757.

Take a good look at the OP this time and read it as well. It would help a little bit to comprehend the thread before putting in your 1 cent.

[edit on 22-9-2009 by CaptainAmerica2012]

Originally posted by CaptainAmerica2012
reply to post by TangoVooDoo

---

Nice try. The fact that no plane crashed in shanksville is based on the evidence provided and not on some guess or theory.

Investigators into the matter have concluded that the crater was not caused by a Boeing 757.

Take a good look at the OP this time and read it as well. It would help a little bit to comprehend the thread before putting in your 1 cent.

[edit on 22-9-2009 by CaptainAmerica2012]

Again you're mistaken. You claim that no plane crashed while evidence shows one did so what you must do is show us that it did not.

Maybe you need a list, I would be glad to offer up a check list for you.

1) You claim no flight 93 crashed. Now you must provide the plane or some type of evidence that shows the plane is still intact.

2) You claim no people died. Get a court order to dig up the coffins. I am sure some remaining family member would have no problem with this as you can tell them you're trying to uncover a government plot against them and that their loved ones are still alive somewhere.

3) Provide a person who is part of this elaborate and well planned cover up. Get them to go on TV/radio and state their case.

Now I am sure there is more but I figured that with only 3 items to provide it shouldn't be that difficult. It could be that I am truly uninformed and perhaps this has already been done and if so please point me in the right direction.

Now if you claim "crash experts" state no plane crashed and you provide their accounts what happens when I provide accounts of "crash experts" that state a plane did crash? Well most likely, as I have already stated, you will scoff at them and shake your head and state....."Because they are paid to say that....they are part of it.....don't you see that?!"

So to close, you want this to be true. If it is then I will owe you a great apology but until that time the ball is in your court, you must provide the evidence.

There is more than ample evidence that states that the crash site in shanksville was not caused by a Boeing 757.

The EPA after numerous tests has failed to find ANY jet fuel or contamination around the Shanksville crater.

Another oddity is that people who blindly parrot the already debunked official story claim the plane pretty much vaporized due to it's speed. Titanium which there are tons of in a Boeing 757 was not recovered. What was recovered was a perfect condition head band allegedly worn by the alleged hijacker, the hijackers passport and 2 other licences. Cee cee Lyles and John Tagnali.

Cee Cee lyes is the women who left a message for her husband. She was a cop turned stewardess. At the end of the message you can hear someone say "You did great". She sounded as she was being coached. The whole call seems suspicious.

There were multiple wargame exercises taking place on 911 involving live fly and passive hijackings. Some of these exercises involved cruise missiles and their interception.

Originally posted by CaptainAmerica2012
There is more than ample evidence that states that the crash site in shanksville was not caused by a Boeing 757.

The EPA after numerous tests has failed to find ANY jet fuel or contamination around the Shanksville crater.

Another oddity is that people who blindly parrot the already debunked official story claim the plane pretty much vaporized due to it's speed. Titanium which there are tons of in a Boeing 757 was not recovered. What was recovered was a perfect condition head band allegedly worn by the alleged hijacker, the hijackers passport and 2 other licences. Cee cee Lyles and John Tagnali.

Cee Cee lyes is the women who left a message for her husband. She was a cop turned stewardess. At the end of the message you can hear someone say "You did great". She sounded as she was being coached. The whole call seems suspicious.

YouTube Link

There were multiple wargame exercises taking place on 911 involving live fly and passive hijackings. Some of these exercises involved cruise missiles and their interception.

The PA DEP found no evidence of jet fuel or hydraulic fluid at the site AFTER THE REMEDIATION. Go to the PA DEP website. Read about the decontamination process for investigators, and the special precautions taken for investigators working in fuel contaminated soil. Unless, of course, everybody at the PA DEP was "in on it".

reply to post by CaptainAmerica2012

---

I reviewed the thread and not one debunkers or person was able to prove the scars or crater were made by a Boeing 757 so therefore the crater in Shanksville was not made by flight 93 the Boeing 757 on September 11th, 2001.

I was going to start my own thread on this and then i found this thread.

As anyone can see the scar marks were most likely made naturally over a coarse of time and without a doubt were not made by an airplane especially one as massive as a boeing 757.

reply to post by TangoVooDoo

---

Oh no, bush was let in on it on the morning of the event, probably on his way to the school where he would read a book, first time since college days. Did you see that look on his face? He was thinking about how the school appearance now made perfect sense. Then they took him to the green room for his scripts. Why should the president know of clandestine zionist acts? The president is nothing but a couple of testicles in rahm emmanuel's pocket, in a manner of speaking. The guy's eyes were stunned , even curious for a change, in those snaps of him in the schoolroom. Certainly he'd been warned, threatened, had had number of veiled threats even he could not ignore, prior to the operation. I forget what the zionists wanted at the moment, war against enemies, some economic sanction, probably a host of things. Bush, quite possibly, might have been doing something right to have set the zionists off on 9/11. It looked like he had no choices left, after that.

This doesn't mean he is without guilt, as the real disaster was yet to unfold~the removal of our birthright was the next move. Acting as the not too bright guy with the 'conservative' party, at least in name, he was just the lesser of two evils. Who did they place opposite bush, father al was it? Bush was the right guy to select for the position.

reply to post by hooper

---

It has been proven over and over again that Flight 93 the Boeing 757 did not cause the tiny crater in Shanksville. After reviewing all the evidence and eyewitness testimony not to mention the obvious images that show that the crater was not caused by a Boeing 757.

Hooper the resident debunker here who also has not gained any credibility claims the plane shrank and lost its wings on impact vaporizing the jet full and leaving a small shallow crater.

reply to post by Shadow Herder

---

Hooper the resident debunker here who also has not gained any credibility claims the plane shrank

Huh? Shrank? I claimed the plane shrank? Please be more specific.

Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Shadow Herder

---

Hooper the resident debunker here who also has not gained any credibility claims the plane shrank

Huh? Shrank? I claimed the plane shrank? Please be more specific.

You forgot "....... claims the plane shrank and lost its wings on impact vaporizing the jet full and leaving a small shallow crater." as you stated in the other thread. Keep your stories together man, it makes you look more credible.

9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags

9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 7 days ago with 13 member flags

An Overview and Debunking of the AE9/11T\'s List of Demolition Signs
  Posted 16 days ago with 12 member flags

Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags

Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags

new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags

Final Decision: Court sanctions lawyers behind September 11 conspiracy case
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags

you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: