It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by seagrass
The all is mind part stumps me. I don't agree for some reason I can't put my finger on. I see brains floating around the universe.
No light or energy or something like that is what I see the universe made up of. The creative energy has consciousness in my opinion, but not necessarily in the form of a mind. Maybe.
not like they are equal, but that was the image that came. Don't get too literal with me buddy! It is just difficult for me to connect many minds/consciousnesses to a one mind/consciousness without some nonliteral connective tissue is my point... perhaps light and energy.
Originally posted by EnlightenUp
Originally posted by seagrass
The all is mind part stumps me. I don't agree for some reason I can't put my finger on. I see brains floating around the universe.
THE ALL is mind? Don't get too literal or you do get lost. To say THE ALL is X and take that at face value, is to put it subordinate to X when in fact ALL cannot be subordinate to any thing.
You also suggest that you believe brain equals mind by your description.
No light or energy or something like that is what I see the universe made up of. The creative energy has consciousness in my opinion, but not necessarily in the form of a mind. Maybe.
What is light and energy?
[edit on 9/11/2009 by EnlightenUp]
Originally posted by EnlightenUp
THE ALL is mind? Don't get too literal or you do get lost. To say THE ALL is X and take that at face value, is to put it subordinate to X when in fact ALL cannot be subordinate to any thing.
Originally posted by TravelerintheDark
If I may... if it is ALL then mustn't it in fact also be subordinate? Isn't it actually ALL and therefore without limitation or position except when attempted to be viewed and interpreted? Rather like the concept of 'super position' in quantum mechanics.
To claim it can only be one thing and not another, even if that one thing is seen as above all else is quite literal and limiting and so doesn't describe ALL, but rather a focused on aspect.
The ALL itself is indescribable in any complete fashion isn't it?
Only our place in it can be known to us and even that is limited by our point of view. Hence, to me, the entire purpose for 'knowing' ourselves.
Originally posted by seagrass
and how does this apply to knowing the self?
As it applies to here on planet Earth?
how is knowing the All is the All of whatever x which is not subordinate but then may be????
Better yet how about we just ignore the political principles I posted and get back to the original OP. I guess they do not apply.
Originally posted by EnlightenUp
To say THE ALL is mind is to imply the possibility that there is mind that is not ALL, hence subordinate, a subset of MIND. If there is MIND that is not ALL, then it is in fact ALL and a subset of ALL.
This is true but how do we carry on a conversation about it?
So long as we have a place in it, that is our limitation.
Originally posted by TravelerintheDark
Within the infinite all possibilities are equally possible. Nothing can be excluded when the vessel encompasses all. Even nothingness is within it and can not be without it.
Originally posted by TravelerintheDark
Just as we are with the awareness that every aspect is merely an aspect of an aspect in an infinite array of aspects. The moment we think we've grasped it, it slips through.
Originally posted by TravelerintheDark
Even nothing is within it. There is no place outside it. There are no limitations.
Originally posted by TravelerintheDark
As above, so below isn't simply a maxim of position and relationship, but a revelation that All is reflected in each of its individual elements. Drops of light which contain a complete picture in and of itself.
Originally posted by seagrass
political only in so far as it is questionable who wrote them who gets credit etc, and the people who surround them. You mentioned Mental Alchemy, so I went and found those principles in a search. Having no familiarity with MA.
Ex uno disce omnes - From one person learn all persons. (From one we can judge the rest)
Originally posted by EnlightenUp
That doesn't mean they're equally possible.
Not all infinities are equal either in content or in cardinality.
Talking of "within" and "without" about something that has no inside or outside makes me giggle, or does it have those qualities and that makes me scowl? Mess it! There's no point.
Slipping and grasping cause severe headaches (no joke). Actually, "slip" and "grasp" don't really express the true nature. There is no grasping and there is no slipping. Only if you grasp can you slip.
Anything that cannot be exited is a prison. If there are no limitations, that is insignificance.
The cell is the man? Yet, with proper chemical coercion and nurturing, it possibly could be.
Each drop may contain a complete picture but it is not complete. Yet, one could make a case that it is.
To wit:
There's really no telling how many times e^x (e=natural logarithm base) had been differentiated in the past nor any limit to how many times is could be. It always is e^x. The question is rather meaningless and absurd yet profound.
Originally posted by Troy_
Then again, this world, this existence, is about contrast, and not everyone is at the level of "complete" freedom and able to devote their lessons or attention to the discovery of the self.
Originally posted by seagrass
We have everything we need here to support spiritual growth. It is our distractions, the ones we don't need that keep us from it. Those distractions can be anything that doesn't serve our true natures.
Originally posted by TravelerintheDark
How can there be more than one infinite? If there is an end there is a limit which makes it finite. Another hall of mirrors.
What is a prison with no walls, no bars and no key? The only barriers are those we create. And whatever we create we can also destroy.
To me complete is simply what it is. Nothing can be left unfinished or undone for that is only a description of the state at which it exists in the moment. And to me every moment is a complete moment in and of itself.
Originally posted by EnlightenUp
Some examples:
There is the set of positive integers which are odd.
There is the set of positive integers which are even.
Both are inifinite but not alike. Add them together and you can number them with themselves.
There are countably infinite sets where each element can be numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.
There are uncountably infinite sets where its contents cannot, such as the number of points in the interval 0...1.
No mirrors at all as I see it. Quite simple really. Infinities are funny things.
Originally posted by TravelerintheDark
But yet alike. 2 is not 1, but 1+1=2.
Every element can contain every other element in the infinite variety of configurations. And every element is also a unique expression and finite.
If we add them together we've chosen an end point and created a finite set. We can't count or add infinity except infinitely which has no end.
We can set any point at which to begin and any point at which to end and we express an element of infinity but not infinity itself which has no expression except in its individual elements.
Yet it is nothing but mirrors endlessly reflecting the infinite. To not see the mirrors is simply not seeing that it is all a reflection and so the true self is lost.
Know thyself begins by allowing the self to understand what are reflections and where you as a self begin and end and realize that we ourselves are only another reflection and so we begin to truly know.
We choose any point at which to begin and end, to facilitate a calculation of the expression in the infinite layers of expression.
0+0=0