Originally posted by captaintyinknots

Originally posted by stevegmu
The administration has spotters in the audience- like V.I. Lenin and J. Stalin did when they gave speeches. They took note of those who didn't cheer loud enough, and dealt with them later. In this case, the Dems who didn't cheer enough would not receive help when up for re-election.

I would love to see a source on this, otherwise it's a very inflammatory lie.

Why is something like this tolerated on this sight?

I spent a number of years on the Hill, and have many friends and associates who are still in the game. I am my own source. Regardless, this is a conspiracy site. Many topics can not be backed by hard 'evidence.'

Sight?

Originally posted by stevegmu

Originally posted by captaintyinknots

Originally posted by stevegmu
The administration has spotters in the audience- like V.I. Lenin and J. Stalin did when they gave speeches. They took note of those who didn't cheer loud enough, and dealt with them later. In this case, the Dems who didn't cheer enough would not receive help when up for re-election.

I would love to see a source on this, otherwise it's a very inflammatory lie.

Why is something like this tolerated on this sight?

I spent a number of years on the Hill, and have many friends and associates who are still in the game. I am my own source. Regardless, this is a conspiracy site. Many topics can not be backed by hard 'evidence.'

Sight?

Yes, please, point out the misspelling of a word. Because that means anything, and makes you look oh so credible.

You can claim to be whoever or whatever you want, but if you know of gastapo-tactics being used, i mean know for a fact, and arent doing anything about it, you are disspicable.

Yes, it is a conspiracy theory site. That does not mean any garbage should be let to pass. DENY IGNORANCE.