I am sitting at home with a cold watching 9-11 Fact or Fiction on the History channel that I DVR'd. I've never really bought in to a lot of the
conspiracy theories out there. It's the type of person I am, so when i was watching this I got an eerie chill seeing Thomas Donnelly. For those who
do not know him you can Wiki his name, but basically he wrote a paper for the American Enterprise Institute that detailed America's recommended
course of action to gain unprecedented power and become the lone super power. Here is an excerpt: "Further the process of transformation even if it
brings revolutionary change is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor. was written a couple
years before 9-11. As seen in Loose Change.
Back to my point, as I am watching the history channel go over all of this they have a small interview with Thoimas Donnelly who authored the
report. He responds to allegations that say he or his think tank orchestrated 9-11.
Watch the video below of what I saw on the History Channel during Thomas Donnelly's response. SEE VIDEO AT 1 minute 8 seconds and you will see
HIM LOOK TO THE RIGHT very briefly. To me, although I am no expert...just my theory...he is lying. It gave me chills the guy just doesn't look
comfortable...and seems squirrely.
Funny thing is of you look up "how to tell if someone is lying" if they glance to the left, they are lying and to the right they are
remembering and telling the truth. Thomas Donnelly looked to the right.........................here's the twist! If they are Left Handed then it is
the opposite! Look back in the video at 1 minute 2 seconds....yep, he's left handed.......
Ok so maybe this is nothing, which it probably is, but it was fun and made me not feel like i had a cold for about twenty minutes while i cruzed
around the net and did my detective work, I felt like i was in an Encyclopdia Brown story.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.