It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by fls13 And please explain how in the 1969, they could produce more convincing special effects than can be done today, 40 years later.
This final picture shows Charlie Duke (pointing), and John Young, at the simulator controls for lunar approach/orbit. The picture on TV screen is reminiscent of the pictures we saw on our TV screens. We were told it was the Moon, but the picture showing on TV screen in photograph is not the Moon. It is a camera filming the plaster paris model of Moon.
Originally posted by Tifozi
reply to post by JimOberg
My friend, if you are going to make that kind of push-up of your arguments, I suggest that you read some pilot manuals, because in the category of disasters they included the space programs deaths.
Just for your knowledge (counting to the current day) the fatalities percentage is on 4,1% on the NASA astronauts and 0,9% on Russian cosmonauts...
If you are going that way off, at least give a good example, like the Nedelin disaster. At least in that one 130 people died...But again, not space related.
[edit on 10/9/09 by Tifozi]
Originally posted by zorgon
But hey... your right...
There is ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE that they could have faked it
Originally posted by Total Package
Of course that is all just hearsay and anecdotal evidence that he went to the moon... there is no actual proof. On top of that poor old Buzz refuses to swear on a Bible that he has walked on the surface of the moon... because you know... that would put him in jail for life if the truth came out that he didn't and he had sworn on a bible that he did.
Originally posted by jritzmann
That is of course providing that "JimOberg" is in fact Mr. Oberg.
Originally posted by fls13
Originally posted by zorgon
But hey... your right...
There is ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE that they could have faked it
I am right. You're not posting material that purports to be from the moonwalks themselves. Thousands of photos and hours of seamless video . . . . views of the moon visible to the horizon . . . and no sign of steel beams . . . .
Originally posted by fls13
reply to post by zorgon
Neither photo demonstrates anything.
Originally posted by ArbitrageurSo unless somebody does better I guess Buzz will miss me at his book signing.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur shake my head at the ignorance of the claims like "no stars in the sky"