posted on Sep, 9 2009 @ 10:59 AM
Originally posted by rich23
Hardly in dispute. But why should ATS suddenly attempt to mobilise its membership (based on an unproven assumption and in a U2U whic, despite what SO
may try and say, was clearly intended to brand Jones as a hoaxer. If, as SO says, the U2U was intended simply to stop people thinking the interview
was real, why did it draw attention to the difference between the initial appearance of the article amd its corrected version?
I think that perhaps the mass U2U should be used more often.
I can't say for sure what SO's or AJ's original intentions were.... but i have to say... AJ hyped this up so much and said that this news would
blow peoples minds and was the biggest news of the year (or in years, can't remember) and then posted a fake interview?
I think it was a stupid thing to do.... whether intentionally deceptive, i do not know... but it was stupid.
Only SO can confirm or deny your suspicions, i have no idea what his intentions were.
I'm with Mister Old School on this. It'll happen the day I become a grandmother.
So am i... that was the point.
I was saying that the Only
way that AJ or CS can be redeemed is if that happened....not that i thought it would.
But then again, stranger things have happened.
If it did, everyone would praise AJ.
Personally I'm not a fan of AJ...never have been and you can read any of my posts on him and none of them are favourable... in the post both you and
MOS are referring to, i was merely saying IF
and only IF
either the meeting happened or millions were alerted to the fact that the
official 9/11 report is, at best, not conclusive... Then, and only then would it be worth it.... and even then, it's still the wrong way to go about
And the U2U has drastically reduced the probability of that.
Well i can't be sure of that.
I'm not sure how every individual would react to it but judging by the usual levels of critical thinking, both in real-life and on ATS...i would say
that people would only read into the negativity of the U2U