It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mmiichael
Originally posted by Lillydale
Ok, you got me. You are absolutely right. I did call your postings nonsense. How about that. You win. You do post some complete nonsense.
Yeah, I actually even say a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon.
Wish I was as smart as you.
M
Originally posted by Lillydale
You can prove that, right?
Originally posted by mmiichael
Originally posted by Lillydale
You can prove that, right?
No point in discussing really. You're pointed to what's there, you ignore it, then just ask for proof again.
I know it's pointless explaining anything complex but try to understand this.
On 9/11 and a few days after, people were concerned with cleaning up wreckage and dead bodies. No one thought they'd be asked to prove what happened really did happen. No one said "we gotta get a picture of these dead bodies in the seats just in case some loon doesn't believe it."
The mass of independent evidence and testimony is so vast, frankly I can't see how how anyone in their right mind can really question that a plane with passengers inside crashed into the Pentagon.
If you genuinely need proof to satisfy yourself a list of people who were there can be contacted.
I don't think you really want more proof as much as you need some way to hold onto the popular folk tale that something different happened.
M
Originally posted by mmiichael
If that’s still not enough, all I can think of is contact the families of the passengers. Ask them for specifics. Find where those people are buried. Ask for permission to dig up their graves – maybe then you’ll have the PROOF you feel you need.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Could you please explain to me how the relatives would know any more than you? Where they on the scene? Did they recover bodies? Did they identify their relatives by sight? Are they just sad people who lost a loved one and have to believe that is was the story they were given the makes it that way?
This argument is old, tired, and pointless. The relatives can no more prove it than google can.
No one is one trial here. No one is required to provide evidence of an event they had nothing to do with. It’s a matter of voluntary information sharing.
Originally posted by mmiichael
Just applying basic logic. Flight 77 takes off at 8:20 and crashes into the Pentagon at 9:37. Human remains are recovered needing DNA testing to identify. These are returned to families for burial.
You're implying there weren't the remains of those people in the wreckage. Gruesome, but with family permission what they had returned to bury could be independently tested for confirmation. The data from the labs could be correlated.
I'm not clear what scenario you're proposing as an alternative?
The air traffic controllers are in on a conspiracy and they didn't really track the flight and their released data was falsified? Those people were whisked away somewhere and killed? Something else crashed into the Pentagon?
You'd have to present pretty convincing evidence of this because you're saying these people were murdered to cover-up something else being sent at the Pentagon.
I can't imagine the complex mechanisms involved, the rationale, why a large number of people would take such a huge risk of exposure. I don't see the benefits to anyone.
But if you can supply something convincing it Would be interesting.
M
Originally posted by Lillydale
Right, you cannot imagine.
You cannot think.
You cannot rationalize.
What you can do is say things that you think because they make this seem true to you.
That is insane at the highest levels.
I am sorry, Michelle but you cannot just decide to believe things that you made up in order to make me wrong.
Which bodies were released to the families?
When did these ATC explain what they had watched and done nothing to alert anyone to?
I really just cannot wait.
Originally posted by mmiichael
Look Sweet Lilly of the Valley
I don't think you're capable of an intelligent discussion on this, maybe not anything that takes real thought.
You're desperately seeking any sort of evidence to feed your fantasy that Flight 77 did not crash into the Pentagon with it's passengers on board.
Nothing short of clear photographs of severed heads matched with pictures of those people would satisfy you. And then you'd ask for proof those photos weren't doctored.
There's something sick and twisted going on. I don't want to be party to it.
I think you've got some real serious problems.
Don't address any more messages to me.
M