It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Reading the headline you may think this post is an exploration into the BNP's policies, however in this instance the headline is to be taken literally: The BNP simply do not have enough money to be a white-only party anymore.
As was commented on by political writer Ian Dunt this week, the BNP were set to go to court on Wednesday, accused by the Equality and Human Rights Commission of breaching the Race Relations Act by not allowing anybody of non-white ethnicity to join the party.
The court proceedings never got underway - the case was adjourned after the BNP changed solicitors at the last minute, potentially a tactic to buy some time while they decided what to do.
On Thursday a statement on the party's website seemed to indicate that Nick Griffin is ready to concede defeat and for the first time accept members of different ethnicities into the BNP. If we are to assume this is true it's a massive decision from Griffin - the BNP has been white-only since its inception in 1982.
Originally posted by felonius
Everyone else seems to have a "spokes group" for themselves....how is it that the indigenous white populations cant have one?
Big bad white bogey man strikes again! Hide your children.
I kinda think this post is a troll.
Originally posted by jd140
Thank goodness they are no longer whites only.
What makes white people think they can have an all white club. Who do they think they are. They get their own club and those good for nothings will want their own month too.
Whats next, their own television station?