I think I can tell you why all the distractions. And they have certainly been very effective so far.
First the Environmental Movement of the seventies, the leveraged buyouts of the eighties, followed by the free trade agreements of the nineties remove
the US industrial base. Foreign investors now own over
70% of the US GNP
as well as
80% our ports and are buying up our toll roads,
bridges and water Authorities.
UN directed political activists slammed the lid on developing any of the USA natural resources from coal and oil to the gold mine near Yellowstone.
Much of the land containing our natural resources has already been turned over to the Central Banker run UN by using the "World Heritage Site"
designation
SO what is left that is not under foreign control? Our farmland - our food supply.
When you look at 2008 and 2009 from the point of view of a grab for control of our farmland and food supply it all falls into place.
1995 - WTO Agreement on Ag sets up the foundation for international regulations.
1996 - FDA/USDA scraps US Food safety program by changing from a zero tolerance import policy to a “scientifically-based and transparent
risk assessment,” program called HACCP and opened US borders to trade in “low risk commodities”. This is why the USA has suddenly been flooded
by tainted imports. The HACCP regs closed down government testing and gave Corporations control of food testing. This is why we see tainted food from
the USA.
1996 to present The big corporations are protected while the media runs front page food scares.
yupfarming.blogspot.com...
2005 The international (WTO/ISO)
" Draft Guide to Good Farming Practices" was presented and the food safety bill was written - it
flopped in the USA but was implemented in the EU. Result- 60% of Portugal's farmers removed, plans to remove a million Polish farmers.
www.i-sis.org.uk...
2008 The collapse of the housing market and the US economy. Foreigners are flocking to the US to buy up cheap foreclosed homes. The Chinese
even have tours organized.
2009 "Land grab" bills introduced as "food Safety" bills.
List paraphrased from
yupfarming
1. The bills contain a civil and criminal penalty section that sets up an independent funding source so there will be no congressional oversight, has
unlimited punishments even beyond the massive ones listed, will be applied by "the Administrator" without judicial review (no trial) over even
validity and appropriateness. (fines up to $1,000,000/day and ten years in jail)
2. Those penalties apply to everyone in the country who "holds" food.
3. Those penalties come on top of no due process, warrantless entry, surveillance, monitoring, taking of all records, ....
4. Those penalties apply to everyone in the country who owns one chicken or has a garden
Food Democracy Now says Monsanto, through Michael Taylor, is expecting to run the giant agency the bills will set up and to control the entire US food
supply, including all farms and homes and gardens.
FARMLAND is turned from PROPERTY to PREMISES, subject to international laws! Rights under the Constitution become no rights whatever through
this word substitution. Farmers become mere "Stakeholders" occupying the land until the real owners come to claim it.....
"With any governmental agency, the words used in any law, regulation, rule or other declaration by the government or its agencies must be carefully
scrutinized. What may seem to be nothing more than a simple word-swap may actually be a new legal definition and one that may come back to haunt you.
Under NAIS the term [property] is swapped for Premises.
"Property is the term used to indicate private ownership of a thing such as land or animals and is protected by rights in the Constitution. It does
signify legal ownership, and who is the legal owner and allows you access to a Civil Court and protection under the Constitution.
"Premises is a term derived from the International Law of Contracts which are the international rules, for conducting business, usually corporate,
whereby [non- human entities] are declared to be [persons]. Agreeing to the redefining of [property] and to the conversion to premises, eliminates
civil protections and redefines you as an [legal entity] who may or may not own the thing in question. This also subjects you to Administrative
Courts using statute and codes which are derived from the International Law of Contracts (ILC) and prohibits any use of rights enumerated or otherwise
within the constitution.
"Neither the government nor its agencies or agents have listed any limits with regard to any authority any or all of them may now assume or implement
as a result of rule making or changes to policies, mandates and regulations. This means you do NOT know all the terms of the contract.
"Neither is NAIS an [adhesion contract] wherein the terms and conditions of the contract never, ever change because USDA or even Congress can change
the rules and regulations at any time.
"Since the USDA is a self regulating and rule making agency, in effect making its own laws and enforcing them at will, rules could be changed at a
later date drastically affecting everyone who has entered into this contract. ...
"In the end, we need to understand that property has a far different meaning under the laws than the word [premises]. Had there not been an intention
to render a change in the status of property ownership and control there would have been no need to use the word Premises."
www.gnhealth.com...
The only reason these bills have not passed so far is because of a major effort on the part of a few citizens. TPTB were expecting to slip them
through Congress with no trouble while everyones attention was on the bailout. The Monsanto's Director of Public Affairs (Brad Mitchell) has been
going nuts trying to marginalize the effort. www.opednews.com...