Is ATS becoming less "fringe-y" ?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 8-9-2009 @ 07:31 PM by jkrog08
reply to post by silent thunder



Personally I just think we are in the middle of a 'lull' in ufological related topics right now. I mean there is only so much that can be discussed in a very slow moving field, such as ufology and most associated topics. Where as the political field is VERY active right now. It comes and goes, there is still a lot of new thread in the UFO forum, but sadly 99% of them are crappy like a dot in the sky, a balloon, CGI, or other hoax. For the near two years I have been on here it seems like ATS is cyclical in my opinion.


reply posted on 8-9-2009 @ 08:23 PM by jackflap
reply to post by silent thunder



I would suggest that if you do not like what you are seeing, come up with an idea that you would like to see. Who knows, you may re ignite something here or within yourself. That's why this site is so cool, it is as good as you can make it. Just think.



reply posted on 8-9-2009 @ 08:36 PM by silent thunder
Originally posted by jackflap
reply to
post by silent thunder



I would suggest that if you do not like what you are seeing, come up with an idea that you would like to see. Who knows, you may re ignite something here or within yourself. That's why this site is so cool, it is as good as you can make it. Just think.


I never said anything about "not liking what I'm seeing." I'm just making an observation and wondering if others agree or disagree.

Peace.


reply posted on 19-9-2009 @ 07:48 PM by nixie_nox
reply to post by jkrog08



I agree. I just don't think there is any new conspriracy material. Everything has been debated. But even when new stuff is presented, then everyone is so obsessed with the partisan bickering that they don't even notice it.

I started a thread on the Emilia Earhardt mystery. I figured SOMEONE on ats has to be somewhat of an expert in it. But I got nothing.

And this has happened to several people.



reply posted on 19-9-2009 @ 08:33 PM by KRISKALI777
reply to post by silent thunder



Hi Silent, maybe its a consequence of individuals realising that political democracies are bunk, and this is the only real say they get to have at all; although that seems at times to be like 'walking on eggshells'.
In reality we (in democracies) only get a marginal political say once every four years; and then the policies we vote one party in over another quickly disappear after the election; and eventually the status-quo outs.
Maybe that is why the sentiments have apparently changed on hear; personally, I haven't been hear for that long.

[edit on 9/19/2009 by KRISKALI777]

[edit on 9/19/2009 by KRISKALI777]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^