It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sirnex
......
.If you say a creator is self evident, then can you honestly tell me some objective evidence with no other cause for it existing besides the universe. Can you HONESTLY and TRUTHFULLY tell me that life can't exist per the laws of physics despite our lack of full understanding of those laws and the processes at work.
.....
Originally posted by sirnex
.... I'm sure I wouldn't be allowed one bit to 'misinterpret' scripture to show that satan is more good than the old testament god without getting an earful no matter the amount of times god kills compared to him. ...
Originally posted by sirnex
.....
I won't get into great detail over the issue's of misinterpreting quantum physics and the use of the misinterpretation to prove the existence of one god out of many. ....
Originally posted by sirnex
What missing ingredient?
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by OldThinker
Your dixen zero was manufactured by man, this leave's nothing for a self-evident deity. Ignorance is a valid point in the argument, especially when ignorance of a process is being used to claim something that is not there.
source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
The mammalian retina contains upward of 50 distinct functional elements, each carrying out a specific task. Such diversity is not rare in the central nervous system, but the retina is privileged because its physical location, the distinctive morphology of its neurons, the regularity of its architecture, and the accessibility of its inputs and outputs permit a unique variety of experiments. Recent strategies for confronting the retina's complexity attempt to marry genetic approaches to new kinds of anatomical and electrophysiological techniques.
Originally posted by sirnex
I mean, let's be absolutely honest with ourselves and look around our universe. What do we ACTUALLY see around us? We see everything following specific laws of physics and not breaking those laws. We don't see anything else, no matter how much one wants to pretend they do.
Originally posted by John Matrix
Originally posted by sirnex
I mean, let's be absolutely honest with ourselves and look around our universe. What do we ACTUALLY see around us? We see everything following specific laws of physics and not breaking those laws. We don't see anything else, no matter how much one wants to pretend they do.
Who, or what made those specific laws of physics?
Who, or what set the universe in motion?
We see design everywhere. Design indicates a designer.
Originally posted by OldThinker
Originally posted by sirnex
What missing ingredient?
Mathematically, why doesn’t it all break apart? The more we learn about subatomic particles called ‘gluons’, the more the universe seems to be made of nothing at all? Scientist says that all the electrons and subatomic particles of an atom are held together in their precise position and orbit by an invisible force, by which without it, everything would fall apart and reality as we know it, would cease to exist in an instant.
Quotes from Discovery Magazine in 2000, “The weirdness comes from the gluons. Quantum chromodynamics, the force that holds protons together, is modeled closely on quantum electrodynamics, the force that holds atoms together—but the gluons change screening to antiscreening, intuitive to bizarre.” And, “The closer you look, the more you find the proton is dissolving into lots of particles, each of which is carrying very, very little energy," says Wilczek. "And the elements of reality that triggered the whole thing, the quarks, are these tiny little things in the middle of the cloud. In fact, if you follow the evolution to infinitely short distances, the triggering charge goes to zero. If you really study the equations, it gets almost mystical." More info here: discovermagazine.com.
Originally posted by sirnex
....If we look at the problem logically we see three possible scenarios :
1. God did it
2. Big bang did it
3. Eternal universe.....
Originally posted by sirnex
We don't see design anywhere, show one thing that is evident of requiring a designer, but try to leave out man made objects as a line of argument.
Originally posted by John Matrix
Originally posted by sirnex
We don't see design anywhere, show one thing that is evident of requiring a designer, but try to leave out man made objects as a line of argument.
The DNA program application with 3 million sets of intructions.
Need more evidence for design?
The galaxies, constellations, solar system, orbital paths, structure of atoms, laws of physics, grass, trees, water, air, fish, birds, animals, people....design is seen everywhere.
Roger Penrose*, a famous British mathematician and a close friend of Stephen Hawking, wondered about this question and tried to calculate the probability. Including what he considered to be all variables required for human beings to exist and live on a planet such as ours, he computed the probability of this environment occurring among all the possible results of the Big Bang.
According to Penrose, the odds against such an occurrence were on the order of 1010123 to 1.
This now tells how precise the Creator's aim must have been, namely to an accuracy of one part in 1010123
Not only would you need to be lucky, your entire family tree would have to win the lottery every week for the next 100 billion years.
Option 3 is not mutually exclusive of 1 and 2 is it?
The DNA program application with 3 million sets of intructions.
Need more evidence for design?
The galaxies, constellations, solar system, orbital paths, structure of atoms, laws of physics, grass, trees, water, air, fish, birds, animals, people....design is seen everywhere.