posted on Sep, 7 2009 @ 06:04 PM
My interests, especially in threads like this is not to discredit the poster, but to give a complete review of what is presented as 'fact', what is
'assumed', and the logical conclusions drawn. I don't set off to disprove a theory, but my knowledge in this arena, though limited, can see that
you are misinformed, misinterpreting, and drawing conclusions with giant stretches of the imagination. While the presentation is good, the substance
and sources are in doubt. I hope to give a fair contradiction to your argument that supply the readers with a well of knowledge from which to draw
their own facts and judge for themselves.