It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Secret US spontaneous human combustion beam tested

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 7 2009 @ 12:51 PM
link   

Secret US spontaneous human combustion beam tested


www.blacklistednews.com

The ATL is much smaller than Boeing's headlining laser weapon, the jumbo-jet-mounted Airborne Laser (ABL), intended to blast enemy ICBMs as they soar upward from pad or silo. Rather the ATL is intended to pick off individual ground targets, somewhat in the fashion of existing Hercules-based side-firing AC-130 gunships. Indeed Boeing has referred to the ATL in the past as its "Laser Gunship".
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on Sep, 7 2009 @ 12:51 PM
link   
" 'ET'- ha! And they keep denying they have alien assistance! " After reading the article , I couldn't agree more with the writer. So we have now developed a weapon that can explode a vehicle's gas tank , take out a cell tower , or incinerete a person ' inexplicably ' without any trace of military involvement. The ' Advanced Tactical Laser ' mounted on a AC-130 gunship, is more of a terrorist weapon if anything.

www.blacklistednews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Sep, 7 2009 @ 12:56 PM
link   
reply to post by L.HAMILTON
 





The ' Advanced Tactical Laser ' mounted on a AC-130 gunship, is more of a terrorist weapon if anything.


Here, Here! Of course, nobody does it better. I was wondering what was taking so long. I have been convinced for twelve years that the ground penetrating radar aboard U.S. satellites has had the capability to cook people from space for a long time. Best to do it slowly, create a lot of cancers in a given area. Hell, yo might as well blame on a chemical plant then. Free testing. U.S. ROCKS. (
)

[edit on 7-9-2009 by KSPigpen]



posted on Sep, 7 2009 @ 01:26 PM
link   
How is this secret? Better assassinate someone with this laser after you have ufos hover over all IR cameras to disable them from viddy taping. Here's a video of the AC-130 with it's standard munitions.. already destructive. (seemingly slightly inaccurate) www.youtube.com...

[edit on 7-9-2009 by thaknobodi]

[edit on 7-9-2009 by thaknobodi]



posted on Sep, 7 2009 @ 02:04 PM
link   

"This milestone demonstrates that directed energy weapon systems will transform the battlespace and save lives," said Boeing exec Greg Hyslop. "The ATL team has earned a distinguished place in the history of weapon system development."


Maybe the vale should finally come off and give credit where it belongs!!!


Directed-energy weapon

Tesla worked on plans for a directed-energy weapon from the early 1900s until his death. In 1937, Tesla composed a treatise entitled "The Art of Projecting Concentrated Non-dispersive Energy through the Natural Media" concerning charged particle beams.[84] Tesla published the document in an attempt to expound on the technical description of a "superweapon that would put an end to all war". This treatise of the particle beam is currently in the Nikola Tesla Museum archive in Belgrade. It described an open ended vacuum tube with a gas jet seal that allowed particles to exit, a method of charging particles to millions of volts, and a method of creating and directing nondispersive particle streams (through electrostatic repulsion).[85]

His records indicate that it was based on a narrow stream of atomic clusters of liquid mercury or tungsten accelerated via high voltage (by means akin to his magnifying transformer). Tesla gave the following description concerning the particle gun's operation:


Tesla's death ray

If Tesla's crack-pottery was a swimming pool his death ray would be the deep end. As early as 1916 Tesla was trotting out his idea for the ultimate weapon that would make war obsolete by providing nations with unopposible destructive power. Well, we got that little number in 1945 and look how well that worked out! While Tesla wasn't the first (or last) to come up with a scheme for building a death ray, he was the one with the credentials to get the press to take him seriously enough to interview him without breaking out in a case of the giggles.


Google Video Link


[edit on 7-9-2009 by SLAYER69]



posted on Sep, 7 2009 @ 02:44 PM
link   
Didn't I read about a weapon like this being trotted out for demonstration right before John Galt gave his famous speech? Life imitating art?



posted on Sep, 7 2009 @ 02:58 PM
link   
Tesla was a moron in my opinion. Someone so intelligent yet has ZERO common sense or "world of hard knocks" knowledge. What I mean is what a fool he was to think he could bring "free" energy to everyone in the world. Did he not understand the power structure at that time? Maybe he should have spent more time doing that than trying to create some unfathomable utopia here on Earth. As long as there are tyrannical and evil people in this world wanting to control and exert power over everyone a thousand Tesla's could come along and solve all our problems and it wouldn't matter. We don't need Tesla or anyone like him.......what we need are the William Wallaces of the world to rise up and destroy the evil, elite scum. People like Tesla would do more for humanity if they would have put a bullet in Rockefeller's head first then worry about free energy later!!!!!!!!


That's what we need nowadays. GOOD and HUMAN and JUST terrorists willing to maim, kill, and plunder and pillage the wealthy elitist scum that rule the world in the name of humanity. Until that day humanity trucks along in it's archaic depravity.

Screw Tesla and screw Einstein. What good is understand the secrets of the universe if no one is willing to stand up and make sure they are used for good and not evil? It's not people like Einstein and Tesla that are going to change the world........it's those willing to kill in the name of justice and wreak violence upon those who are willing to inflict evil on humanity.

Where are the ManOnFire's of the world?
If there is a loving god you bet your ass he has a bodyguard!


[edit on 7-9-2009 by Zosynspiracy]



posted on Sep, 7 2009 @ 03:33 PM
link   
Beams again.
I just happened upon the initial Tesla 40 foot radiogram of a human skull discussion.
Apparently it was from the single terminal technology.
X-Ray tube has a target terminal, like TV screens were a target,
but high voltage.
Tesla showed Roentgen the high voltage produced image and one
year later announced his discovery of x-rays.
The beam from the Tesla bulb, something like a X-ray bulb without
the second terminal and perhaps without a surrounding glass at all,
emits something undisclosed as yet by the CIA technicians who
should now be in control of this device.

The beam disclosed by Tesla was written up by newspaper men
and so far I have not determined the truth behind the 200 mile
range of the death beam but sound like it goes straight and does
not go over the horizon.

ED: This is why you hear from Tesla writers that Tesla did not
complain about Roentgen's discovery. Tesla had a different bulb.
The writer do not tell you this however to hide the Tesla bulb
existence. Another Tesla secret revealed. This pointed out by
Tesla himself and Bill Lyne in 1993 if I recall.



[edit on 9/7/2009 by TeslaandLyne]



posted on Sep, 7 2009 @ 03:47 PM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


Any Death Beam material of Tesla's must be at Los Alamos.
I do hope all his effects were kept in one place.
Lyne thinks the documents were copied many times.
A bulb, a focusing terminal as a half ball bearing, that can carry
any current and voltage may have been Tesla's statement.

Look for some ball bearing factories and see who gets a suspicious
shipping. Although Los Alamos perhaps makes their own.

ED: The beam technology is suspected in UFO propulsion so do
not think info not exactly stated by Tesla is valid.
Thus neither will be disclosed.


[edit on 9/7/2009 by TeslaandLyne]



posted on Sep, 7 2009 @ 05:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne

ED: The beam technology is suspected in UFO propulsion so do
not think info not exactly stated by Tesla is valid.
Thus neither will be disclosed.



We are getting closer.



posted on Sep, 7 2009 @ 08:27 PM
link   
reply to post by whitewave
 


But, who is OUR john galt going to be?



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join