Thats interesting - can you supply a link or book reference?
I could be wrong but SEPRA (formerly GEPAN) did conduct an extensive scientific study - their conclusion being:
"..there are now sufficient material evidences that some ufos are flying machines driven by an intelligence and having flight characteristics that today's human technology is far from reaching".www.ufoevidence.org...
There has also been quite a number of scientific reports written on the UFO subject (like the one below dealing with E.M. interference effects written by Dr. Richard Haines) - perhaps the one common factor in all these studies being that 'pseudosceptics' rarely address them.
56 Pilot Sightings Involving Electromagnetic Effects.
"Reports of anomalous aerial objects (AAO) appearing in the atmosphere continue to be made by pilots of almost every airline and air force of the world in addition to private and experimental test pilots.
This paper presents a review of 56 reports of AAO in which electromagnetic effects (E-M) take place on-board the aircraft when the phenomenon is located nearby but not before it appeared or after it had departed.
Reported E-M effects included radio interference or total failure, radar contact with and without simultaneous visual contact, magnetic and/or gyro-compass deviations, automatic direction finder failure or interference, engine stopping or interruption, dimming cabin lights, transponder failure, and military aircraft weapon system failure.
We're not dealing with mental projections or hallucinations on the part of the witness but with a real physical phenomenon."
Dr. Richard Haines, Psychologist specializing in pilot and astronaut "human factors" research for the Ames NASA Research Center in California-Chief of the Space Human Factors Office.
There are many more examples here - are you truly of the opinion that all this scientific research is just 'propaganda' and theres absolutely no truth to any of the subject matter contained within the reports or congressional hearings?
If so, why?
edit on 2-10-2012 by karl 12 because: (no reason given)