It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
All the cameras use the same type of solid-state, silicon-based CCD image
sensor and associated electronics. This flat CCD is a 1024 2048 array of
12 12 mm pixels. It is a frame-transfer type, as described earlier in Sec. 3.2.
The top 1024 1024 pixels is the photo-sensitive area, and the bottom
1024 1024 pixels is a covered frame-transfer buffer. Thus the active imaging
area is 12.29 mm square with a diagonal of 17.38 mm. (Relatively speaking, in
photography this is not very small. The diagonal of a 16 mm movie camera frame
is 12.63 mm, and the original 8 mm movie frame had a diagonal of only
5.95 mm.) The CCDs themselves are sensitive to wavelengths ranging from about
0.40 mm to 1.1 mm. Filters plus the CCD response determine the specific wavebands.
co-founder Jack Parsons whom were quite involved with secret societes and the occult...
They do not change the colours, the colours are the result of joining the images from several filters.
Originally posted by IX-777
If you want some more evidence on NASA tampering with the images check www.goroadachi.com... - here you have some very good examples on how NASA changes the colors of the images to hide details. Among other things, green and blue will show up as simply brown in their official images hiding a large amount of details.
The cameras have several filters, but the cameras themselves are only greyscale, they are not capable of taking colour photos, the colour photos must be done outside the camera.
Also, some people are not aware of it but the Rovers on Mars actually do have color filter cameras, and several different types of filters, they can take both color photos, infrared photos and black / white photos.
The image quality is not bad, it depends on what they want the images for, although we give too much importance to visual information that does not mean that this is the best way of gathering geologic data, and that was the idea behind the Rovers.
The quality of the images themselves should be an indicator that something fishy is going on - we are still presented with images that are almost worthless when it comes to quality and detail, not much better than what they provided 30-40 years ago with the first missions to both the Moon and Mars.
That's because it's better to have a good greyscale (not black and white, that means only two colours) camera than a lower quality colour camera, and all colour sensors are worse than same sized greyscale sensors.
Even in todays modern world 90% of the images made public are black and white - something which is rather ludicrous considering the technology we have now compared to 40 years ago.
Why would people whom have been working for NASA and other parts of the governments risk their reputations and jobs by going out stating that they ARE involved with such coverups, that they KNOW about alien bases on the moon, they are involved with alien technology etc - even willing to testify in court about it - if it was nothing to it?
Why do you keep ignoring the question about the hundreds of governmental witnesses supporting the claims that images are tampered with, that there are bases on Moon and Mars, knowledge about aliens / alien technology etc?
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean, could you rephrase it, please? Thanks.
Originally posted by IX-777
ArMaP: But would the same woman go to court to testify of such lies without even being charged for anything herself and thus not needing to go to court on her own behalf? Somehow I doubt she would do that.
About the NASA photos (my favourite subject ), how many of those people witnessed images being altered?
These people are trying to expose the governments and bring them to declassify and reveal what is truly going on, and I have no reason to think they are lying as I know myself many of the things they are saying is true.
Apollo Surface Panoramas is a digital library of photographic panoramas that the Apollo astronauts took while exploring the Moon's surface. These images provide a spectacular boots-on-the-ground view of the lunar landscape. The panoramas are stitched together from individual 70mm Hasselblad frames, each of which is also accessible through this new atlas. Lunar surface features captured in the panoramas can be studied using zoom and pan tools. An annotated version of each panorama is also available to assist users with the identification of major geographic features around each Apollo landing site.
Originally posted by IX-777
The most obvious object is the "bag" located at bottom of the photo to the right of the astronaut with the moon vehicle - it is close to the camera / bottom of the image. This is clearly in black and white.
The same goes for several other objects in the photo - just below the wheel to the left of the astronaut is another instrument, some sort of rod sticking up from the ground, again in black and white.
Secondly: Lights - Go to the right of the vehicle and you will see a red cable across the ground coming from the bottom of the image, here you can see light reflections in the lense causing flares and beams to show. Notice that there is no light source above, and the flares and light beams stops exactly where the mountains in the background ends and the black horizon comes in - obviously this should not be the case, the light beams and flares should be consistent out into the black area as well as these are lens artifacts and have nothing to do with the background. In other words, it seems to indicate strongly that the background has simply been cut out following the edges of the mountains.
Thirdly: Background repetition - the background is the EXACT same as the background of the following photo:
These photos are supposed to be taken at different sites, yet the background is identical.
Also notice that there is no visible light source on the first image yet it is strongly visible in the second image...