posted on Sep, 5 2009 @ 10:24 PM
reply to post by smarteye
Lack of emotion? Is that what it comes down to? because for me the following seem to be entirely explainable:
Originally posted by Seventh
Would it not have been better putting the injured in ambulances?, not when you have to get the public sympathy backing, a trauma centre with more
flaws than Bush science, see how many you can spot, I gave you one.....
1st sentance: not if the wounds need immediate medical attention. and many other possible factors, all logically explaining the lack of an
2nd sentance (well it starts with a commer, very articulate as warned) Nothing in regard to the actual photographic detail here, but the speculative
rhetoric remains consistant, all entirely baseless of course. And as it happens the 4th part of the OP has been edited twice...i wonder why. is it
because perhaps as later pointed out to him:
-The trousers were the same colour, the pictures simply didnt capture the light in the exact same way.
-And yes, he is the same man....its just obvious, come on.
-No its not a holster, its a tie, a tie clearly visivble in both pics.
-within the 1st few replies to the OP its pointed out that he is wearing the suspenders in both pics. look for the inverted V, not a holster. as for
the strap round his waist...clearly a crease in his shirt.
-both the time of the pics and the angles are different, so obviously our perception of where certain landmarks and objetcs are within each pic wil
change. The OPoster hanst fully explained what the purpose of the rest of the letters on the above picutres are supposed to highlight, but to me it
simply looks like a desperate attempt to clutch at the straws of a conspiracy theory. I really cant be bothered to watse my time analysing the rest of
this pic. Do it yourselves with the following in mind:
time of day (shadows)
photographic illusions such as foreshortening.
consider the position of the camera angle of the pic your not currently looking at then imagine walking to that spot from the one you currently are
looking at and taking the above into condieration does it seem likely that the image before you will appear as the other picture does? then you'll
see this isnt the trauma centre for sympathy employing bush science to make you more patriotic or whatever, as you may have been lead to beleive by