reply to post by schrodingers dog
Wouldn’t your
reportage have been more accurate and more honest if you just attacked Corsi straight on?
Your linked article is actually based on HOW ACCURATE WND WAS in their revelations of Van Jones’ leftist and radical leanings.
On April 12, the conservative Website WorldNetDaily published an expose on newly appointed White House “green czar” Van Jones that labeled
the environmental activists a “an admitted radical communist and black nationalist leader.”
Based on readily available online sources, including an alternative weekly paper in Oakland, California, Aaron Klein’s piece had a sensational
title–”Will a ‘red’ help blacks go green?”–and a sensational spin. In the 2005 profile of Jones that Klein cited, reporter Eliza
Strickland recalled Jones’s first year out of Yale Law School … when he … got swept up in mass arrests,” then came to sympathize with the
black radicals and communists who’d been arrested with him, before … becom[ing] an environmental activist.
washingtonindependent.com...
In fact, your focus on Cori is entirely
personal, as the article upon which you claim to base this thread mentions him only in passing,
and only as a foil for left-wing criticism of the WND site overall!
Face it. WND was CORRECT about Jones, and they’ve been accurate in many other regards, as the article (regretfully, it is clear) points out.
In fact, your “source” is an excellent example of an anti-WND.
Their “reporting” is clearly leftward-leaning, and even includes among their links, kos, Huffington and’ muckraker.’
Objective? Accurate? Fair?
That's up to the members.
Deny ignorance.
jw
