posted on Sep, 5 2009 @ 12:22 PM
The act of rape and murder are crimes this man committed against women, he clearly have violent issues with women and yet he won the right to be in a
women's prison? Apparently he's not the only misogynist on file, the ruling judge must be as well.
I think this is a legal maneuver to get him out of harms way in a men's prison. I'm sure there are those males who are waiting for the opportunity
to give him the same treatment he gave to his women victims.
The supposed purpose of prison is to reform and punish. If you can get free elective medical services, and gender reassignment operations are
classified as elective procedures, services people on the outside are not privy unless they foot their own bill how is that punishment?
Also wouldn't his punishment to live as a woman in a "man's" body in a male prison, which may mean for the rest of his life, be proper punishment?
Here's another case of abuse from the judicial system, folks with ridiculous claims of human rights abuse being heard and those with legitimate
evidence of abuse not.
If some woman in prison wanted breast implants does she qualify to get them at taxpayers expense? After all the argument could be her self image is
affected by her having small breast. What about facelifts, tummy tucks, butt lifts, lip injections, hair plugs, good heavens the list could go on and
on. They are all elective procedures and most would think a prisoner requesting such for citizens to foot the bills would be out of their minds.
Here's another situation that qualifies for a "what tha....?" award.
Political correctness gone mad is putting it mildly!
[edit on 5-9-2009 by Chai_An]