Dow Target 6,617, October 25, 2009: Here Is Why , page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 4-9-2009 @ 11:02 AM by finemanm
See I think Greeny is right on point when it comes to looking at the stock market as a money making machine. If you are trading stock and doing the tech analysis, its about what is going up and down today, tomorrow and next week. Its impossible to know how a company will do more than one quarter out. Things change, the competition changes, the business environment changes, and traders don't care. Its about which stock will make me money today.

On the other hand, the "real economy" is irrelevant to the stock market. There is absolutely no reason there has been a rally in the past couple of months. Since March, unemployment has gone up, consumer spending has gone down, foreclosures have gone up, GDP has gone down. All these so called green shoots are nothing more than bad results being not as bad as the analysts are predicting. Analyst predicts that there will be 600,000 new unemployment filings, the results are 580,000, and the market goes up.

MickyDees goes up after they fire people because on paper, their numbers look better. If they were planning to sell a million Big Macs, but had to pay 10,000 employees, their cash flow would equal x. Fire a thousand people, and suddenly their expected expenses shrunk and it looks like they are making more money. Stock goes up. But then in three months the results come out that people decided to BBQ in their back yard more than MickyDees expected and they sold only 800,000 Big Macs, stock goes back down. End result = fire another thousand people.

Green Bic, I would never challenge you knowledge at reading charts, you are certainly better than I am at that, but Charts are a fictitious snapshot of the real economic conditions.


reply posted on 4-9-2009 @ 11:19 AM by finemanm
Here is an example of what I am talking about:



NEW YORK (AP) — A mixed report on job losses and unemployment for August nudged the stock market higher Friday. Stocks edged up after the Labor Department reported a slower pace of job losses last month but also an increase in the unemployment rate to 9.7 percent — the highest since June 1983. Analysts had been expecting the rate to increase to 9.5 percent after unexpectedly dipping to 9.4 percent in July. Most economists expect the unemployment rate to top 10 percent by early next year. The report also showed that employers cut 216,000 jobs last month, fewer than the 276,000 lost in July and better than the 225,000 figure analysts had been expecting. It was the lowest level of job losses in a year.
www.google.com...

Because less jobs disappeared than the analyst predicted, the market goes up. Its important that the 216,000 number not be mistaken for the number of people filing new claims. That number is the amount of actual jobs that completely disappeared.



Investors found little support in reports earlier this week on unemployment. The Labor Department said Thursday that the number of people filing for unemployment claims fell last week by 4,000 to 570,000 while the number of people receiving benefits rose. Economists had been expecting a bigger drop. On Wednesday, a private sector report on unemployment showed a decline in job losses in August, but the figure was higher than anticipated.
www.google.com...

Its all a big game. Green Bic has the right approach. He is trying to figure out the rules to the game and make money with the big boys. But when TPTB decide to crash the market, I hope GBM can get out of the market quick.



reply posted on 4-9-2009 @ 11:55 AM by GreenBicMan
reply to post by finemanm



If I was *personally* invested right now it would all be intraday strategies - buying something and holding really only makes sense anymore for stocks like C *imo*


reply posted on 4-9-2009 @ 12:01 PM by GreenBicMan
reply to post by pcgeek



If you look in my media profile you will see I called for this a looong time ago, but that was easy, because we have seen this EXACT setup before - its 1974 all over again mang' so pass that shiznoz

I dont have like extra money invested no, I do have variable annuties that allow for rebalancing though, that I play with, but I dont consider that being in the game. All my previously written programs and such and my new ones are just something where you can sit at home in your underwear, or your favorite garment (personally i dont wear underwear so..) and just sit there and watch yourself make $1400 a day with $100,000

Im guessing you think that is absurd, or most will, thats fine too. There are programs from other companies that do much more complex things that I could ever comes up with, but we will see once all the historical testing is done.


reply posted on 4-9-2009 @ 12:23 PM by finemanm
reply to post by GreenBicMan



Thanks for making my point. Day trading activity has NOTHING to do with the economy. All you need is movement, and the knowledge to predict when the direction of that movement is about to change.



reply posted on 4-9-2009 @ 06:15 PM by GreenBicMan
reply to post by finemanm



If you are an accredited investor you can take 100% responsibility for all monies, and I get 20% of what you put in with no monetary responsibility to you, the rest would be yours (winnings or losing) minus another 8% per year.

But if you think about it, its worth it, but too soon to talk yet before all historical analysis is complete


reply posted on 5-9-2009 @ 10:44 AM by GreenBicMan
reply to post by whiteraven



Well, I cant quite remember the 70's as I was not alive then, I prob. couldnt rememeber it anyways even if I was, but if you reference the moves in the stock market - meaning if you compared the two side by side, you would have no idea which one was the 70's or 2008-09 (unless you say the numbers on the side)

The moves are almost lockstep- no one likes to bring this up either because

1. The are ignorant of it, or uneducated

2. It doesnt fit their agenda (meaning it wont get web hits like "death to economy in 20 days etc..)


I have been trying to pitch this to everyone here for a super long time, but I kept getting called a disinfo agent lol - when its the OTHER WAY AROUND haha


reply posted on 6-9-2009 @ 11:26 PM by Rockpuck
reply to post by GreenBicMan



Hmm considering the deflationary effects of evaperating credit... I woould to see the explanation economically of how how 1970's and 09 are similar...



reply posted on 6-9-2009 @ 11:29 PM by GreenBicMan
reply to post by Rockpuck



The charts

Energy Crisis = Banking Crisis

The charts almost 100% confirm that and I have backed this up in another thread but I cant remember where or when, but its there


reply posted on 7-9-2009 @ 12:56 PM by Rockpuck
reply to post by GreenBicMan



No, no.. you misunderstand..

Economically how is 1970 and 2009 alike? I am not talking about markets (which I don't see as alike either)..

For instance you speak of energy.. in 1970 oil was expensive because of an embargo... in the 00's oils expensive due to depreciated value of our currency and over speculation... quite different..

Besides, the economy is supposed to direct the market, the market cannot direct the economy?

Flawed logic.


reply posted on 7-9-2009 @ 04:00 PM by GreenBicMan
reply to post by Rockpuck



The market almost views them as identical, as for what "x" is now and how that is different than "y" this time around, well that is not for me to hypothesize, but more for someone like yourself since you are a historical mastermind like a few others on here. I am sure you could piece it together in about 15 mins if you put your mind to it lol.

The part that is important to me is that the market views these two events in a VERY SIMILAR FASHION.

[edit on 7-9-2009 by GreenBicMan]


reply posted on 7-9-2009 @ 04:21 PM by GreenBicMan
reply to post by Rockpuck



A reply to your last sentance.

That is incorrect.

The MARKET tries to ANTICIPATE the ECONOMY in 6-18 months = FWD LOOKING INDICATOR
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



USDA Forces Whole Foods To Accept Monsanto
  Posted 10 days ago with 99 member flags
Greece wipes out Citizens Debt!! Tells Bankers to suck it
  Posted 11 days ago with 78 member flags
The Collapse of The American Dream Explained in Animation
  Posted 18 days ago with 53 member flags
Obama on the verge of a deal with the banks
  Posted 16 days ago with 23 member flags
EU financial dictatorship agreed to by EU ministers last night
  Posted 18 days ago with 17 member flags
Bankers requesting that Greece become their debt slaves
  Posted 14 days ago with 15 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 68 replies