posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 03:37 PM
Please accept the following from someone that also searches for the truth, has 25+ years doing so and a slew of equipment to help him try and
accomplish that goal.
I also agree with the above postings that the trajectory you think is a clear indication of the path of "the satellite" veering at an angle is
simply the camera rotating and moving to keep up with it.
The Camera has to turn on the tripod to be able to keep the satellite within it's POV. This is normal and I myself have footage of satellites that
would compliment this 'capture'. Even if the camera was on a wide shot with the horizon plane visible, we would get the 'illusion' that the
'satellite' was 'arcing' from "Point-A to Point-B" as it travels over the curvature of the Earth.
In regards as to the blinking/pulsing. As the satellite spins, it catches the reflection of the sunlight which in turn creates this "pulsing" effect
( in most cases). Satellites tumble and turn as they orbit.
Although I can appreciate your eagerness and desire to back up your 'beliefs' (which is great, I too believe it is mathematically impossible for
Earthlings to be the only lifeforms in the Universe), one has to be able to rule out a number of factors before anyone in the field of UFOlogy will
take you seriously. To put up a video from YouTube which isn't even at a 4:3 aspect ratio and is highly compressed followed by a Thread header to
have "Skeptics debunk this" is actually a rather poor decision for anyone wanting some real answers. For this post to be taken seriously, we would
require a ton of information for example:
Date, time, Location, wind/weather conditions, equipment used, the settings and focal lenses on said equipment, witnesses names, reports of same
sighting perhaps seen/captured else where by others. Witness's exact description of the event, the length of the event, Actual color and size
description of the "unknown", if it was visible by the naked eye, etc., (not to mention the possibility to review the 'actual footage'). And
that's really just a brief list of requirements..
Now this makes the 2nd time (that I'm aware of) that you've thrown out a "youtube video" with a header for Skeptics to come debunk it. You provide
no added information to back the information you post yet get irritable when "the wisdom of the crowd" offers their thoughts and conjecture as to
what it is were seeing. If you would like us to take your submissions with a bit more respect, perhaps you should respect the comments and the
intelligence of our members prior to posting as many themselves also believe but know that one needs to use "occams razor" before they step
Just my two cents
[edit on 9/3/2009 by JohnnyAnonymous]