It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bush says explosives used on 9/11

page: 3
25
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 09:21 PM
link   
This just shows that our presentation of material is no better than the methods of Fox News or those institutions that we are supposed to destroy.




posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 09:52 PM
link   
Yer it won't be long to we see Bush Cheney and Rumsfeld hanging on a jibbet!
I seen it in a dream,Chaney cried like a little girl and he pissed his pants as they lead him up too the gallows!!



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 09:55 PM
link   
reply to post by MOTT the HOOPLE
 


One can only wish.
However, I have come to realize that you can't count on dreams coming true.
I had a dream not too long ago about something, shall we say off topic for these boards with a co-worker.
Doesn't mean it is going to happen. In fact, I wouldn't let it even if it were possible... which it isn't.

People read way too much into their dreams.

Misplaced rant, I know. Just something people need to realize.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 10:01 PM
link   
reply to post by orby1976
 


Mr. George Bush SCHERFF knows more than he speaks of.

The EVIDENCE of melted metals and engine blocks and other metal car parts many blocks away from the towers speaks volumes to the fact that a BLACK TECHNOLOGY was used!

This would indicate a DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPON!

Similar to the phenomenon seen in the JOHN HUTCHISON EFFECT VIDEOS!

How else can you explain these effects and deny the evidence??



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 10:40 PM
link   
reply to post by muggl3z
 


"They had so many cameras, they would have burned the image of that plane hitting the Pentagon into our retinas if they had it."



You are so right!



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 10:45 PM
link   
Did President Bush ever explain who Al Queda was?

I don't think he did.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 10:54 PM
link   
reply to post by 12.21.12
 


We don't need that a-hole to explain anything. We all know that Al Qaeda was NOTHING until the CIA created it.


[edit on 3-9-2009 by JayinAR]



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 11:08 PM
link   
reply to post by JayinAR
 



What you see depends on what you're looking for.



Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it.”
Andre Gide



“The answer is never the answer. What's really interesting is the mystery. If you seek the mystery instead of the answer, you'll always be seeking. I've never seen anybody really find the answer -- they think they have, so they stop thinking. But the job is to seek mystery, evoke mystery, plant a garden in which strange plants grow and mysteries bloom. The need for mystery is greater than the need for an answer.”
shrbek Ken Kesey



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 11:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
 


Nice with the 8pt. bold.

No, the mystery isn't more intriguing than the answers.
The answers are F#ING important as they were carried out by REAL PEOPLE WITH REAL agendas.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 11:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
 


I mean, we are talking about 3,000 people who lost their lives in one act of evil.
Subsequently, there have been more than 1 million who have died through this VERY REAL action.
This isn't philosophy, brother, this is real life stuff.
This is an investigation.
Not a socratic quest.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 11:17 PM
link   
reply to post by JayinAR
 


I guess you missed my point. Al queda could be Aunt Jemima for all we know.

Dick Cheney could be doin Al Queda.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 11:19 PM
link   
reply to post by orby1976
 

President Bush one of the greatest presidents of the 20th century. My favorite president during my life time. You haters can take clips and take it out of context but that only shows how feeble your argument is, lol. Keep it up, it makes truther looks like fools just like the 9/11 special on the National Geographic Channel. The NGC made truthers look like loons. hehe. Long live Bush.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 11:21 PM
link   
reply to post by JayinAR
 

reply to post by JayinAR
 


The "answers" to your "investigations"......................................

What you see depends on what you're looking for.



Oh and P.S., philosphy fits into everything as one's philosophy colors one's perception.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 11:22 PM
link   
reply to post by 12.21.12
 


I guess you missed my point. Al Qaeda was funded and instituted by the CIA.
I thought this was basically regarded as fact.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 11:24 PM
link   
reply to post by JayinAR
 


And couldn't have possibly gone rogue. No way. That's impossible. Such things NEVER go rogue.
And who put Saddam into power again and then who did he hate?



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 11:24 PM
link   
reply to post by alienj
 


I don't mean to be a jerk, but that is easily the most foolish comment I have seen made on these boards in quite some time.
A month at least.
Congrats.

This country is literally begining its death-throws and that BEGAN under Bush.
Because of Bush.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 11:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
 


I don't follow.
Please clarify.



posted on Sep, 4 2009 @ 03:41 AM
link   
Think about this logically...
If 911 was a conspiracy, Bush wouldn't accidentally forget that it was...
If you murder someone and your friend asks you what you've been up to, are you going to 'accidentally' say "oh, you know, just killing people..."?
That's absurd. No matter how stupid you think Bush is, the mind just doesn't work that way.
If anything, it was a poor choice of words.



posted on Sep, 4 2009 @ 03:53 AM
link   
reply to post by earthship35
 


Bias is not an indicator of truth.
I've yet to see hard evidence that 911 is an inside job.
I suppose if there was hard evidence, it wouldn't be a conspiracy theory.
This isn't about "retarded skeptics". It's about some people seeing what they want to see, and others seeing the reality.
The reality is that this statement was taken out of context.
Most of us can see that.
Why can't you?

[edit on 4-9-2009 by TruthParadox]



posted on Sep, 4 2009 @ 05:28 AM
link   
the first question is :

does this reffer to the actuall 9/11 attacks - OR some other planned or discussed attack ?

second point :

if you are " planting explosives high enough to trap people and prevent escape " then logically this is just beyond the reach of the availiable rescue equiment , isnt it ?

the maxiumum height that various fire departments can preform a rescue at is well documented - as buildings over that height have different restrictions on design and escape stairs etc [ at least they do here in the UK ]



new topics

top topics



 
25
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join