A-10s Upgraded to Stay 'viable' for 'a Couple more Decades.' , page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 2-9-2009 @ 10:26 AM by KSPigpen
‘Warthog’ squad revamped with digital upgrades

Stripes.com
(some really nice pictures at the link)

The “Warthog” — or Thunderbolt II as it is officially called — sat in a Belgian factory in the process of being upgraded to the A-10C model.

There are new computer systems, including a multifunctional display with a color map, and the planes can now carry satellite-guided bombs and other smart weapons.


..in a BELGIAN factory....because they apparently need the work more than Amricans.

The new communication systems and satellite-guided weaponry will allow A-10 pilots to be more precise when targeting the enemy, according to Lt. Col. Ron Stuewe, commander of the 81st Fighter Squadron at Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany.

This has taken on new urgency since Gen. Stanley McChrystal, commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, issued a directive to avoid civilian casualties at all costs.


Definitely a good thing to only hit what you're aiming at.

According to Warthog News, a Web site that compiles “Airpower Summaries” released on the Air Force’s Web site, the A-10 Thunderbolt IIs were used at least 26 days in Afghanistan during the month of July.

“The A-10s have always proved their merit, and nothing can fill that void,” Stuewe said. “If we’re going to stay around for another few decades, the planes needed to be upgraded to stay viable.”


Another FEW DECADES? As in THIRTY YEARS? Am I misinterpreting this statement?


All 24 A-10s in the 81st Fighter Squadron have been approved for the upgrade, which will cost an estimated $286 million and is part of an Air Force-wide program.

The last of the squadron’s seven planes are now at the factory, and all will be ready to fly before this spring, which is the earliest the squadron could deploy.


Well...sounds like they are just about done and will be ready to roll come springtime. To the tune of a third of a TRILLION dollars. Yay America! We can sure blow stuff up nice. Warms the cockles of my heart.

Edit to change the title. Sounds like it was probably misleading.

[edit on 2-9-2009 by KSPigpen]


reply posted on 2-9-2009 @ 11:38 AM by KSPigpen
reply to post by rogerstigers



Well...that makes me feel a little better, I suppose, not that my feelings matter in any of this...I suppose I just read things like this and thought this was just another confirmation of an almost never ending quagmire.

Gates: It's A "Mystery" How Long US Forces Will Be In Afghanistan
"None of the civilian officials or military officers interviewed in Afghanistan and elsewhere expected substantial progress in the short term. They talked in terms of years two, five and 10," the report noted.

The varying timelines, in part, may reflect politics.

Capitol Hill has grown wary of approving annual war chests after years of ever-increasing costs for Iraq. Obama has asked Congress for $68 billion next year to fund defense spending in Afghanistan. The U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, Karl Eikenberry, recently asked for another $2.5 billion in nonmilitary spending, The Washington Post reported this week.

Military officials believe the Afghanistan mission can only succeed if troops are there far longer – anywhere from five years to 12 years.


Despite election, U.S. troops in Afghanistan for long haul

Earlier this month, Gates said it would take "a few years" to defeat the Taliban and al Qaeda, the terror network behind the 9/11 attacks that was given haven under Taliban rule. Gates further said it was a "mystery" how long U.S. troops would remain in Afghanistan.
Officials have told U.S. Senate investigators that any progress in Afghanistan will be "incremental" and could take between two and 10 years.


It seems to me that nobody really knows how long we'll be there. It's apparently a 'MYSTERY.'





reply posted on 2-9-2009 @ 12:32 PM by VitalOverdose


who in their right mind would want to get rid of a weapon like this ?


[edit on 2-9-2009 by VitalOverdose]


reply posted on 2-9-2009 @ 12:43 PM by SLAYER69
reply to post by KSPigpen



This is not unheard of. When you have something that works you keep it.

Case in point.

B-52H

Future of the B-52

Even while the Air Force works on new bombers scheduled for 2018 and 2037 it intends to keep the B-52H in service until at least 2040, nearly 80 years after production ended. This is an unprecedented length of service for a military aircraft.[4][73] B-52s are periodically refurbished at the USAF maintenance depots such as Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma.

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 3 days ago with 9 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 6 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 4 days ago with 6 member flags
Pair Detained in Twitter Homeland Threat Mix-Up
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 14 hours ago, 110 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 80 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 9 hours ago, 62 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 17 hours ago, 51 replies