One of the earlier posts dissed scoped shooting. As a competitive shooter in both iron and scoped class shooting disciplines, the answer is pretty obvious by looking at shooting scores. Scoped class shooters average 50% more bullseye hits at the same ranges than iron sights shooters. Even with the rather wimpy 5.56 NATO round, you can extend your effective range by 100%(600m vs. 300m) with a 3x-6x scope with a minimum of training. With a lighted reticule or red/green dot sight, you can actually aim effectively at night and other low light conditions. Why do think that both Army and Marines have added electro-optical sights as part the M16/M4 weapons systems platforms?
Nothing replaces time behind the trigger, preferably the trigger you're going to shoot with but time behind any trigger is preferable to no time behind the trigger. Folks pressed for time or lack of range space should practice shooting skills with airguns. Hitting a 1/2" target at 25 yards with an airgun is the ballistic equivalent of hitting 1" target at 100 yards or farther. Snap shooting used to be done by the Army with Daisy Red Ryder bb guns without sights. I still practice that way occasionally.


your help may someday save an innocent life and that is
something to take pride in... 

