Controversial New 9/11 Ad (must see), page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 17 times


reply posted on 2-9-2009 @ 10:39 PM by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by Curio



Last I checked human beings ARE an act of nature, one might even say humanity is the worst Natural Disaster in history.

I'm unsure how a life murdered can be considered more valuable or heartbreaking than a life lost in a horrific disaster.

Are you saying just because the deaths during the Tsunami weren't caused my men that somehow diminishes the loss or tragedy?


reply posted on 2-9-2009 @ 10:45 PM by patent98310
Should have been:

The Tsunami Wasn't a Black Op.



reply posted on 2-9-2009 @ 11:13 PM by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by Curio



More disturbing perhaps but no less sad but then again in the case of 911 there are plenty to point fingers at (terrorists, government who knew it was coming and did nothing to stop it), there are people to blame.

One thing we shouldn't do is become bitter or be angry at every little mention of the attacks that we deem disrespectful.

If we're going to be angry let's be angry at the people who committed the horrific acts that day, not some ad trying to make a point about how many more people died in the Tsunami. And if we're not going to get angry and do something about the morons in office who allowed 911 to happen and then stole our freedom then let's stop the charade now and stop getting offended when someone brings up the attacks...

No, instead we kept all the anger and let it direct them down this self-destructive path, we left the same old politicians and corrupt financial powers in charge and let the terrorists get away (those that hadn't already blown themselves up), we sold our freedom for the illusion of safety and then invaded two nations who had nothing to do with the attacks... Now after all that we get offended over a simple Advertisement

Seems us Americans will only get truly angry and passionate about something if it involves complaining from our keyboards...


reply posted on 2-9-2009 @ 11:40 PM by bagari
reply to post by Mattieon


So what are you saying - we need to put money into anti-tsunami technology? The US provided all kinds of aid to the areas that got hit by the tsunami - I know because within 2 days I was helping in Thailand and a week later was helping with aid in Sri Lanka. The US also helped fund the tsunami warning system expansion so that all areas in the region get some warning that a tsunami is approaching.

The poster has no real point. There were more deaths in the tsunami than on 9/11. And your point is......what? What does it have to do with WWF and their goal of "living in harmony with nature?"

[edit on 2-9-2009 by bagari]


reply posted on 2-9-2009 @ 11:43 PM by Mattieon
Originally posted by bagari
reply to
post by Mattieon



Exactly. The poster has no real point. There were more deaths in the tsunami than on 9/11. And your point is......what? What does it have to do with WWF and their goal of "living in harmony with nature?"


Sorry did you read my post at all, take money away from war and put it into the environment and disaster prevention. I think I made that pretty obvious .

Umm the amount of help provided to the tsunami is worthless compared to the useless money spent on a war that has done nothing but spread violence.

Are you saying that the only time the environment needs money is AFTER a disaster happens? The environment deserves a lot more money put into it than any war or disaster, after all we seem to take for granted that it sustains all of our lives when we really only take from it.

[edit on 2-9-2009 by Mattieon]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^