It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Jimbo,
You can't expect us to believe that the multiple objects in the video are all the moon....
*Did you even watch the video before coming up with your moon theory?
Originally posted by Exuberant1
You can't expect us to believe that the multiple objects in the video are all the moon....
Originally posted by JimOberg
Actually, Stubbs did not claim the image was NOT the moon.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
What he did not do or say is not in dispute as it has not been said or done - You are the one who is implying that the moon accounts for multiple objects....
Originally posted by depthoffield
Hello, Mr. Oberg,
ussually i agree with you, and i understand (feel with my own insight) your points, that there are people jumping to exotic speculations on purpose.
But here i have another opinion. In the OP movie, it could be moon at first glance, but there are clues that just exclude the moon explanation.
here 3 clues:
1) first clue: at 3:06, the bright object dissapear, apparently beyound Earth. But if looking closely, it dissapear in front of Earth. Of course it could be moon yet, with some kind of imaging effect, but i don't think so.
2) second real clue: after the object suposedly beeing moon dissapear, the clouds/Earth surface still maintain the same luminosity. It should be must loose brightness if that object was moon and the brightness of the Earth Surface was from it.
3) third real clue: the shadows of the clouds... this shadows show us where was the source of light. It is not that object. Of course, what illuminate the Earth Surface was indeed the moon, the narrator also describe this, but that object is not the moon.
What can it be?
A) Mundane explanation: Of course, a little larger singular piece of debris, which we know is quite common. Beeing a bit larger, could stay in sincron (holding more to that little atmospheric drag) with the shuttle a longer period of time before drifting slowly away. This very probable hypothesys should be eliminated before jumping to other much lower posibilities.
B) Exotic explanation: whatever our imagination can build. I guess it shoud be a lost dead soul... or a Pleiadan ship..or whatever.. We need real proofs in order to accept one wild thoery or another..until then, let the imagination ride free.
Originally posted by JimOberg
You're right, this cannot be confirmed without knowledge of the actual times of the scenes.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
(just ignore the UFOs for now...)
*Check out the image manipulation that occurs over the span of the video.
These two shots are just thirty seconds apart:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/cb551c21d6c0.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/8246b11dc066.jpg[/atsimg]
Nice Camera
[edit on 2-9-2009 by Exuberant1]
An automatic light control is available for each camera. Its modes compensate for scene brightness by eliminating a fraction of the brightness. It then adjusts the light level of the scene by controlling (1) the silicone intensified target tube high voltage, (2) lens aperture (iris) and (3) automatic gain control. As a result, more detail and contrast are available in the brighter areas of a scene. Light or dark areas of a camera scene can be enhanced or subdued by means of gamma commands. More contrast can be obtained within light or dark areas. Zoom capability magnifies or reduces the size of objects in a camera's field of view by adjusting the focal length of the lens. The minimum focus for standard lenses is 3 feet, the maximum is infinity.
Originally posted by zerotensor
Verdict: Stars!
Originally posted by zerotensor
Verdict: Stars!