It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Well homosexuals are a minority that practice a behavior... there are endless other types of behaviors too that other minority groups practice. Why do we try to separate one minority behavior from all the others?
That is the big question here.
I understand what your trying to say here as I've used that sort of argument in my debates about homosexuality before.
Obviously the big difference is that gays, on their own, are not hurting anybody.
Whereas rapists, peadophiles, cannibals obviously are.
Not having a go at you because I don't like homosexuality either but just thought I'd point that out.
Originally posted by Robin Goodfellow
By the same standard, why do two girls who want to get married care so badly that the heterosexual community acknowledge their relationship?
If their relationship is based on the idea that they love each other and wish to spend their lives together then why do they care if it is called a marriage or a civil union?
Why do they wish to march in parades. There are no group of heterosexuals demanding a group of people who prefer missionary position sex be allowed to march.
And why are the homosexuals, who have experienced the 'horrors' of discrimination as regards the legitimizing of their relationships not out supporting people who wish to engage in sex with or even marry farm animals?
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
Proper, no. Any of your business? Also, no. Just like if your neighbors like to do the slap and tickle with shackles and chains. Your approval is not necessary. It's none of your business.
You are right it is none of my business...well until it is officially recognized by the government as totally acceptable within our laws, customs and traditions.
You see that is the point...
Originally posted by oneclickaway
By whom? One can only assume by heterosexuals as they are in the majority…so what is your point?
It is the obviously hateful content and contempt and disparagement that elicits a response. Christians cannot call for the death or murder of people, tell them they will rot in hell, that they are a disgrace, abnormal, unnatural, call them names and condemn their very existence…and then cry that they have been called bigots and play the victim. Keep your views to yourself if you do not wish for a response.
You are not God, so do not speak for a power so big you cannot contemplate it. It may be the hating Christians that have been given up on.
I hate to break it to you but this is not a Christian debating site. Maybe you are in the wrong place.
Any dangers the country is facing is because of the corrupt, greedy, evil, self obsession and lack of any emotional feeling let alone intelligence of the government and ruling elite….most of whom must be heterosexual.
I would love to see a higher standard of behaviour from a Christian. However, on the whole, I mainly see condemning nonsense and foaming at the mouth because they are disagreed with. I will ‘say it like it is’. A lot of Christians need to go pray, as their behaviour is so far from that of Jesus, that it makes a mockery of quoting and following the teachings. It is hateful, controlling and lacking in any empathy or intelligent understanding.
So…duh….having pastors declaring that God condemns gays and that they should be killed could never promote violence towards gay people? There is your evidence. If you cannot see that, then it goes back to my argument of lack of emotional or any kind of intelligence.
Everyone in this world should have equal rights, equal laws, equal taxes, equal protection.
"Homosexuals" believe that “marriage” can mean something as suitable a receptacle for the male seed as the womb; that the rectum a filthy smelly disease prone orifice of a fruitless union should be given the same dignity of that which produces human life.
You seem to have an obsessive interest in the male anus and one specific homosexual act. What is interesting is that I doubt any homosexual gives any thought to heterosexual sex even though they are bombarded with those images from the moment of birth. Interesting isn’t it?
Also if you see marriage as purely about the physical act then I pity you. Marriage in its purest form is about the union of two people in a commitment to each other, in a spiritual sense, which also encompasses the sexual act as an outward expression of that love. Many heterosexuals have children accidentally, or without any thought at all, so it becomes merely an act of nature rather than some spiritual act of superiority.
Homosexuals are forced to pay for those children through taxes, whilst being shunned from the taxing society and told that they are not meant to have children, Fine, recompense them all then. Homosexuals, and indeed everyone, deserves their fair share of tax breaks.
There you go again with the contempt for humanity and the lack of any intelligence…just hatred and vile smugness….everything that Jesus warned about not being.
Disease spreading among gays like a plague where aids and mrsa are spread 80-90 % among gays in America
That statement is just so extraordinarily ignorant that I cannot be bothered to counter it.
Well, as a third of heterosexuals have ‘sex with their asses’ then in your strange thinking it must be the fault of heterosexuals.
If there is a God and that is true, why keep foaming at the mouth. Stop talking of love as you know not what that is. It is not your place to decree anyone’s relationship with a God. That is between the person and their God and it is none of your business. Your relationship with God is your business too. So if you feel gay people will burn in eternal torment…fine. You may be in for a shock though and find that your behaviour in hating and denigrating people has backfired on you. So why not just mind your own business,
stop worrying and thinking about male to male anal sex, and just attempt to live as Jesus exampled and taught
. I fear that we are next. We may decide right or wrong based on our flawed human wisdom, but there is a higher moral standard laid down by the hand of God.
Originally posted by Robin Goodfellow
reply to post by breakingdradles
By the same standard, why do two girls who want to get married care so badly that the heterosexual community acknowledge their relationship?
If their relationship is based on the idea that they love each other and wish to spend their lives together then why do they care if it is called a marriage or a civil union?
Why do they wish to march in parades. There are no group of heterosexuals demanding a group of people who prefer missionary position sex be allowed to march.
And why are the homosexuals, who have experienced the 'horrors' of discrimination as regards the legitimizing of their relationships not out supporting people who wish to engage in sex with or even marry farm animals?
Just curious
Source.
According to a report given to the Office of the General Counsel of the U.S. General Accounting Office, here are a few of the 1,138 benefits the United States government provides to legally married couples:
Access to Military Stores
Assumption of Spouse’s Pension
Bereavement Leave
Immigration
Insurance Breaks
Medical Decisions on Behalf of Partner
Sick Leave to Care for Partner
Social Security Survivor Benefits
Sick Leave to Care for Partner
Tax Breaks
Veteran’s Discounts
Visitation of Partner in Hospital or Prison
Here are a few of the state level benefits within the United States:
Assumption of Spouse’s Pension
Automatic Inheritance
Automatic Housing Lease Transfer
Bereavement Leave
Burial Determination
Child Custody
Crime Victim’s Recovery Benefits
Divorce Protections
Domestic Violence Protection
Exemption from Property Tax on Partner’s Death
Immunity from Testifying Against Spouse
Insurance Breaks
Joint Adoption and Foster Care
Joint Bankruptcy
Joint Parenting (Insurance Coverage, School Records)
Medical Decisions on Behalf of Partner
Certain Property Rights
Reduced Rate Memberships
Sick Leave to Care for Partner
Visitation of Partner’s Children
Visitation of Partner in Hospital or Prison
Wrongful Death (Loss of Consort) Benefits
If you were a Christian, you'd be admiting they are wrong for wanting such legislation, wromg for wanting it taught in public schools, wrong for wanting to make it legal to have sex in public restrooms, wrong for wanting to lower age of consent laws, wrong for wanting to decriminalize sex crimes, wrong for so many reasons that one doesn't have to be a Chritsian to appreciate how wrong gays and the gay lobby is for many of the things they want to accomplish.
[
By the same standard, why do two girls who want to get married care so badly that the heterosexual community acknowledge their relationship?
Why do they wish to march in parades. There are no group of heterosexuals demanding a group of people who prefer missionary position sex be allowed to march.
It is like saying gay marriage will lead to public masterbation, which is just ludicrious.
As to why homosexuals want to be able to get married, let's look at what advantages civil marriage holds:
As to why homosexuals want to be able to get married, let's look at what advantages civil marriage holds:
Source.
According to a report given to the Office of the General Counsel of the U.S. General Accounting Office, here are a few of the 1,138 benefits the United States government provides to legally married couples:
Access to Military Stores
Assumption of Spouse’s Pension
Bereavement Leave
Immigration
Insurance Breaks
Medical Decisions on Behalf of Partner
Sick Leave to Care for Partner
Social Security Survivor Benefits
Sick Leave to Care for Partner
Tax Breaks
Veteran’s Discounts
Visitation of Partner in Hospital or Prison
Here are a few of the state level benefits within the United States:
Assumption of Spouse’s Pension
Automatic Inheritance
Automatic Housing Lease Transfer
Bereavement Leave
Burial Determination
Child Custody
Crime Victim’s Recovery Benefits
Divorce Protections
Domestic Violence Protection
Exemption from Property Tax on Partner’s Death
Immunity from Testifying Against Spouse
Insurance Breaks
Joint Adoption and Foster Care
Joint Bankruptcy
Joint Parenting (Insurance Coverage, School Records)
Medical Decisions on Behalf of Partner
Certain Property Rights
Reduced Rate Memberships
Sick Leave to Care for Partner
Visitation of Partner’s Children
Visitation of Partner in Hospital or Prison
Wrongful Death (Loss of Consort) Benefits
It matters not whether or not the 'heterosexual community' cares to acknowledges our relationships anymore than it matters to non-Catholics that the Catholic Church does not acknowledge their marriages. It is about equality and civil protections, not social acceptance, which almost all are missing.
To those who keep arguing that 'the damn gubermint don't have no business in our marriages', I ask you this. Let's say you are married and your spouse's family just hates you. Now let's say that your spouse get very sick or critically injured and can no longer make decisions for themselves. Do you want the in-laws to have the power to swoop in, deny you visitation rights, deny you the right to make medical decisions for your spouse's care, take half of the stuff your and your spouse own, and forbid you to even attend your spouse's funeral because you do not have the protections provided by 'the damn gubermint'? Happens to gay people everyday. I know, I've seen it firsthand. Now do you see why we want equality?
Originally posted by A Fortiori
I am a Christian. I believe that the Lord Jesus Christ is my personal Savior, I love and hold him dear to my heart. I believe he died on the cross for my terrible sins, and he healed my broken soul.
I have made myself quite clear on this that I am a follower of Jesus the Christ, the Messiah. I am not a Jew, nor am I a follower of Paul of Tarsus. I see the Gospels as Truth, and they are our instruction for living a righteous life. Most Christians prefer to select cafeteria style from the Jewish Law (as seen in the Hebrew Bible) and the writings of Paul, and would be horrified if themselves subjected tho the whole of it.
No pepperoni and cheese pizza, no women in church, no haircuts for the hair above the ears, no shrimp, crab, Sabbath on Fri/Saturday, no work at all on the Sabbath, etc. These are things most Christians set aside in the cafeteria Bible they profess to follow.
The really cool thing, though, is that Jesus told us what we needed to do in the 25th chapter of Matthew and we'd be the sheep among the goats. Take care of the poor, the sick,
and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) and the Gay And Lesbian Advocates AndDefenders (GLAD). In May, 2004, the NGLTF announced a new alliancewith the Woodhull Freedom Foundation (WFF), a sex-ual liberation group that seeks to abolish laws againstprostitution; overturn “age of consent” laws protect-ing children from adult sexual predators; and seeks to legalize homosexual sodomy in public restrooms and parks. The WFF also seeks to ban all abstinence-only sex education materials in our nation’s public schools. According to an NGLTF press release (May 28, 2004),this new NGLTF/WFF coalition will focus first onstudying America’s “archaic” sex laws and will then filelawsuits to have these laws overturned.
The Gay And Lesbian Advocates and Defenders has already successfully overturned a Massachusetts policygoverning how police are to treat homosexuals caughthaving sex in public restroom stalls. The homosexualgroup sued the police for harassment against a homo-sexual male, identified only as John Doe. Doe had beenconvicted in 1998 for lewd sexual conduct in thewoods near a rest area. When police spotted Doe near a public restroom in 1999, they ejected him fromthe park.GLAD claimed the police were unfairly targeting Doefor harassment and violating his constitutional rights. A Middlesex Superior Court judge then issued an injunc-tion barring police from removing Doe from rest areas. www.iswface.org...
Well now you know why creating civil contracts power of attorney etc is there for people like that.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
I am just curious as to why you said, " People like that". It seems by that tone that we the gay community is different from you a hetero male? Now, this is the big question
Why the fighting? Why the treating like another sect of humanity? Are we all not human? Is my love for my husband different from the love you have for your wife?
Is the love I hold for my children different than the love you give to yours?
I would like to think not, since love is universal, I assume we all speak the same dialect of love.
Yes you are correct when you say that there are different avenues that gay couple can take to make sure these rights are afforded. Civil contracts and such and such. But why are we subjected to such a long, strenuous and costly approach to our rights when you all receive them simply by saying I do?
As for the argument that single folk don't have those, yes they do. They don't need to care for anybody else but themselves, so they make all the decisions. The people closest to them make the decisions when they cannot.
The same goes for gay couples, they should be able to make those decisions for their partner, since they are the ones who love and care for one another.
These rights are about couples, let's not start bringing single people into the fray, that's a whole other ball game.
There is no right side on this debate, since it's been dragged in mud by us and you for decades now. There will come a point when we will simply be tired of this charade and we will all come to some sort of understanding.
The wonderful thing about us humans is that we are dymanic creatures. We change with the times, as we should for progress is not set in the past but set in the future.
Everyone should be afforded the same rights, the minority and the majority, it is a very simple concept.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by Stylez
Before I even dignify that post with a response, go back and properly credit the quotes you've listed! The first two, at least, are not mine! Do not put the words of some other member as a quote from me, especially when they counter my beliefs and opinions! SHAME ON YOU!!!
STOP right there. The poor and the sick? You don't think homosexuals are sick? I mean overcome by sin, given to it? Not all homosexuals but the ones we are talking to certainly are without conscience
Why do God's people tolerate sin and perversion while the wicked rule over them with pride? It's because many Christians are so weak in their faith and comfortable in their sin that they delight in doing evil because there is no fear of judgment anymore. People today prefer to get their ears tickled at church instead of getting their hearts convicted
"This sensitivity to not offend is a symptom of this hedonistic generation. The last virtue of a wicked society is tolerance. A sinner will throw away all the Bible, but still quote, “Judge not that ye be not judged.” - Michael Pearl
“Professing to be wise, they became fools…who exchanged the TRUTH of God for the lie” – Romans 1:22-24
John 5:43 I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Extremism is in full bloom in our world, and those gays that you listed, are a minority in our group, a group of folks who aren't acting with intelligence or with the purpose of human well being. They are selfish.
The larger majority of us are not. As I said, extremism is extremism and making generalisations like you did above is not accurate in this type of debate.
~Keeper
[edit on 9/4/2009 by tothetenthpower]
Originally posted by oneclickaway
Is that so? Sick and without conscience....hmmm....maybe time to look in the mirror, as what people scream the loudest about is often something they cannot integrate...or just an outlet for extreme anger and hatred at the world in general.
I see no love. I see no empathy. I see no compassion. I see no christian spirit in any of your posts. Just strange twisted logic and an outpouring of bile.
And yet you talk of sickness and lack of conscience. Hmmm.