reply to post by Solomons
"letting the military do what it does best" actually mean?
I believe any military, not just ours, main objective when called upon is to create a living hell for the enemy in the drive for victory. They are not
there to be a police force, they are not there to win hearts and minds. They are there to achieve their objective as promptly as possible with the
least casualties.
How can they win hearts and minds when they are killing relatives of the hearts and minds they are trying to win over?
How can they police an area when the supposed enemy can blend right in?
I am not a warmonger nor am I a peace activist. I just believe the military should be used as a last result to achieve an objective as quickly as
possible an withdraw just as fast.
Bush goal in Afghanistan was to get rid of the Taliban and go after members of Alqeada. They accomplished that. Immediately after that they should
have properly trained the Afghans to take over and defend themselves. This is when our military should have left.
After we left, it would be up to Afghanistan to decide what was best for their country.
Instead, we are still training the Afghans, we are trying to win hearts and minds, playing cat and mouse with the Taliban, etc.
The longer we prolong or escalate this war, the more losses we will see on all sides.
|