posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 05:10 AM
reply to post by AnthraAndromda
I did not and still do not feel it has any bearing on what I was trying to communicate. What I'm doing currently is not of a spiritual nature,
and such connections (spiritual and religious) have no place in a political discussion.
Your being a follower of Crowley is the crux
of this thread. And the fact that you’ve decided to keep it under your hat is patent, cynical
misdirection. Prove to me, in decent discussion, that it is not.
You have drawn people in to a dialogue that they are completely unaware is founded on occult writings
State that it is openly
and watch those who are questioning you with a genuine mind to learn fall away.
That you are spouting Star Trek politics means nothing.
Yes I have avoided it, but, mostly in regards to the Ashtar Command, but this is another subject and is best dealt with later. There was
absolutely no attempt to deny anything.
The Ashtar Command have nothing
to do with Crowley’s teachings, so what do they have to do with this? And once again; the fact that you have
avoided the Crowley/occult connection does not excuse you neglecting to mention it.
No flaw in the logic. And, yes it would be worth intense study. I'm not worried about it being ignored, but there is concern over it being
buried. There are "factions" that would not like this kind of information released to the public.
I’m afraid that there is a gaping hole
in your logic.
Dragging out the old “factions” excuse is hogwash because of this; simple facts: you are posting on ATS – the world’s largest conspiracy
– therefore, by association allowed your IP address to be known, not to mention having posted your photograph; you have posted links to
your own websites
that give not only your personal history, family history, and records of where you worked.
With you now publically saying that you are an alien, how difficult would it be for these “factions” to come knocking on your door with all that
Actually you claimed that I'm a "hoaxer"...can you prove this? [I'm betting not].
Yup, I can. Remember not mentioning Crowley?
Hoax: Something that has been established or accepted by fraudulent means.
You’ve drawn people into a thread that they believe has as its topic one subject, when in reality it is based on something entirely
Prove me wrong.
There is an old human saying; "Religon and politics don't mix". I would prefer to keep it that way. My personal beliefs have no bearing on
That’s a blatant lie. Your personal beliefs have everything
to do with your claims.