posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 02:19 PM
Ding ding ding ding! Yup, my BS meter is bending the needle on BS here. I wonder what this guy's ATS username is? He obviously reads this site (or
one similar) because he just regurgitates all of the predictions coming up lately into one giant mega-prediction a-la John Titor.
Like others said, at least one prediction is in the near future so we will be able to go from 99.9999999% bunk to 100% bunk within 30 days or so.
Now for the devil's advocate in me (the following is purely academic and I am not saying it makes this guy any more 'real'):
For those saying that time travel + 'sorry I am late' are a paradox: It is not. He says that this technology is 'new' to him in his timeframe
and can only get him back to a certain point. Suppose either the technology allows him to go a maximum n
years back, then he is as far back as
he can go and that is not far enough back to give better warning.
Or, suppose that since this technology involves communicating through the internet then it is dependent on our technology today to receive the signal.
Perhaps whatever requirement to receive the signal was not existent until just recently?
Also, perhaps the time travel in 2012 and his 'new' technology are not the same? Time travel in 2012 may be human or conscious travel which
produces alternate timeline / parallelism whereas his technology gets data back into a linear past therefore allowing him to give information to the
past without creating a new timeline?
Just a few musings since we are on the topic. I hate it when people assume they know all of the logical truths or paradoxes on time travel and speak
of it as fact when it does not even exist (to us now at least).