It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
Why is civil debate impossible on ATS?
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
I love this site because I learn something new each day.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
([re avatar): I do find it ironic that even though it says "Your problem is obvious", so many are taking it to say "My problem is obvious".
Originally posted by ziggystar60
I guess it IS possible that someone has changed their mind about Obama or Bush or National Health Care in a thread, but to me it seems that people's minds are firmly made up (closed..?) long before they ever enter the discussions.
Originally posted by whaaa
[...] where it really isn't a debate but but slash and burn tactics where education isn't the point but winning at all cost is. Personal attacks and name calling are just part of the strategy.
I call it the "People like you" mind set/ideology.
Reading the article, and especially the comments of Abba Eban, a former Israeli Ambassador to the U.N., I wondered why it was that pro Israel debaters were so successful. And not only the article, but the comments posted after it here make instructive reading -- and actually led me to an answer.
Albert, December 9, 2006 12:27 PM wrote:
There has been also no such comparable situation to a living President having to introduce in a LA times editorial, the reality of what we are not getting in most of the press - the fact there are few Universities inviting him in, he is being blacklisted. A Nobel Prize really goes far nowadays, unless you speak against the reality of what is going on in regards to Israel and Apartheid Policies.
Earlier in the same comment, Albert had written:
The hysteric, over-the-top comments you've received [referring to another commentor, Bill Pearlman] are wonderful for saving with this file together, for several classroom teaching purposes. And we do use these, believe me.
The comments, the nature of their language and intentions, just hammer the point home as to why we Americans are tired of Israel, the very real Israeli lobby money forcing itself as the sole center of our political rights.
There has been NO comparable historical situation with a living President actually being called out for treason, because he dares to SPEAK ON A SUBJECT! And he disagrees with the power of the Israel lobby.
As I read through the comments, especially those by "Bill Pearlman" (not reproduced here because of their scurillity), it struck me that I had heard similar pro-Israel arguments before; and that the responses were equally stereotyped and mechanically reflex-like. Almost as if there were some kind of manual being referenced.
Sure enough, further down the thread
Alan December 10, 2006 4:39 PM wrote:
As your Hasbara manual declares, when out of your depth and when exposed as a bigot, it's better to leave quietly.[...]
Not knowing what a "Hasbara manual" was, I Yahoogled, and wound up at SourceWatch here.
which spoke of the existence of -- a "Manual"!! And it wasn't a piece of fluff either -- at 131 pages long, it promises to be my bedtime reading for many weeks to come.
You can find the Manual HERE. The emphases in the passage are mine.
Hasbara Manual, page 32:
Seven Basic Propaganda Devices
Propaganda is used by those who want to communicate in ways that engage the emotions and downplay rationality, in an attempt to promote a certain message. To effectively present Israel to the public, and to counter anti-Israel messages, it is necessary to understand propaganda devices.
This article applies a list of seven propaganda devices to the Israeli situation, and by doing so allows an understanding of some of the ways in which public opinion is fought for in the International arena.
Thus what this manual is explicitly (and revealingly) about is ways to help the user win battles, not to find out the truth of the matter.
The seven basic propaganda devices are:
NAME CALLING
GLITTERING GENERALITY
TRANSFER
TESTIMONIAL
PLAIN FOLKS
FEAR
BANDWAGON
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
I think it comes down to the subject matter Jaxon.
However it's more when people come here with a bias look on a subject, we attempt to educate them, as any friend would do. It scares the crap out of them I think.
I've NEVER used the ignore button as even those people could post something that would change my mind, I simply don't reply to their ignorance when it shows up.
It's hard to not sometimes, but it's getting better as the months go along.
Hopefully this one will be civil eh? .
~Keeper