Should Members of Congress Behave as Trustees or Delegates, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 30-8-2009 @ 12:23 PM by jam321
We have all heard the rants, chants, and yells of Americans, protesters and non-protesters alike, demanding that members of Congress cast their vote according to their Constituents opinion.

Likewise, we have seen many members of Congress go against their Constituents. The first bailout is a prime example of this.

Leads to the question, are members of Congress Trustees or Delegates? Trustee means that a certain member of Congress votes for what he or she thinks is best for the Constituents. Delegate, on the other hand, casts his or her vote based on the voice of his/her constituents.


Political scientists and political philosophers have suggested that representatives can choose to behave as delegates or as trustees. A delegate is a representative who casts votes that are consistent with the desires of the majority of the constituents he or she represents. A trustee, on the other hand, is a representative who casts votes based on what he or she thinks is best. Some members blend both approaches, behaving as a delegate in some instances and as a trustee in others.


www.thisnation.com...

I personally feel that my Representatives should be delegates. I feel that we put them in their position of authority and in return they should work in the interest of we the voters. However, am I correct in my view?

While a delegate could take care of my area's interest, could that interest interfere with what is best for America as a whole? Which area has more priority, America or my district?


Let's analyze what Rep. Massa said about a vote on Healthcare

MASSA: I will vote adamantly against the interests of my district if I actually think what I am doing is going to be helpful.

(inaudible participants' comments regarding the "interests" of the district statement from Mr. Massa)

MASSA: I will vote against their opinion if I actually believe it will help them.


www.washingtontimes.com...


When I first read this, I understood the following:

I will vote adamantly against the interests of my district. I thought the guy was nuts for saying this. Political Suicide if you must.

But in reality, he didn't say that. He added a big IF.

If he believes it will help them. Is he wrong for acting as a trustee and doing what he thinks is best for his district?


Trustees and delegates, or combo of the two, are not the only way members of Congress vote. We also must consider what role the party line vote plays. Many members vote the party line and use their constituent's concerns as justification for their vote.

Are the constituents really the reason for the vote or are the politicians merely picking the party's interest over voter's interest?

And where do the lobbyist fit in when a member of Congress cast his or her vote?



We all must admit that Members of Congress have a tough task of trying to iron out what's best for their district, State, and America on just about every issue they vote on. However, it is a job they signed up for and they were well aware of the challenges from the beginning. What do you expect from your Representatives?


Should your Representatives behave as trustees or delegates? Party Line?


reply posted on 31-8-2009 @ 02:31 PM by kingoftheworld
they are definately delegates.

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Failed US Foreign Policy? Is Ron Paul the Answer? History Says NO!
  Posted 17 days ago with 26 member flags
How gullible do you have to be to think Iran is a threat?
  Posted 17 days ago with 26 member flags
You heard of SOPA and PIPA.Now ACTA! Must read.
  Posted 16 days ago with 25 member flags
On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 14 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 3 days ago with 16 member flags
Lincoln - The tyrannical traitor
  Posted 18 days ago with 12 member flags