posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 02:31 PM
Originally posted by PsykoOps
I'd take this with a very large grain of salt. Eye witness testimony has been proven over and over again to be notoriously unreliable.
What I don't get is how or why would who ever did that NOT have thought it out better? I mean the crash site where wings would have made a wider
impact and not one body found and a few parts that didn't even belong to the aircraft alledhed to have hit it.
Those questions of the many still unanswered, you would think would be enough to get a more serious look into the whole thing.
It really makes me angry and I don't have a place to direct it because I simply don't know who is behind it all. I have my suspicions but that
isn't good enough. I wonder if it will ever be solved in my life time.
Ya know the debunkers were what made this so aggravating, all of them all of a sudden are engineers and scientist's. It was so frustrating to vent
at people who were like, at least to me anyway, deliberatly denying what was so obvious to me when they seemd like the old saying when one needs a
candle to see the sun.