"Study Says World's Stocks Controlled by Select Few"

reply to post by guidanceofthe third kind


"This is the history of man and i kinda stopped caring in middle school because such is our continued existence. "

If you look at the whole picture of what history has tought us about tyrants, you will see that only when The People get fed up and say "I'm not dealing with your $#!^ anymore", there becomes moments of freedom and liberation. If we all just sit back and say "Oh I don't care, that's just how the world works" then we may as well go take place lining up in front of all these fema camps showing up and request our sacrificial fleacings.

Yes, evil seems to allways find a way to slip out and try to mess up the good things in life. But that same evil is allways met at some point with the opposition that allows ALL slaves to be free. If you just sit back and not care, or pretend that it doesn't exist then you are only allowing it to grow and eventually take over.

If good never stands up to evil then evil, by default wins and we can all kiss our arses goodbye. But if good stands up, and doesn't take the bs anymore then we at least keep the balance. Right now it seems to me that the scales are tipped more to the negative side, the evil nature of things. If no one stands up and at least tries to tip the scales back, what then? Evil just wins because we lost our will to fight!?! #%$^ that!!!

When we loose our will to fight, we loose our freedom. Right now we have allowed TPTB to stealth into the scene and take most of the way over. But they do not have complete controll. (If they did they wouldn't be pushing so much harder now then they have before to push their agenda through.) And that is why we must stand up and fight them with every ounce of our beings. Whether the fight is with words and the pushing forth of good and love and justice, or whether this fight is one of bullets and blood and death.

If we just stand back and let them do these things, then weloose by default. But if we at least try to take a stand, not just except that "that's just the way things are", well then we at least have a chance to win all of our freedoms back. And I don't know about you, but I would rather die standing up for what I believe in then go quietly into the night like some little sheep to be snatched away by the blood thirsty wolf.

I may be a simple woman in my beliefs...But I WILL NOT go quietly into the night. Not now, not ever. I'm not going to just sit back and let them win. I will do everything in my power to stop this evil from winning. I only hope that enough of you out there wake up and do the same...

Heres the problem in my opinion.

From the OP to the scientists in the article, to all the world historians, to the "NWO" conspiracy theorists and everyone on this website are all one thing.

Speculators. Not one of us is in that tightly knit ring of people. Therefore how can we know there exact intentions? We cant, but we can certainly speculate...

Just as in every topic on this website, this issue is not in black and white. There is a multitude of issues concerning the world financial markets that lie in that impossible to comprehend gray area.

Usually those who like to entertain the idea of a NWO conspiracy are un-informed and dont have a vast understanding of history. (please, no offence OP)...

Please take into consideration the huge (bigger than in all of history) middle class that exists today... created by those whom are considered the Illuminated "NWO"... This didnt happen strictly by accident, or without plan. It could not have been achieved without the market regulators, "hidden agendas" and other "conspiracies" people like to throw out there.

Am I saying there hasnt been conspiracy? Nell no! There are conspiracies being played out right in front of our eyes! Corruption? Hell yes, but this one of those things that doesnt make a lick of sense to believe there is some small group of people looking to off the very people who give them there extravagent lifestyles and their extremely oevr the top power. It also doesnt make sense for them to want to eliminate the middle class. These things are necessary for "them" to maintain what it is they are desperate to hold on too.

All I am saying when you guys are throwing around your conspiracy theories about the "illuminati" and the "NWO" try to tak an objective stance and consider the whole picture, not just the portrait someone painted in front of you and then trys to blocks your peripheral vision as well...

Do yourself treh favor and read about the last 2000 years of political maneuvering and who, how an dwhen they acme to be in power...World history is fascinating and you will find many conspiracies in play...And I bet you would forget all about the traditional "NWO" theory so many like to postulate on...



[edit on 30-8-2009 by open_eyeballs]

reply to post by Jesus H Christ


you too?

my wife kicks me in the shins anytime i start up...

reply to post by sanchoearlyjones


Sure did. Doesn't say anything regarding what the threads title is about.

You make a claim saying the WORLDS STOCKS are controlled by a select "few"...a few to me means 3, or around that number.

Such outrageous claims backed by inspirational mumbo jumbo with no true connection to your objective, and a study that shows us nothing besides word of mouth.

I would only be falling prey to the same game that your so called oppressors are playing if I believe a word you say.

Believe and do not question.

It is amazing how easy some of you will take someones word when it is in line with your point of view. Speaking generally, I would make a bet many people here would act just like these so called oppressors if put into their shoes at the beginning stages of life. To bad we will never see the results of such a bet.

Anyone got bet's it's these people? Murdoch, Rockefeller, Rothschild anyone?

reply to post by open_eyeballs


If you were to read anything besides these threads then you would have read the books these wack jobs have published about how they want to kill off 80 to 95% of the world population and how Hitler sent fanmail to some of the elites complementing them on their ideas. But hey if all you want to do is heckle with your wife and read blogs all day then i guess all YOU can do is speculate eh??

To the nay sayers,

We all are born with Natural Inalienable Rights. You all have the Right to disagree. I cannot help that, but I refer You to this thread.
In this thread I have Eisenhower, Kennedy, and George H.W. Bush all talking of other entities being in control.

Bush goes as far as outlining His New World Order. Watch, and Listen carefully. There is absolutely no misunderstanding him. He is clear with the intentions of his New World Order.

I also dissected each speech to show important parts.

Beyond that there are 3 articles in this thread with the more important, or pertinent aspects quoted. Read, and learn, or keep Your Natural Inalienable Right to disagree.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by Red Dawn 09

If you were to read anything besides these threads then you would have read the books these wack jobs have published about how they want to kill off 80 to 95% of the world population

First, by all means give an example of such a book. Second, the georgia guidestones everyone is so paranoid about says nothing about killing off everyone but 500 million people. It says for environmental purposes the earths population should be maintained at 500 million...It mentions a few other important messages that could be beneficial to humanity as well...

it is the paranoid people that like to blow things out of context and create panic because of their boring lives...

If you think "they" honestly want to kill off everyone, ask yourself what is delaying their actions? "They" have had ample opportunity during the world wars and ample materials at their exposal to pull off such a feet over the last 80 years. Why has it not been done as of yet...??

But hey if all you want to do is heckle with your wife and read blogs all day then i guess all YOU can do is speculate eh??

What in the hell are you talking about? Do you know? When did I say anything about my wife?

And yes, all I can do is speculate, but apparently with someone as yourself with such wisdom and esoteric knowledge you can inform the rest of us of the "plans" to "dominate the world"...

conspiracy theorists...you are an excellent example as to why they are looked at like crack pots by the rest of the world...

[edit on 30-8-2009 by open_eyeballs]

Originally posted by open_eyeballs
Heres the problem in my opinion.

"...Speculators. Not one of us is in that tightly knit ring of people. Therefore how can we know there exact intentions? We cant, but we can certainly speculate..."

Just speculation here but...

By technicallity, are scientists just speculators? The "proven therories" they have come up with that are tried and true were designed by them originally. So of corse everyone will believe that he who sounds knowlegable must therefore be knowlegable...Right? I mean it's allways easier to just "believe" what this supposedly knowlegable person or that knowlegable person has to say...

When I started seeing all of the different things I was researching pointing in the same direction, I stopped assuming that it was just one persons' speculations and started considering that there might be more to it (the big picture) then just word of mouth.

Are we not given minds so that we may form our own opinions and speculate that which drives our curiosities? If scientists can speculate all day then make up their own formulas to prove themselves right, and no one ever questions them, are they really right? Or are they still just speculating without being questioned?

Last time I checked, I don't have to fit into a tight knit group to form my own opinion based off many different facts that seem to all point in the same general direction...

Like I said...Just a little "speculation"...

reply to post by sanchoearlyjones


I will say that there are certainly people out there with control we have no idea of.

THAT is obvious...

But their intent to me is oblivious, along with the level of influence they truly have.

reply to post by open_eyeballs


Much like i was saying if you read any of the books such as "eugenicks" or Hitlers "Mian Kamph" you would know but as I say its easier to pick apart someones post on a blog than put out any real effort to read a book or do any research of your own. Keep up the good i mean bad work there "balls".

reply to post by FritosBBQTwist

It is amazing how easy some of you will take someones word when it is in line with your point of view.

Oh come on, it's common knowledge that a few rich folks are in control of more than 70% of the world's wealth.

The top 10 billionaires together are worth over 250 billion... That's 250.000 times $1.000.000 while god knows how many people slave away for less than 8 bucks an hour. Oh, and of course those are the public billionaires we're being told about.

$250.000.000.000... shared by ten persons... while 10 million children die each year due to lack of basic healthcare.

So you can nitpick all you want on exactly how many people own how much property and wealth, but I hope people will not dismiss the gist of this topic because of that.

As far as my two cents...:

Capitalism is a funnel that squeezes the masses for the profit of a bunch of parasitical leeches who have done absolutely nothing to 'earn' their disproportionate property. Yet even though many people here on ATS and IRL cannot stand the injustice, they're also usually pretty eager to label alternatives to Capitalism 'communism' - and dismiss it due to the myth of mankind's inherent 'evil nature'...

Or they are under the delusion that as long as we stick to the constitution things will be all right... IMO, it's time to look beyond that piece of paper that did nothing to address the injustice of private property, and investigate the suppressed voices of people such as Pierre Joseph Proudhon.

His book Property is Theft is a classic, but for more recent material concerning alternatives to our current system I'd suggest to have a look here.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/41914ee3ffe0.gif[/atsimg]

reply to post by open_eyeballs


I know this is not a book that you seek, simply an article that was brought to my attention. Maybe this will help clear you, and a few others out there, up on what might be more then just a "conspiracy theory":

The Move to Depopulate the Planet
Stephanie R. Pasco, Infowars, August 27, 2009
It is my intention to give you clips from documents, many from the United Nations that prove there is a plan to depopulate this planet. I will also provide quotes from various people and organizations that further show this agenda is afoot. I pray the guidance of the Lord God Almighty will be with me in this pursuit to warn others of this dark plot against humanity.
Everything written in this paper is easily verifiable. It may take some time and effort, but I took great pains to make this paper as accurate as I possibly could.
The depopulation agenda is based on nature worship, or Gaia worship. In Genesis, God clearly told Adam and Eve, and then Noah and his family to go forth and multiply to fill the earth. Nowhere in the Bible does God rescind that clearly spoken commandment. Therefore man is attempting to supercede the command of the Lord God in heaven: The Creator! I ask you, who knows more about the state of the earth, the created, or the Creator?
The basis for the depopulation agenda is a standard all elitist’s hold dear. This standard is called:
The Hegelian Dialectic:
Problem - Reaction-Solution
Create the Problem Cause a Reaction Offer a Solution
You will see exactly how they have created the problem; caused a reaction so widespread it is really quite impressive how successful they have been; and offered a solution: A deadly solution.
I ask that you please make an attempt to distribute this paper everywhere you possibly can. The time grows short and so many are going to be caught unawares. By getting the word out, you may be able to prevent someone from needless pain and suffering.
William Benton, Assistant U.S. Secretary of State at UNESCO 1946: (UNESCO is the United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization)
“As long as a child breathes the poisoned air of nationalism, education in world-mindedness can produce only precarious results. As we have pointed out, it is frequently the family that infects the child with extreme nationalism. The schools therefore use the means described earlier to combat family attitudes that favor jingoism (nationalism)…we shall presently recognize in nationalism the major obstacle to development of world mindedness. We are at the beginning of a long process of breaking down the walls of national sovereignty. UNESCO must be the pioneer.” (Emphasis mine throughout)

Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, 1991:
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill (this is absolute proof that man made global warming is a fabrication)…. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

Mikhail Gorbachev:
“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”

Aldous Huxley, Brave New World 1946:
“There is, of course, no reason why the new totalitarians should resemble the old. Government by clubs and firing squads, by artificial famine, mass imprisonment and mass deportation, is not merely inhumane (nobody cares much about that nowadays); it is demonstrably inefficient and in an age of advanced technology, inefficiency is the sin against the Holy Ghost.”

Aldous Huxley, Lecture named Population Explosion 1959:
“…Let us ask ourselves what the practical alternatives are as we confront this problem of population growth. One alternative is to do nothing in particular about it and just let things go on as they are…The question is: Are we going to restore the balance in the natural way, which is a brutal and entirely anti-human way, or are we going to restore it in some intelligent, rational, and humane way…Try to increase production as much as possible and at the same time try to re-establish the balance between the birth rate by means less gruesome than those which are used by nature - by intelligent and human methods?…There are colossal difficulties in the way of implementing any large-scale policy of limitation of population; whereas death control is extremely easy under modern circumstances, birth control is extremely difficult. The reason is very simple: death control - the control, for example, of infectious diseases - can be accomplished by a handful of experts and quite a small labour force of unskilled persons and requires a very small capital expenditure.”

Barry Commoner, Making Peace with the Planet:
“There have been ‘triage’ proposals that would condemn whole nations to death through some species of global ‘benign neglect’. There have been schemes for coercing people to curtail their fertility, by physical and legal means that are ominously left unspecified. Now we are told that we must curtail rather than extend our efforts to feed the hungry peoples of the world. Where will it end?” Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 28, 1997, Testimony before Congressional Committee: “There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that’s why this is so important.”
Jacques Cousteau UNESCO Courier 1991:
“In order to save the planet it would be necessary to kill 350,000 people per day.”

Jacques Cousteau, Population: Opposing Viewpoints:
“If we want our precarious endeavor to succeed, we must convince all human beings to participate in our adventure, and we must urgently find solutions to curb the population explosion that has a direct influence on the impoverishment of the less-favoured communities. Otherwise, generalized resentment will beget hatred, and the ugliest genocide imaginable, involving billions of people, will become unavoidable.”
“Uncontrolled population growth and poverty must not be fought from inside, from Europe, from North America, or any nation or group of nations; it must be attacked from the outside - by international agencies helped in the formidable job by competent and totally non-governmental organizations.”
Bertrand Russell, The Impact Of Science On Society 1953
“I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing… War… has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full… The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s… There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population. The first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, and the third that of general misery except for a powerful minority…”

Henry Kissinger, 1978:
“U.S. policy toward the third world should be one of depopulation”

David Rockefeller, 2000:
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”

David Rockefeller: Memoirs 2002 Founder of the CFR:
“We wield over American political and economical institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political structure, one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

David Rockefeller, Co-founder of the Trilateral Commission:
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine & other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plans for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American Case Officer for the State Department’s Office of Population Affairs (OPA) (now the US State Dept. Office of Population Affairs, est. by Henry Kissinger in 1975): “There is a single theme behind all our work -we must reduce population levels,” said Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American case officer for the State Department’s Office of Population Affairs (OPA). “Either they [governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it. “The professionals,” said Ferguson, “aren’t interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons. That sounds nice. We look at resources and environmental constraints. We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population -or else we will have trouble.
“So steps are taken. El Salvador is an example where our failure to lower population by simple means has created the basis for a national security crisis. The government of El Salvador failed to use our programs to lower their population. Now they get a civil war because of it…. There will be dislocation and food shortages. They still have too many people there.” (1981)

Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 28, 1997; Testimony before Congressional Committee:
“And advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.”

Sir Julian Huxley, UNESCO: its Purpose and its Philosophy:
“Political unification in some sort of world government will be required… Even though… any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.” In the early 1950’s, former Communist Joseph Z. Kornfeder expressed the opinion that UNESCO was comparable to a Communist Party agitation and propaganda department. He stated that such a party apparatus ‘handles the strategy and method of getting at the public mind, young and old.’ Huxley would lard the agency with a motley collection of Communists and fellow travelers.
President Richard Nixon believed abortion was necessary as a form of eugenics to prevent interracial breeding
Theodore Roosevelt to Charles B. Davenport, January 3, 1913, Charles B. Davenport Papers, Department of Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.:
“I wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented entirely from breeding; and when the evil nature of these people is sufficiently flagrant, this should be done. Criminals should be sterilized and feebleminded persons forbidden to leave offspring behind them…The emphasis should be laid on getting desirable people to breed…”
Theodore Roosevelt:
“Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind…. Any group of farmers, who permitted their best stock not to breed, and let all the increase come from the worst stock, would be treated as fit inmates for an asylum…. Some day we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty of the good citizens of the right type is to leave his or her blood behind him in the world; and that we have no business to permit the perpetuation of citizens of the wrong type. The great problem of civilization is to secure a relative increase of the valuable as compared with the less valuable or noxious elements in the population… The problem cannot be met unless we give full consideration to the immense influence of heredity…” “I wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented entirely from breeding; and when the evil nature of these people is sufficiently flagrant, this should be done. Criminals should be sterilized and feebleminded persons forbidden to leave offspring behind them… The emphasis should be laid on getting desirable people to breed…”

By Carl Teichrib:
“The Georgia Guidestones, a massive granite edifice planted in the Georgia countryside, contains a list of ten new commandments for Earth’s citizens. The first commandment, and the one which concerns this article, simply states; “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.”

Robert Walker, former chair of PepsiCo and Proctor & Gamble on water:
Water is a gift of nature. Its delivery is not. It must be priced to insure it is used sustainably.
Ted Turner makes the radical statement that, “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal,”
Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood, funded by the Rockefellers) said in her proposed “The American Baby Code”, intended to become law:
“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
This is the woman (Margaret Sanger) whom Hillary Clinton publicly declared she looked up to, during the 2008 presidential debates.
Here is a short list of some advocates of eugenics; Alexander Graham Bell, George Bernard Shaw H. G. Wells, Sidney Webb, William Beveridge, John Maynard Keynes, Margaret Sanger, Marie Stopes, Woodrow Wilson, Theodore Roosevelt, Emile Zola, George Bernard Shaw, John Maynard Keynes, John Harvey Kellogg, Winston Churchill, Linus Pauling, Sidney Webb, Sir Francis Galton, Charles B. Davenport Futurist Barbara Marx Hubbard (who wanted to create a Dept. of Peace):
“Out of the full spectrum of human personality, one-fourth is electing to transcend…One-fourth is ready to so choose, given the example of one other…One-fourth is resistant to election. They are unattracted by life ever evolving. One-fourth is destructive. They are born angry with God…They are defective seeds…There have always been defective seeds. In the past they were permitted to die a ‘natural death’…we, the elders, have been patiently waiting until the very last moment before the quantum transformation, to take action to cut out this corrupted and corrupting element in the body of humanity. It is like watching a cancer grow…Now, as we approach the quantum shift from creature-human to co-creative human-the human who is an inheritor of god-like powers-the destructive one-fourth must be eliminated from the social body. We have no choice, dearly beloveds. Fortunately you, dearly beloveds, are not responsible for this act. We are. We are in charge of God’s selection process for planet Earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death. We come to bring death to those who are unable to know God…the riders of the pale horse are about to pass among you. Grim reapers, they will separate the wheat from the chaff. This is the most painful period in the history of humanity…”
Alexander Haig is quoted referring to the US State Department Office of Population Affairs, which was established by Henry Kissinger in 1975. The title has since been changed to The Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental and Scientific Affairs:
“Accordingly, the Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental and Scientific Affairs has consistently blocked industrialization policies in the Third World, denying developing nation’s access to nuclear energy technology-the policies that would enable countries to sustain a growing population. According to State Department sources, and Ferguson himself, Alexander Haig is a “firm believer” in population control.
Although the above stated quotes should be sufficient to prove that the elitists in power have definite intent to depopulate this planet to what they deem to be a sustainable level. Some will argue these are only opinions and are of no real consequence. I will now move on to providing bits of documentation showing this is a plan that has a worldwide scope of influence.
Most of these documents are at least 10 years old, some older. That however, does not take away from the seriousness of the content. Do not think them invalid due to their age. It takes time to foment plans on such a grand scale. But, if you are honest with yourself you can see glimpses of these things happening today.
I am going to cover some issues stemming from the UN Treaty on Biological Diversity (Agenda 21), which Bill Clinton signed into law in 1993 before it was sent to the U.S. Senate for ratification.
EPA Internal Working Document Ecosystem Management:
“The executive branch should direct federal agencies to evaluate national policies…. in light of international policies and obligations, and to amend national policies to achieve international objectives.”
“In other words, our federal bureaucrats are writing U.S. law, independent of Congress who has Constitutional authority to do that. They are changing regulations and creating laws out of thin air.”
“They are no longer working for the people of the United States. They are working for the international community. There are so many treaties written up that they have (effectively) bound the United States. Whereas a few of the treaties were not a problem, the abundance (100’s) of them have now taken control over all of our lives” -Michael Coffman

UN Treaty on Biological Diversity Assessment on Desirable Culture:
“…Traditional societies have considered certain sites as sacred, where most human activities are prohibited.”
That is the heart of the Convention on Biodiversity. Locking up nearly 50% of the land area of the United States is their idea of protecting biological diversity. -Michael Coffman

UN Treaty on Biodiversity Diversity Usage of Fertilizers Not Sustainable:
“That fertilizers have played an essential part in producing the world’s harvests is undisputed. (It) is estimated that if the use of fertilizers ceased, the world’s harvests would be cut almost in half. However, the negative side of the equation is that the nitrates from fertilizers seep into ground water aquifers and they are seriously implicated in the eutrophication of lakes, rivers and coastal ecosystems causing often drastic changes in the fauna and flora.”
“They are willing to take a course of action that will reduce the world’s food supply by half, or more, as they will likely reduce the use of pesticides knowing full well how many people this will kill”. -Michael Coffman

UN Biodiversity Assessment on Sustainable Human Population; US Senate September 9, 1994:
“A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be one billion people. This must be implemented within 30-50 years, 2/3’s of the population must be cut.”
“The UN says property rights are not absolute and unchanging, but are there for the convenience of whatever government wants to do.” - Michael Coffman
“Nobody owns biodiversity, so everything we do impinges on biodiversity. Property rights become meaningless. At the Rio De Janeiro Summit it was decided that the Global Environmental Facility would be the depository of all property rights.” - Michael Coffman

UN Biodiversity Assessment The Worldview of Western Civilization Section 12.2.3, Page 835:
The western “worldview is characteristic of large-scale societies, heavily dependent on resources brought from considerable distances. It is a worldview that is characterized by the denial of sacred attributes of nature… (which) became firmly established about 2000 years (ago) with the Judeo-Christian-Islamic religious traditions.”
This same treaty considers rocks to be living beings on an equal plane with human beings. Rocks, many believe, will reincarnate into lower life forms; and gradually into human beings.

Bureau of Land Management Internal Working Document
Human Dimensions of Ecosystem Management Objective/Purpose: “All ecosystem management activities should consider human beings as biological resources…” (Reminiscent of Soylent Green)
This document was brought before Congress. This statement created such an uproar that it was removed. Regardless of its removal, it still serves to prove the mindset of these people; and just because this was removed from a document it does not mean it was removed from the thoughts and the intended goals of those who penned it; or who believe it.
“For the elite to be able to have management of the ecosystem, humans would have no more value than a rock.” - Michael Coffman
UN Biodiversity Treaty UN Global Biological Assessment Sustainable Human Populations:
“Population growth has exceeded the capacity of the biosphere” (i.e. the earth) “It is estimated that an ‘agricultural world’ in which most human beings are peasants should be able to support 5 to 7 billion people.”
Now I feel is an appropriate time to cover some other areas of government, as well as private organizations that would like to see the population of the world decrease at an astounding rate (up to 90%). This is a dark, bloody agenda that will cause terrible hardship and pain upon millions of people.
World Wildlife Fund, World Resources Institute International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN):
The IUCN involves the EPA, US Fish & Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, the United States Forest Service, Sierra Club, the Nature Conservancy, the National Wildlife Fund, the National Audubon Society, National Resources Defense Council, UNESCO, the Environmental Defense Fund, the U.N. Environmental Program, etc. .
IUCN 1992
Covenant On the Environment and Development: “Eventually a wilderness network would dominate a region and thus would itself constitute the matrix, with human habitations being the islands. The remaining half of the US would be used as buffer zones.”
“The night before this treaty was ratified, Senator Mitchell withdrew it from the calendar and it was never voted on. It took four men, devoted to God in prayer to stop this treaty. The treaty still waits in the wings. Upon ratification, the US will have no ability to protect its own citizens.” -Michael Coffman
Henry Kissinger had a similar plan to use food as a weapon in 1974, found in the National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests; which was adopted as official policy by then President Gerald Ford in November of 1975. This Memorandum outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in lesser-developed countries by means of birth control, and implicitly, war and famine. Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as National Security Advisor, (the same post Scowcroft held in the Bush Administration), was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George H.W. Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the Secretaries of State, Treasury, Defense and Agriculture.
This document has never been renounced, only certain portions have been amended, leaving it as the foundational document on population control issued in the U.S. Government.
The major players in the founding of this document are as follows:
Henry Kissinger Richard Nixon Margaret Sanger Paul Ehrlich Werner Fornos Timothy Wirth The United Nations Population Fund The United States Agency for International Development Planned Parenthood Federation of America International Planned Parenthood Federation The Club of Rome UNICEF WHO United Nations World Bank
The document can be read here in its entirety, along with the other organizations and individuals complicit in this abomination:
www.usmutes.com/NSSM200.htm
Let it be noted that Adolph Hitler also used food as weapon, stating that food is “a beautiful instrument…for maneuvering and disciplining the masses.” Food has been used as a weapon of war for centuries. Why then would it be outrageous for the elite to use food as a weapon, both a physical and a psychological weapon, in a declared war on overpopulation? It would not be outrageous at all. As has been said time and time again, history repeats itself.
Now we will cover the Earth Charter.
The Earth Charter; A Radical Global Religion, created by Mikhail Gorbachev and Michael Strong: “The Earth Charter initiative reflects the conviction that a radical change in humanity’s attitudes and values is essential to achieve social, economic and ecological well-being in the 21st century… The commission…plans to circulate a final version of the Charter as a People’s Treaty beginning in mid-1998. The Charter will be submitted to the U.N. General Assembly in the year 2000…(where it will) ensure a very strong document that reflects the emerging new global ethics.” This is unprecedented (it is) the first component of an authentic global governance. We are working for dialogue and peace. We are demonstrating our ability to assert control over our fate in a spirit of solidarity to organize our collective sovereignty over this planet, our common heritage.”
The American people were not allowed to see this. Americans as a whole do not want the UN to be the head of a world government. The one thing the majority of this country values, above most everything else, is their freedom. Or the semblance of freedom we have left should I say.
At the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, the Presidential Council on Sustainable Development in 1996 came to the conclusion that the world’s human population should not exceed 500 million people. That is a 93% reduction in population!
According to the UN video, “Armed to the Teeth”; and also in the Freedom From War Policy -put into effect by JFK in 1961-general and complete disarmament and US military power was given over, in full, to the UN. This is a loss of the sovereignty of America. (Read this document at www.scribd.com/doc/5009662/Freedom www.scribd.com/doc/5009662 From-War www.scribd.com/doc/5009662).
The Earth Charter (1992), A Spiritual Vision: “A consensus has developed that the Earth Charter should be…the articulation of a spiritual vision that reflects universal spiritual values, including, but not limited to, ethical values …a people’s charter that serves as a universal code of conduct for ordinary citizens, educators, business executives, scientists, religious leaders, non-governmental organizers and national councils of sustainable development; and a declaration of principles that can serve as a “soft tax” document when endorsed by the UN General Assembly. ”
In its original form, The Earth Charter failed miserably due to open, blatant pantheistic approach. Gorbachev and Strong have worked diligently to change the language and make it appear less obvious. You may be wondering what the Earth Charter has to do with depopulation. It has everything to do with it. Here is a very brief synopsis of what the Charter holds for us.
According to the Charter, we must:
* “Recognize that all beings are interdependent and every form of life has value…” (Unborn children, of course, are not included in the UN’s definition of “every form of life.” The Earth Summit II documents continue to support the UN’s pro-abortion policies.)
* “Affirm faith in the inherent dignity of all human beings.” (UN agencies, however, support policies of euthanasia for those determined not capable of living a “quality” life.)
* “Adopt at all levels sustainable development plans and regulations….” (This is a prescription for global socialism in a super-regulated global state.)
* “Prevent pollution of any part of the environment…” (Enforcing this dictum would mean stopping virtually all human activity.)
* “Internalize the full environmental and social costs of goods and services in the selling price.” (This seemingly harmless sentence would empower the state to price, tax, and regulate all production and consumption.)
* “Ensure universal access to health care that fosters reproductive health and responsible reproduction. (This is a thinly disguised call for that includes abortion and population control.)
* “Eliminate discrimination in all its forms, such as that based on race … [and] sexual orientation.” (This provision is clearly aimed at criminalizing those who refuse to accept homosexuality as positive and good.)
* “Promote the equitable distribution of wealth within nations and among nations. (See; www.thefreelibrary.com for the full article)
The Earth Charter has not been ratified. Do not make the mistake of assuming it has not been interwoven into our society, however! It is being taught in our schools and promoted shamelessly by Hollywood, the UN, NBC (owned by GE), ABC, CBS, CNN, HLN & all the Fox owned stations, with the exception of Fox News in order to keep the supporters blinded to the machinations of Rupert Murdock. Do not be deceived!
The ability to freely procreate is soon to be removed from us, much as it has been in China for many years. Not only will we not be allowed to have children, anyone who is termed a “useless eater” (A term coined by Henry Kissinger) will be euthanized: Mercilessly culled.
In Sweden , the “Sterilization Act of 1934″ provided for the voluntary sterilization of some mental patients. The law was passed while the Swedish Social Democratic Party was in power, though it was also supported by all other political parties in Parliament at the time, as well as the Lutheran Church and much of the medical profession. -Wikipedia
America is scheduled to become compliant to Codex Alimentarius (CA) as of December 31, 2009.
Codex Alimentarius is going to regulate virtually anything that you put into your mouth that is not a pharmaceutical. The World Trade Organization (WTO) has accepted Codex Alimentarius and any nation that is a member of the WTO must become compliant with CA. In any dispute between 2 countries, the one that is Codex compliant automatically wins. This is quite an incentive for all nations to become compliant. - Rima Laibow
CA guidelines set for vitamins & minerals are said to be voluntary, however, they are scheduled to become mandatory on December 31, 2009. In 1994, Codex Alimentarius declared nutrients to be poisons: See the Dietary Supplement Health Education Act (DSHEA). Yet fluoride is acceptable! Why? It creates complacency. Proper nutrients will ensure a longer, healthier life. Not at all in keeping with a depopulation agenda.
From Esoteric Agenda, a documentary by Ben Stewart:
“In 1962 it was decreed that there would be a move toward total global implementation of Codex Alimentarius. The date set for implementation is December 31, 2009. WHO and FAO are the commissions in charge of CA. They fund it and run it at the request of the U.N.
According to WHO & FAO, epidemiological projections, it is estimated that according to the vitamin and mineral guideline alone; when CA goes into global implementation on December 31, 2009, it will result in a minimum of 3 billion deaths; 1 billion due through starvation. The next 2 billion will die from preventable diseases due to malnutrition.”
“The U.N. has put out dozens of reports calling for an 80% reduction in population (most put the number at 90%). At the 1997 Women’s World Conference in Beijing, the head of the U.N. Food Program said, “We will use food as a weapon against the people.””
In conjunction with Codex Alimentarius, food will be limited and water consumption will be decreased to 10 gallons per day, per person. The average American uses 140 gallons of water every day. The food provided will be Genetically Modified and nutrient deficient.
As of the Codex Alimentarius (CA) implementation date of 12/31/09, if there were a famine anywhere in the world, it will be illegal to send any high nutrient density biscuits. Or to distribute them!!
Once a country becomes CA compliant, CA can never be repealed. Membership with the WTO robs the member nations of any and all sovereignty. Germany is now CA compliant.
Codex Alimentarius goes hand in hand with Agenda 21 and the Kyoto Treaty. The deadline to implement both Agenda 21 and the Kyoto Treaty is 2012.” (Rima Laibow)
Agenda 21 was birthed out of the Rio Summit 1992. Agenda 21 (A 21), a.k.a. Smart Growth, Regionalism, Visioning Processes, Action Plans, Shared Values; 20/20, Best Practices; Community Festivals & Public/Private Partnerships. These are the names you will hear A 21 called, the buzzwords.
Every county must set up a council to oversee the implementation of A 21. A 21 is Sustainable Development. Steven Rockefeller set up the Earth Charter, referenced above. The Earth Charter is the new One World Religion: Earth worship. The earth is considered to be ‘sacred’, and its protection is a ‘sacred trust’. Global responsibility will demand basic changes in values, behaviors and attitudes of government, the private sector, and civil society.
Under Sustainable Development man is considered to be responsible for the pollution of the planet and is subordinate to all other living creatures. This is a direct contradiction to the Bible where God placed man in a position of dominance over the entire earth. The elite will worship and serve the creature, rather than the Creator.
“The environmental agenda is a spiritual agenda with earth worship at its root. As such, the following practices are all considered to be unsustainable: Fossil fuels, artificial fertilizers, modern systems of agricultural production, irrigation water, herbicides, pesticides, farmland, pastures, grazing of livestock, consumerism, dietary habits, salt, sugar, private property, paved roads, dams, reservoirs, logging activities, fencing of pastures”. - Joan Peros
“Every environmental resource must be measured. What can be measured can be managed under the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Project.” - Joan Peros
Among the things considered to be unsustainable, as listed above, these are included: Monotheism and the family unit. The health care plan of President Obama is under A 21. Under this health care plan, the family unit is very much being attacked. Anyone over age 65 must undergo ‘end of life counseling’ by their doctor every 5 years. Abortion will be pushed that much harder, especially with the Science Czar wanting sterilants put into our water supply! One of the new appointee’s to the Obama Administration once said in a book he co-wrote that a child could be killed up to the age of 2 years old! What kind of a monster could think that is acceptable?
Nearly the exact language used to define Sustainable Development was taken from the 1977 Soviet Constitution!
The Family Dependency Ratio, under the United Nations, will look at every household. They will gauge what that household has produced in accordance with what it has used (i.e., resources) by the water bills, energy bills, etc. Are you using more than you are producing? Are you adding to the collective, or merely taking away? This is how the powers that be will determine whether you are a productive citizen, or, in the words of Henry Kissinger, “A useless eater”.
In 1990, Prince Charles formed The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum to bring together 50-60 of the world’s topmost multi-national/transnational corporations to start buying up governments around the world. This is Public/Private Partnerships: This is the very definition of fascism.
I must stop here. At the rate things are now moving, I could add to this daily. But, December 31 is not so far away now, only 4 months. I must get this out now. Time is short.
If you find this to be worthy, please, spread it everywhere you can. Email it, blog it, post it on forums; mail it. Do what you must. People are asleep. They must be woken up. Forced immunizations are right around the corner. These things will come to pass. It is our job to warn people. Please, I ask you, warn them.

reply to post by Psynarchist


My main concern in any governmental form is of the Power Of The People. As long as each individual has the Right to refuse I have no concern over the form of Government.

On that note, I'll bring a sure controversy into this discussion. Che Guevara, believed in socialism, but he also believed the only way a just government could exist is through a completely armed populace.........needless to say with his views he was always run out of where ever he helped, and was exterminated by the CIA in Bolivia. They tortured him to death, and tried to make it look like he was simply executed, but not the case.

As far as the NWO, Elite, and Power Brokers I've always been somewhat adamant that there are different groups. The Illuminated Luciferian NWO bunch are extremely strong, or were.

Beyond a shadow of doubt to simply watch the speech I linked of G H W Bush talking about his NWO, should cause alarm that at the very least there are very evil People walking this planet trying to take it over.

reply to post by psychekitty


but that is no longer possible. It is not even about the laws that they have in place to keep us down. There are not enough of us who understand what is happening. "Crackpots" like us have finally been dwindled down to the nub and where can we go? THey have the hearts and minds of everyone else. We are ineffectual and now they dont even need to hunt us as witches or communists. It is our fate to watch as the world burns itself to the ground all the while knowing how long it has been coming.

As they say, resistance is futile but it has only begun to actually come true. And yes, I did lose the will to fight but my choice was under advisement and i trust the advice that I received. The NWO was never about the rich of our planet and its all i know. Everyone loses, not just us. Why fight the wrong side. Because no matter what the human NWO thinks, they are on the wrong side.



[edit on 30-8-2009 by guidanceofthe third kind]

reply to post by psychekitty

Infowars,

nuff said..

Alex jones is the biggest nut job I can think of, maybe besides ferrikhan (sp?)

anytime you wish to source something I think it would be wise to leave his name or anything he is associated with out of the picture...

reply to post by guidanceofthe third kind


No, You must never submit to these quasi Elite. We are truly brothers, and sisters in arms. We must stand up against the NWO. Believe me they are the ones on the run.

Watch this video courtesy of WarrenB.



Wake Up, Stand Up!!!

reply to post by Psynarchist


I agree with you 100%.

I was only dismissing a few bogus back-up points. The OP's point could very well be true, but not for the reasons he listed.

It is a sick world...I always wonder if I have a lot of objects, or nothing at all...

When a 80k salary to some of us sounds good, it is NOTHING compared to some.

Just strange...

Thank you pyschekitty for all that info and saving me a little time showing "eye-balls" that there is more than just the 2 books i could remember off the top. Its quite apparent that the ones in power are looking to kill off 80-95% of the population and have been trying to figure out a quick and easy way to do it...OHHHH wait! Whats this??? Swine-Flu anyone? FEMA Camps and 1 million plus foreign troops on US soil anyone? Gun ban laws so we cant fight back? Floride in our drinking water? Chem trails for our air? MSG and GMO ohh and wait aspertame for our food? Not to mention the vaccines with mercury and squaline! Do i have to go on?

reply to post by sanchoearlyjones


I am not disagreeing with you. in fact, many of the human members of the NWO are pawns in the scheme as well. They will fall to their devices and they believe they will be rulers of what is left but that is not the case. I do get a good laugh out of it but there is no honor among thieves but at the same time the same thieves have no choice to follow their greed to the natural conclusion.