Coverage under Obamacare will require an implantable microchip., page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 140 times


reply posted on 30-8-2009 @ 10:48 AM by marg6043
reply to post by thetruth777


Yes you are right this was first exposed by the Own CEOs of many communications technologies out there that were been interview on CNBC a month ago, they were delighted about the new open frontier that the health care bill was going to offer for their "Technology".

While they were not talking about implantable chips we all know what they stand for.

As the companies that manufacture the new "Technology" expects to be in demand to keep records and up to day communications systems for Doctors, patients and government.

It seems that the CNBC interview didn't ring a bell until you figure out and research who this CEOs were. and what kind of "Technology they manufacture".


reply posted on 30-8-2009 @ 10:58 AM by TravisT
Originally posted by fieryjaguarpaw
If I'm not mistaken, you are the first person in this thread to bring up the bible or revelations.
LOL, have you even read the first page?

For me this is about privacy. It's about control. I'm not the property of the US government. If anything it should be the other way around. We should control them.

It's hard for me to understand how so many miss the big picture when it comes to the topic of implants.

I think bringing up the bible and "religious nuts" is a good way to convince a lot of people that this stuff is crazy talk. That's unfortunate because I think most of us that see what's comming don't see it because of anything in the bible, but because of the realities of the issues.
I would be scared, if this were perhaps the first thousand times I've heard this topic come up, about a multitude of Presidents. Where have you been? Every President before Obama was supposed to "make it mandatory" for everybody in the U.S. to put these chips in their skin. It's been said hundreds of thousands of times. The only thing it creates is fear, and the ONLY time you should be worried, is when it actually starts. Seriously, what is a thread on ATS going to do to stop this, other then create panic for no good reason? So you can "be aware"? Aware of what, cause last time I checked, I was never told I was getting a chip in my skin, and if it were to happen, then I'm sure they have sneakier ways of doing so.

[edit on 30-8-2009 by TravisT]


reply posted on 30-8-2009 @ 11:08 AM by marg6043
reply to post by TravisT


The reasons the can not force the Chip on people is because the testing guinea pigs where our pets, yes the "technology" targeted pets first.

But it was a down fall for the companies, many of the pets that got the first implants developed cancer and tumors in the areas where the chips were implanted.

Then once the manufactures figure how to Fix the problem, they were offering volunteer medical chips for people at a price.

No to much demand for them either, so the only way that they could be able to get mass implants will be if the government makes it obligatory.

I don't think that they will get away with that either.


reply posted on 30-8-2009 @ 11:18 AM by Silcone Synapse
Originally posted by hotrodturbo7
Link to FDA site:

FDA definition of class II device

Doesn't sound like a pacemaker to me



There we have it,straight from the FDA.

From your PDF link:

Class II Special Controls Guidance Document:
Implantable Radiofrequency Transponder
System for Patient Identification and Health
Information


Yeah...of course its a pacemaker,they just call it an "implantable radiofrequency transponder" to make conspiracy theorists get hot under the collar.(sarc)

There we have it folks....the class II device,a Verichip basically.
Still think this classII device is a pacemaker?


reply posted on 30-8-2009 @ 11:21 AM by TravisT
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by TravisT


The reasons the can not force the Chip on people is because the testing guinea pigs where our pets, yes the "technology" targeted pets first.
Any pet that you get form a shelter has to have a chip put into them, or you can't adopt it, and this has been going on for MANY years. My dog has one in her, she's been doing just fine, and is happy as can be.

Where did you hear it gives all animals cancer? Cause form what I understand, they still put these chips into animals on a daily basis, if you want to adopt.

Edit: Ahhhh, they fixed the problem? Hmmm, I never heard of these pet implants giving off cancer.......

[edit on 30-8-2009 by TravisT]


reply posted on 30-8-2009 @ 11:31 AM by elfie
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
Originally posted by hotrodturbo7
Link to FDA site:

FDA definition of class II device

Doesn't sound like a pacemaker to me



There we have it,straight from the FDA.

From your PDF link:

Class II Special Controls Guidance Document:
Implantable Radiofrequency Transponder
System for Patient Identification and Health
Information


Yeah...of course its a pacemaker,they just call it an "implantable radiofrequency transponder" to make conspiracy theorists get hot under the collar.(sarc)

There we have it folks....the class II device,a Verichip basically.
Still think this classII device is a pacemaker?


Be serious, a whole class devoted to a single device? That is the category to which it assigned. There are many Class II devices, not all of which are actually implanted.



reply posted on 30-8-2009 @ 11:35 AM by Silcone Synapse
reply to post by TravisT


Thing is Travis,pets don't have to pay taxes,fill in census forms,vote,use banks/shops,drive cars-so for them the chip is purley for identification when they are lost...

We on the other hand have to do many things where this technology can build up and store a secret "profile" on us without our knowledge.

Anyone who thinks the information contained will just be medical details is mistaken IMO...

Scientists have been melding biometrics with the awesome power of super-computers to a degree that is almost unbelievable. The technology already exists whereby over 3,000 pages of documentation can be stored on the implantable chip, information which can then be accessed by satellite or scanners linked to computers for all manner of purposes, including logging medical records, social security information - even as a replacement for cash. Today, the produce we buy is scanned for barcodes, tomorrow we may pay for our shopping at the checkouts, not with paper and coin, but by simply passing our hands over the scanner and having our accounts debited accordingly.

Technical author Maxwell Longren comments, "Everyone is touting the positive benefits of the implantable biochip. No one to my knowledge, outside of an increasingly uneasy minority, is discussing its destructive capability for abuse and control. In the past, mankind has never learned from the lessons of history. Nothing, I'm afraid, is going to change in the future. "


www.credencegroup.co.uk...

Would you want a black mark and subsequent visit from the feds if you say,refused a particular vaccine/medication,or bought a "subversive" book from a shop?
Want your life insurance policy cancelled because you are accident prone?
Thats where I believe this will be heading,not straight away of course...softly softly does it.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 19 days ago with 277 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 15 days ago with 122 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 18 days ago with 86 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 17 days ago with 83 member flags
10 People Whose Warnings Went Unheeded
  Posted 3 days ago with 77 member flags