It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Not from what I have seen, and I have family in law enforcement and friends. Where I live, if you decide to plead not guilty to a traffic ticket, and miss your court date, they arrest you, even if you have made another appointment for a court appearance. If the police are that busy, then they shouldn't be arresting people for traffic tickets. It is a con. It shouldn't be that hard to get a warrant to search someone's home when the guy is a convicted sex offender on parole, and someone has been kidnapped.
Originally posted by St Vaast
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Another great post from you
You've raised many pertinent issues, as you always do
Thanks for doing so
particularly for raising the 'latch-key' child syndrome resulting from working mothers, resulting from ....
great post
Originally posted by ArMaP
In Portugal they can only leave on parole after half of the sentence has been executed (probably wrong word, but I cannot remember the right one).
Originally posted by poet1b
It is almost as if nutcases like this are freed to prey upon the public in order to keep people paranoid. This clearly was a situation that was completely avoidable in the first place.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
The reality is in 1970 with strong families this could not have happened.
The child would have never been so poorly attended and left in harm's way.
The perpetrator would have never been able to hide the fact he had an underage girl who wasn't his child living in his backyard in tents and a shed.
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
The reality is in 1970 with strong families this could not have happened.
The child would have never been so poorly attended and left in harm's way.
The perpetrator would have never been able to hide the fact he had an underage girl who wasn't his child living in his backyard in tents and a shed.
...those are examples of bs... sexual predators kidnapping kids happened in the 70s and the 60s and the 50s and as far back as you can go... the dugard girl was not "poorly attended and left in harm's way"... her stepfather was watching her walk to the bus stop... no one couldve predicted that a car would suddenly make a uturn and snatch her - not even you in your 1970s perfect world fantasy - and - back then, it was easier to hide kidnapping victims because the ward and june cleaver types just ignored "bad" things in lieu of baking cookies and getting their daily dose of propaganda via the 5o'clock news...
ProtoplasmicTraveler
The reality is in 1970 with strong families this could not have happened.
The child would have never been so poorly attended and left in harm's way.
The perpetrator would have never been able to hide the fact he had an underage girl who wasn't his child living in his backyard in tents and a shed.
Wyn Hawks
...those are examples of bs...
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
You sound just a wee too young, and a wee too resentful to have been there and done that, but hey you are full of great remedies right? You were just about to post one before South Park came on huh?
...kenneth bianchi and angelo buono... their youngest victim was 12...
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by Wyn Hawks
...kenneth bianchi and angelo buono... their youngest victim was 12...
has exactly what to do with a solution?
I asked you specifically
Yeah I can see how being that realistic would be a challenge for those who have no remmedy and always need someone to blame besides themselves.
The reality is when the buck stops here as a parent and the parent can and will be 100% respoonsible to protecting and raising a child then NO they aren't going to get kidnapped on you.
So I am to understand you have no real suggestions or ideas how to prevent things like this from happening?