im assuming that your talking about the time period of the language,so here you go if your talking about how the way a letter sounds when said
referring to the way a certain letter is spoken as if we were talking about past present or future in a sentence then yes somewhat i couldnt say that
i knew it in every language perfectly but hey neither do you.
I never claimed to.
Nice attempt at dissuading the simple fact that makes all the difference when interpreting ancient texts. Or are you suggesting that the texts of the
bible are not so ancient?
wow seriously thats pretty dumb of you to ask because basically what your talking about is how everbody got horrible at speaking and talking
because they stopped learning, much like how most americans are? and if you mean understand, yeah i can understand what an american is saying when
they dont speak proper english, hmmm...
Again another attempt at discrediting a question.
First and foremost, the languages spoken and the so called "lazy" dialects occur when, because of a language's foundation, other languages have
words difficult to pronounce, so they are pronounced with the "drawl" of the language they are being spoken in.
Again rather relevant, because over time, the meaning of those words amy change, because of the mispronunciation.
Awesome spelling and grammar by the way.
well are you aware that alot of the romances have a lot of words in common this is because of latin not french, hmmm.. why french why not latin
buddy i mean seriously thats were all of the names of plants and animals come from right? i mean i could be wrong but i sure as hell no they are not
french.
This is becoming routine now.
Latin is the derivative of a the ROMANCE languages, However because of the french influence in the majority of them have been irrevocably altered.
I guess that the "Norman conquest of 1066" is lost to you.
ever heard of "William the Conqueror" or the "Visigoths between the 5th and 8th century"
Also to denote, that the modern Latin "binomial nomenclature" of plants and animals has anything to do with modern linguistic influence, and not
with modern scientific naming standards is totally ridiculous.
they teach this stuff in highschool were im at you especially learn that knowledge when you take multiple different languages, not seeeming so
smart now huh...
and for being the highest germanic language with french and latin, id say you were wrong and that latin was the highest language except for in the
beginning. IN THE BIBLE. LOL
Learn some spelling and grammar for goodness sakes, or at least take some time to proof read.
Latin is a derivative language as I noted already, it is not the most modern, however it's influence is unmistakable.
And I suggest that you research English a bit more.
"English is a West Germanic language that originated from the Anglo-Frisian and Lower Saxon dialects brought to Britain by Germanic settlers and
Roman auxiliary troops from various parts of what is now northwest Germany and the northern Netherlands[citation needed] in the 5th century"
Modern English is in fact, the most modern form of high German.
I must commend you on your efforts, but I do believe that you know nothing about anything you are talking about.
You may have read a bit on certain things, and because of your ego, think that you know the exact nature of the information you ave acquired.
Your ego is blinding you to the opportunity to actually learn something about the world you live in.
Instead of continuing this scenario with another rebuttal, why don't you actually do some research and come back to us more informed and tell us what
you learned.
Thinking that you know something, and actually being knowledgeable are two different things.
You may find that looking for answers is half the fun.
Another thing, When attempting to convince anyone of anything, it's probably best not to try and make them know how superior you think you are.
I make no claims, I only offer the opportunity to think.
God Bless you brother.
You are going to need it.
I hope you can live up to your user name.
[edit on 8/28/2009 by reticledc]