Sen. Inhofe (R) - Me no read bill - Me against bill, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 16 times


reply posted on 27-8-2009 @ 05:49 PM by mikerussellus
Originally posted by j2000
reply to
post by mikerussellus



I've read it. I do presentations, contracts with lots of legal ease many times a week.
That bill is a complete piece of trial lawyer crap.
It is nothing but back doors, open doors, and redirects.

You sign a contract like that, and I'll have you out of your home, car before dark.

AMEN brother!
I read it and my eyes bled for a week.
So did my liver, but that was for a different reason, I think. . . .


reply posted on 27-8-2009 @ 05:50 PM by j2000
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to
post by JaxonRoberts



HR3200 WAS the final bill. It was the one the House of Representatives voted on. When the senate saw the reaction to wee little folk reading it, they experienced a severe pucker factor and started to create other versions. If this was a rough draft, then why have the final version done in November of LAST YEAR?

What all the debate is on now, is HR3200.



Let me add to your first part.
They voted on it in "Commitee", not on the floor. Just to make that clear for a few.


reply posted on 27-8-2009 @ 05:59 PM by RRconservative
reply to post by JaxonRoberts



Other than tax cuts, name one thing that has come out of Congress that has ever been worthwhile in the last 20 years?

I can't name 1, so the odds are good for voting against.



reply posted on 27-8-2009 @ 06:02 PM by mikerussellus
Originally posted by j2000
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to
post by JaxonRoberts



HR3200 WAS the final bill. It was the one the House of Representatives voted on. When the senate saw the reaction to wee little folk reading it, they experienced a severe pucker factor and started to create other versions. If this was a rough draft, then why have the final version done in November of LAST YEAR?

What all the debate is on now, is HR3200.



Let me add to your first part.
They voted on it in "Commitee", not on the floor. Just to make that clear for a few.


Thank you for that clarification. I was a wee bit shaky on stating that, but I thought it was correct.




reply posted on 27-8-2009 @ 06:54 PM by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by mikerussellus



That was my point. I'm waiting for the squabling and revising to end and a Bill to hit the floor before I waste (I'm assuming that it will suck and be full of 'add-ons') my time reading it. But for an elected Law Maker to not read every stinking version of proposed legislation is utter crap. THAT'S HIS FRAKKIN' JOB!

I also wish that Congress would adopt the KISS method in regards to writing Bills: KEEP IT SIMPLE, STUPID!



reply posted on 27-8-2009 @ 07:20 PM by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by inthesticks



I have a problem with any of them not reading legislation being drafted, regardless of party affiliation. And to make a decision on whether or not to vote on a piece of legislation without reading said legislation... Well, if you or I were to do anything of the such in our own workplaces, we would be fired, and rightfully so!


reply posted on 27-8-2009 @ 08:13 PM by jkm1864
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to
post by RRconservative



So a collective group who has no idea what they are opposing is just fine and dandy with you? We truly do deserve to go the way of the Soviet Union... Into the mists of history!

BEAM ME UP, SCOTTY! THERE IS NO INTELLIGENT LIFE HERE!




Hey Jaxxon I don't have to read the bill to know I am against it. Lets see I am middle class and I work out of country 8 to 9 months a year. I make 100k a year due to all the over time I put in and I make 16.47 an hour. I pay for my own medical and my GF pays for hers. I pay 3.7k a month in taxes to so called support the less fortunate...


So with many things in mind why on earth would I want to pay more in taxes. Oh I guess I am supposed to work 10 months out of country so slobs like You can have the chance to have medical? You and the people that are for this are the same type of people that refuse good paying jobs like mine because You don't want to be away from home or maybe because you can't kick the drug habbit....

So I don't have to read squat to know that I will end up being the real looser in the deal when in reality Your people should be the real loosers.


reply posted on 27-8-2009 @ 09:43 PM by admriker444
reply to post by schrodingers dog



why does he need to read it ?

it doesnt matter what is in there, its unconstitutional. the constitution does not grant the federal govt the power to regulate healthcare

or maybe you havent read the 10th amendment ?


reply posted on 27-8-2009 @ 10:20 PM by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by admriker444



Then Medicare is done. Say goodbye to Grandma and Grandpa! Oh, and their Social Security is done as well! No money, no doctor, no prescriptions...



reply posted on 27-8-2009 @ 10:35 PM by schrodingers dog
Hey, to all you party pimps out there who say "he doesn't have to/need to read it" ...

IT IS HIS FREAKIN JOB

And you're all conveniently focusing on the "read" part ...

He said he doesn't even want to KNOW what's in it!!!

Christ almighty, reopen your civics textbooks, we don't live in a referendum democracy, legislation is not American Idol, or else all bills would go directly to the constituents and we could cut out the middle man. But it's not, so until that changes he might wanna look into it, if he's not too busy getting his ideas from the news as he proclaimed. Some of the greatest decisions this country has ever made were unpopular when they were made, and it took men of courage and leadership to make them who knew it was not the popular thing to do.

But the hell with all that, we're not asking him to be a hero, just to take some time from his very busy scedule looking into it.

And not for nothing, I hate to break this to you, but he doesn't ONLY represent those who voted for him.

He doesn't want to read it ... fine. He wants to push it onto an lackey to give him cliff notes ... whatever. But he doesn't want to know what's in it?

You've got to be freakin' kidding me!

I DON"T CARE if he's a rep or a dem, it is his JOB!!!!!

Those that defend this jackassery, have no respect for anyone but the party that wags them.

And he shows even less respect for those among you who have come to the same conclusion by actually looking into it. If you're backing this action because you agree with his position you are missing the point.

Beyond embarrassing.

[edit on 27 Aug 2009 by schrodingers dog]


reply posted on 27-8-2009 @ 10:52 PM by soldiermom
reply to post by schrodingers dog



It's his JOB to be the voice of his constituents. He knows what's in the bill. When he stated he didn't need to read it, I'm sure he meant it in a way as to relay the fact that it's recycled bullcrap that he's seen before. The whole concept isn't foreign to him.

He represents the people, and the people here, don't want it.

Furthermore, the dems have the majority. Why don't they pass it already??? I think we all know the answer to that one. When it blows up in their face, they'll want someone else to point the finger of blame at. Yes, we put the noose around your neck but the Republicans helped!
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^