It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Military Equipment Guide

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 27 2009 @ 01:30 PM
link   
A fairly extensive guide to hardware being used by the military today. This had domestic and foreign equipment detailed.

Military.com

There must be a link to something similar here, but I couldn't find it. I was surprised to not see any triangular shaped spacecraft though.





[edit on 27-8-2009 by KSPigpen]




posted on Aug, 27 2009 @ 02:20 PM
link   
The triangle craft was long ago and was built for speed to reach
enemy planes.
At one time our radar defense could not detect three of the Russian
new planes.

The pseudo triangle planes we are told about reminds me of all
the Hitler disk planes that did nothing but distract attention from
any saucer development.

Needing a large flat coil made sense to make a round craft but
that is unnecessary as the Belgian Triangle has high flat sides
and bottom and I suppose top as well.



posted on Aug, 27 2009 @ 03:15 PM
link   
reply to post by KSPigpen
 


Hi, There is also Jane's defense weekly, or anything by Jane's. They even have intelligence reports for sale..... You can get their free catalog of services, and it's really spooky what's at Your finger tips. S&F



posted on Aug, 27 2009 @ 09:13 PM
link   
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 


Dude,



At one time our radar defense could not detect three of the Russian
new planes.


which planes might those be?

that might be one of the most rediculous things ive heard



posted on Aug, 27 2009 @ 09:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by punkinworks
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 


Dude,



At one time our radar defense could not detect three of the Russian
new planes.


which planes might those be?

that might be one of the most rediculous things ive heard


i dont remember the numbers, but i believe it was the 2 latest migs that our radar couldnt detect. ill see if i can find which ones.



posted on Aug, 27 2009 @ 09:22 PM
link   
reply to post by 11b1p
 


here it is


By using a plasma generator the aerodynamic characteristics of the aircraft do not suffer which in term means that the payload is increased making it more effective. The use of this technology offers the benefit of not having to carry the payload internally to be able to fool enemy radar. The Sukhoi Su-35 and the MiG-35 (both upgrades of Su-27 and MiG-29) are the first to benefit from this technology.


www.military-heat.com...



posted on Aug, 27 2009 @ 11:47 PM
link   
"Bison, the Bear, and the Muskrat"

Congress rejected the design and they were sold to Russia.



posted on Aug, 28 2009 @ 04:19 AM
link   
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 


OMG

you cant be serious


the bear and bison invisible to radar?

Yah right,
and we sold the designs to the soviets


come on man
be real



posted on Aug, 28 2009 @ 09:21 AM
link   
even if " plasma stealth " makes an airframe radar ` invisible ` the plasma is easily detected by other means - and as its an ACTIVE energy emmitter - its easir to detect than the RCS of most modern airframes

engage ` plasma stealth ` and die



posted on Aug, 28 2009 @ 09:31 AM
link   
The Russian planes flew above the Radar range or other such
reason, not stealthy as we know it, sorry.

That was my understanding.
Or flew above interceptor range.

ED: Guess there must be a congressional record on this somewhere.


ED: See Pentagon Aliens for the "Bison, the Bear, and the Muskrat"
material as the author was on duty in the Air Force and did the
research for this one of his many conspiracy snafus he put in the book.


[edit on 8/28/2009 by TeslaandLyne]

[edit on 8/28/2009 by TeslaandLyne]



posted on Aug, 28 2009 @ 09:43 AM
link   
This plasma stealth thing must arise from UFO stealth if there is such a thing.

UFOs were caught on radar in Washington D.C. and thats it, no more.
But the Mexico sighting and Belgian sighting had radar responses.

The flat triangle construction of the UFO vehicle should be a radar stealth
factor so something is giving them away.

Bright flashing lights or plasma displays are not the stealth but
the electric field that bends light rays.
In a hover without lighting up the air around it proves stealthy to many
a photograph when it shows up in a picture.



posted on Aug, 28 2009 @ 10:30 AM
link   
The Soviet aircraft from what I remember, where bombers. Who flew through NORAD controlled airspace, and were not detected. The report was considered hoax by many, how ever the people of the Senate Intelligence Committee know better.

There was a fairly active thread on the incident, buried no doubt.

Russian/Soviet flights in the vicinity of North America is nothing unheard of, but when they are not trackable that's when attention is drawn.

Not entirely, also check out

Aug 14, 2007
, why practice strategic nuclear bombings? Are those not used any more? Or are the mini nuke theories worth looking into more.

Technology that's what it is all about. Technology espionage is and always has and will be the "in thing".

Thank God for open sources of info, other wise the people would be completely unaware.



[edit spelling]

[edit on 28-8-2009 by ADVISOR]



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 04:27 PM
link   
All three plane types came back to America by defecting pilots.
Lyne was on duty at the time so it got stuck in his way the government
does things we don't know about examples.
Well they were eventually escorted by US planes so the event must
have cooled down quickly.
Some international spy stunt if you ask me.
Still I always liked the Russian designed aircraft.
So different looking.
America has sleek designs and nothing boarding on the freaky.
Which in the case of the Fox Bat interceptor proved superior in
engine air flow design.



posted on Sep, 26 2009 @ 05:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by 11b1p
here it is


By using a plasma generator the aerodynamic characteristics of the aircraft do not suffer which in term means that the payload is increased making it more effective. The use of this technology offers the benefit of not having to carry the payload internally to be able to fool enemy radar. The Sukhoi Su-35 and the MiG-35 (both upgrades of Su-27 and MiG-29) are the first to benefit from this technology.



Oh, the mythical plasma stealth! Is there any evidence whatsoever that plasma stealth exists in operational deployment and is in use, or even close-to-being operationally deployed?

Proposed is not good enough!

Regards



posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 10:34 AM
link   
Sukhoi Su-35 and the MiG-35
en.rian.ru...

Sure the Russians have it so we have to have it.
Plasma stealth does not exist.

Propaganda.
Is someone paying Russia to make planes so American companies
have to do likewise.

Its all international investors up to their old methods.



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join