It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Daniem
So as you see i dont believe that: god does NOT exist.
But im still atheist!?.
So plz dont say that atheism = there is no god\gods
[edit on 28/8/2009 by Daniem]
i dont believe that: god does NOT exist
Originally posted by AceOfAces
People like to believe in something and I accept that. But forcing your beliefs onto someone else is not only wrong but ignorant. Why are there so many athiests today? It shouldn't matter to non-athiests. There's also a fine line between believing and fact. Religion has no fact yet tell that to someone who is involved in a religion and you will be yelled at until the end of time. It's ironic. It's a constant battle from side to side as to whose right.
I respect people's beliefs but I dont respect throwing them into peoples faces and telling them whats right and wrong. Hence why Atheism is considered in all actuality a religion- yet they dont really believe in anything related to a religion. There are different types of atheists and rightfully so. If Scientology can exist and Christianity can exist, then it's only logical that atheism exists.
I dont see what the big fuss is with Athiests- there are other religions too. Whose to say whose right or wrong? No-one knows. It's about time people started thinking for themselves rather than whats been passed on to them or what they've read in a book from thousands of years ago and re-written by man.
Let me blow some minds here...Churches are built by man...yet they are holy? Just like every bible you've ever put your hands on- its been tainted by man. Constant contradictions lead atheists on the path they are on. People need to find the path thats right for them- not simply because you believe they should go a certain way.
You have sensors in your body to let you know when to eat and sleep. There is nothing for needing a religious belief or needing to pray. It is not required for living.
[edit on 8/29/2009 by AceOfAces]
Constant contradictions lead atheists on the path they are on.
How is a bible holy if its 100% printed and manufactured in a factory or from a publishing company? Does that mean I could worship my Maxim magazines?
If Scientology can exist and Christianity can exist, then it's only logical that atheism exists.
To say that idea doesn't exist and if true, it would mean that person by default would have no idea what they are talking about.
Originally posted by Welfhard
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
You agnostics seem to get a rough time of it don't you. People seem to think you're cowardly in not making absolute or even general conclusions of matters that you have no experience of. People seem to think that it has to be one or the other, and that sitting on the fence isn't a valid stance.
Goddangit, I respect your agnosticism.
That being completely "agnostic" is somehow more honorable and respectful than being able to say with confidence Jesus didn't rise to heaven and cure the blind and so forth.
But really, it is a poor argument.
It might be logical to be agnostic, it might even be the best position to take is no position at all but I have to say I respect the atheist for their passion and sheer guts to stand up to an institution like religion whether they are right or wrong, I got to say, it takes a lot more guts to do that then "sit on the fence" .
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
reply to post by Stylez
It might be logical to be agnostic, it might even be the best position to take is no position at all but I have to say I respect the atheist for their passion and sheer guts to stand up to an institution like religion whether they are right or wrong, I got to say, it takes a lot more guts to do that then "sit on the fence" .
oh crap - I thought I was going to get out of here
are you kidding me with this?
your view on all this is no different from badmedias
do you understand why?
and, on the subject of cowardice...say what's you got to say to the person you mean to say it to
[edit on 8/30/2009 by Spiramirabilis]
You suggest it's a valid stance? Ok ON WHAT? What committment to which side of the argument are they so worthy of being given credit as valid when they can simply switch sides depending on which side happens to be winning the argument.
I see most agnostics "chime in" as supporting commentary but they never get their hands dirty, they invariably have an "out" if they need it because they can't be held accountable to any side of an argument so why acknowledge the courage it takes to stand for nothing over the risk and ridicule one has when taking a stand for one side or the other.
VALID STANCE? yeah as long as it comes with a holds harmless clause as an option.
Don't get me wrong, I don't have a thing against people just because they haven't got enough to make a choice and stand up for the choices they make...
...but on the issue of being a valid stance taking any courage is not something you can attribute to someone who hasn't been able to pick what team they are on to even get in the game unless they are a free agent with a by the minute updatable contract but who wants a team mate with that kind of loyalty.
My view happens to be the same one Richard Dawkins has regarding agnostics.
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
philosophy - really a team sport for you - isn't it?
it's not war - there are no sides
not in the realm of ideas - only out here in the real world where money gets made off them and people get killed for them
you and Badmedia - pretty amusing actually
you both assign value to points of view
there's a right and a wrong - and you're either on the right side - or the wrong side
and you know what - you could have addressed me directly - but you didn't - did you?
"Since my post was responding to a comment warfe had made about agnostics, I most certainly did say what I wanted to the person I wanted to say it to. In case you're wondering, I'd have said it to you also without skipping a beat. www.abovetopsecret.com...
so?
meanwhile - this constant battling between "the sides and the squishy creamy center" is still off topic
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
reply to post by Stylez
My view happens to be the same one Richard Dawkins has regarding agnostics.
quit hiding behind Dawkins skirt - say what you mean to say
Originally posted by jvm222
i'm not religious at all but atheists are as ignorant and blind as fundamentalists. They are just like religion, never finding a balance to their reasoning and thus chasing their tail into the abyss!
Hey tough guy I think the macho stuff is kinda silly seeing how you are so safe behind the monitor in your internet anonyimity. So can we dispense with the challenges to masculinity?
I'm thinking you are not old enough to engage me in civil discussions now.
And by the way, I already said exactly what dawkins said to you, I only added him to let you know that prominent atheists think that too. capeche?