It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A question for 9/11 truthers...

page: 4
4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 12:22 AM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 


Not exactly a controlled test, but I will give you a little leeway because of effort.

Now just prove to me they used thermite.

If you can prove to me they used thermite and thermite alone to weld the beams together I will concede that thermite could be a possible source in the taking down of the WTC.

The next step is conducting a controlled expierament.




posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 12:38 AM
link   
reply to post by jd140
 



Now just prove to me they used thermite.



What? What did your eyes see sparkers, used on forth of July?
Come on get a real will you!



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 12:41 AM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 


They could have used gunpowder for effect for all I know.

I said that if you could prove it was thermite then you might be on to something. I am meeting you halfway, all you have to do is meet me in the middle.

Don't get defensive, I'm not saying that you are wrong.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 12:47 AM
link   
reply to post by jd140
 




The next step is conducting a controlled expierament.


Don’t need to, the video I have presented says it all. But if you are not convinced then you need to do some real research into Thermite and Thermate and nano Thermite and learn what it is used for. I have done mine and I am convinced that A super Thermite was used with explosives to bring down the WTC. Professor Steven Jones report on Thermite found in the WTC dust is very credible despite what the government says they have a good reason to ignore it don’t you think?



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 12:52 AM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 


Like I said, meet me in the middle.

Conduct a controlled expierament to show it can be used to cut through I beams.

You could be right, but unless it is shown in a controlled setting it can't be conclusive.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 01:03 AM
link   
reply to post by jd140
 



Thermite weld evaluations and developments: railroads, manufacturers and suppliers continually improve infrastructure products and practices for improved performance and reliability - Ttci R&D

The utility and applicability of thermite welds, as improvements continue, ensures their continued use in the railroad environment, even though field conditions under which they are used may inherently prohibit performance improvements to match that of factory flash-butt welds.


findarticles.com...

This is an excerpt from this source.
I think I have proven to you that Thermite is used in those two videos and Thermite is used to fuse railroad tracks together.



[edit on 3-9-2009 by impressme]



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 01:09 AM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 


Ok I'm done going around and around with you.

When you can show me a controlled expierament U2U me and I will visit the thread you post it in.

Until then I will go back to staying away from this forum.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 01:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by impressme


You know I must be talking to a brick wall!

\
Folks, this is what you call the pot calling the kettle black.

Those of you who have tried to intelligently reason with this guy and his ilk ...is a waste of time.

Lordy, Lordy; how I wish I was a government agent.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 01:13 AM
link   
reply to post by jd140
 


Touché, your back on ignore.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 01:20 AM
link   
Typical of a cult twoofer.

If you ask a reasonable question, they will put you on ignore.

Brave souls these twoofers are.




posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 01:28 AM
link   

Thermite VS., 1/2 Plate steel

www.youtube.com...

Thermite DOES cut through steel.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 01:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Classified Info
 


You lose again.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 01:48 AM
link   
Nope!

Your hatred is what has lost.

You and your ilk fumble all over yourselves making all of you ....jerks.

I have studied this subject for three years.

The Twin Towers were brought down by explosives? All of you nuts bought into it like a carp to a worm but when the FACT came out that it would take months to set this up, your ilk dropped it.

I can go on and on, but I have done that before.

You are either nuts or just a hater.

the facts speak for themselves, and you are on thwe wrong side.

Answer me this twoofer. If the buildings were already riged why the need to fly planes in to them?

You nuts need to get your story straight.



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 07:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by Classified Info
Nope!

Your hatred is what has lost.

You and your ilk fumble all over yourselves making all of you ....jerks.

I have studied this subject for three years.


oh really....and WHAT have YOU studied?

Have you brushed up on BASIC physics?

Have YOU figured out HOW a lady can stand in the impact area, 40 min after impact, HANGING onto the VERY steel that is TOO HOT and past the point of compromise?...only to fail moments later.




The Twin Towers were brought down by explosives? All of you nuts bought into it like a carp to a worm but when the FACT came out that it would take months to set this up, your ilk dropped it.


lol... and...WHY would they use 60 year old technology to do this?

seems to me they would use something like this...explosives nanocomposites

and to imply that they would use 'conventional' means is ignorant



I can go on and on, but I have done that before.

You are either nuts or just a hater.

the facts speak for themselves, and you are on thwe wrong side.

Answer me this twoofer. If the buildings were already riged why the need to fly planes in to them?

You nuts need to get your story straight.


You know what is REALLY pathetic...the Nat.Geo. program that was on 8-31


if THAT is all the official story has....YOU are DOOMED

hmmmm...wonder WHY there is NO mention WTC7 on the 9-11 special?

or NO mention of Bazant's MISCALCULATION of the FORCE needed to PUSH the building down...since, that IS the reason for the NATURAL total global collapse of BOTH towers....

I can go on and on, but I have done that before



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join