List of cancelled military projects, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 26-8-2009 @ 11:40 AM by Conspiracyintheuk
Canadian Forces

Land Forces
Multi-Mission Effects Vehicle

Israel Defense Forces

Aviation
IAI Lavi

Polish Air Force
PZL-230 Skorpion

Royal Air Force
BAC TSR-2

Royal Canadian Air Force

Fighters
Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow

Missiles
Velvet Glove AAM

United States Army Air Corps

Bombers
Huff-Daland XB-1
Douglas Y1B-7
Fokker XB-8
Boeing Y1B-9
Douglas YB-11
Martin XB-13
Martin XB-14
Boeing XB-15
Martin XB-16
Douglas XB-19
Boeing Y1B-20
North American XB-21
Douglas XB-22
Martin XB-27
North American XB-28

Fighters
Douglas XP-48
Lockheed XP-49
Grumman XP-50

United States Army Air Forces

Bombers
Lockheed XB-30
Douglas XB-31
Consolidated B-32 Dominator
XB-33 Super Marauder
Boeing YB-40 Flying Fortress Gunship
Consolidated XB-41 Liberator Gunship

Fighters
Vultee XP-54
Curtiss XP-55 Ascender
Northrop XP-56 Black Bullet
Lockheed XP-58 Chain Lightning
Bell P-59 Airacomet
Curtiss XP-62
McDonnell XP-67 Bat
Republic XP-72
Fisher (General Motors) P-75 Eagle
Bell XP-76
Northrop XP-79
Convair XP-81
Bell XP-83

United States Air Force

Bombers
XB-35
YB-49
XB-70 Valkyrie
B-1A

Fighters
Northrop YA-9
Lockheed YF-12
Republic XF-103
North American F-107
XF-108 Rapier
Bell XF-109
Northrop F-20 Tigershark
Northrop YF-23

United States Navy/United States Marine Corps

Fighters
Grumman XF5F Skyrocket
Goodyear F2G
Douglas A2D Skyshark
A2J Super Savage
F6D Missileer
XF10F Jaguar
General Dynamics F-111B
A-12 Avenger II

United States Army

Small arms
Heckler & Koch XM8
Heckler & Koch XM29 OICW
Heckler & Koch HK CAWS
Special Purpose Individual Weapon
Heckler & Koch G11

Armor
MBT-70

Artillery
XM2001 Crusader
M247 Sergeant York

Aviation
AH-56 Cheyenne
Boeing Vertol YUH-61
Boeing Vertol XCH-62
RAH-66 Comanche
Bell ARH-70

United States Department of Defense
Project Camelot

German Air Force
EWR VJ 101

wikipedia.org

This list is incomplete from the above website

What do you think of these?

[edit on 26/8/2009 by Conspiracyintheuk]


reply posted on 26-8-2009 @ 11:37 PM by mattifikation
reply to post by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi



Nevertheless, that seems to be the U.S.'s strategy. Reviews of our ability to defend against a homeland attack by an aggressor have put us at below 20% readiness to defend the borders. Who needs to fight the individual invaders, when you can threaten to wipe the invading country off the map?

Similarly, our conventional powers frequently come up short when compared to the state of the art stuff being produced by Russia and China (and even Europe.) The ability to keep up is clearly there, but for whatever reasons, the drive is not.

Neither country would ever attack us (or each other, or any other country with a massive nuclear stockpile) outright, nor do I think we would attack them (for the same reason,) so I think our military is just not concerned with fighting a conventional war with them. Otherwise, all of that high-tech stuff they're "working on" right now would be built by now, instead of canceled (or has it been?)

It's not a matter of being too lazy to compare conventional powers. It's a matter of the point being moot. Even a tactical nuclear weapon being used by either side would probably spark nuclear holocaust - "MAD," and all that psychopathy. Since nobody wants to be the ruler of a radioactive wasteland, I just don't see any nuclear powers going to direct war for that reason... at least not the *current* nuclear powers.

Like I said, I think a lot of these projects just get put on the table to provoke a response and make some money for the politicians' golf buddies in the M-I-C.


reply posted on 27-8-2009 @ 12:41 PM by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
reply to post by mattifikation



I agree but at the same time, I also believe that the power and effect of nuclear weapons happens to be very exaggerated. I mean they are indeed much more decisive than conventional weapons, but I doubt they can turn the world into a nuclear wasteland.

I know that radiation is a big deal though, even look at American use of depleted uranium and its mass effects on the Iraqi population. Though I believe if radiation was affecting a large population of the world, humans would learn to adapt to it (it's the only thing we do well).
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Sno-Trains..A short History..(with short video)
  Posted 14 days ago with 16 member flags
Pictures: Civil War Sub H.L. Hunley Finally Revealed
  Posted 8 days ago with 5 member flags
Neuroscience the new face of warfare: experts
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags
Congress Passes Bill That Opens US Skies To Unmanned Drones
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
The Latest in Terminator Tech
  Posted 2 days ago with 3 member flags
U.S. Navy to test 32 megajoule EM Railgun in the coming weeks
  Posted 1 days ago with 3 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Official Maine Caucus Results Thread!!
  2012 US Elections, Posted 7 hours ago, 85 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 69 replies