Ok, I just read an article that supported my statement. Earlier in this thread, Infovacume said this:
"Evolution wuold generate a whole other set of DNA Structers containing new info. "This is extremely lamens turms"
Now, this statement was made in an attempt to differentiate evolution from adaptation. What he was trying to say is that for evolution to exist, new
genes (DNA) would have to be created for it to be evolution. In other words, when we encourage a dog to have certain traits over the years, that does
not change its DNA. So when I speak about the Pug, that is simply not evolution according to him. According to adaptation.
This is a quote from the article I am about to post:
"By analyzing genetic samples from dogs of many shapes and sizes, a Seattle-based research team has shown how a dog’s genes can reveal its
Explain to me, how we are able to see a difference in the genes of a collie, and a Pug (a Pug that was changed by its environment), if the genes did
The last thing I would like to ask you to do is to go back through this an other threads regarding evolution. Pull out all the statements and
descriptions you have made regarding "Adaptation". Then I want you to compare those statements with the information you find in this encyclopedia
article. There is some really interesting information regarding the Lung Fish in here.