1 million sq. ft. UNDERGROUND FACILITY, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times
Topic started on 25-8-2009 @ 05:27 PM by rygi23
This is not nonsense.

What: One million sq. ft. underground facility
Where: Anacostia, Washington D.C.
When: Construction early 2010-early/mid 2012
Why: "Coast Guard Headquarters", yeah right
Who: Dept. of Homeland Security
How: Excavation from side of mound

Satellite locating is simple. Go to Rt. 295/Suitland Pkwy. intersection (overpass). With N pointing up, the woodline under the apartment complex (south of the overpass) is one side of the mound. Structures on top of facility and entire apartment complex are likely to be demolished. Not certain this side will be construction entrance but am assuming. Recently told our local shopping mall is close to that square footage so I'm convinced it's purpose is of a massive scale. Obviously not the typical off-the-beaten-path area for a facility, but nowhere in D.C. is. Multiple levels with top level not far from surface. Entrance visible will not exceed two stories. Inside will be split into corrodores, that large of a wide open space would not support the weight above. The budget for concrete alone is approximately eighty million dollars, while total cost is estimated to be between six and seven hundred million dollars. One company recommended a more efficient excavation from above, government rejected and want it from the side, assuming satellite photograph leaks to be the reason.

This is all I know thus far. I do not presume to know it's real purpose. We've had plenty of places for years for continuity of government (probably many more we still don't know about), so future "civilian" detainment is my best guess for the moment. Not a 12-21-12 "freak", but do think the elite know something we don't. Whether it's astronomical, spiritual, environmental, or economical-something is happening. In my opinion, the timing of the facility's completion is not a coincedence. I do have many things I could be doing with my time, this is not nonsense. Comments and questions very welcome.

If this is my only post, I was paid a visit. Long live liberty and our republic. Long live truth.


reply posted on 25-8-2009 @ 06:04 PM by SharkBait
They have to put all the BS somewhere, Landfills ant takin it anymore!


reply posted on 26-8-2009 @ 02:38 PM by rygi23
Originally posted by flice
What about the internal compartments? How are they devided up.
You say top level wasn't far from surface, would that mean that it isn't a likely shelter to protect anything from something?
1 million sq. ft. doesn't seem like too much.

In comparison, here's 1mill sq foot building in London:



This building is housing 7000 workers, so it probably couldn't fit in too many "decidents"?
There are from 3 to 5 corrodores. By being not far from the surface I meant not a mile down or anything, like a D.U.M.B. 50'-75' was the depth given. 1 million sq. ft. not being much...I worked in a warehouse that was 200K sq. ft. and it was huge. 5 times that underground is hard to imagine. I don't want to nail myself down with specifics and I'm not trying to sound like I know everything about it because I don't. I'm not used to being personally let in on something like this. I'm going what I was told by someone I really trust and has no reason to lie.


reply posted on 26-8-2009 @ 03:42 PM by rygi23
Originally posted by gariac
If this is an announced project, then eh, whatever. If you expect us to believe this will be done in secret, read on....

Well, lets do the math. Assume the underground structure is 12ft tall. Not very tall mind you, but it's a starting point. That is 4 yards tall. One million square feet is 111111 square yards. Multiply by 4 and you get 444444. Since the construction is completely underground, you have to haul all the dirt off site. Using a 100 yard trailer, you get 4444 trips. Think anyone would notice? I do.

Every time someone dreams up these mysterious underground bases, they never consider the scale of the project. We haven't even begun to talk about the concrete pumpers need, steel beams, etc.

Glenn Campbell's blog covered a tunneling project in DC. Closer to reality than this million square foot underground secret base.


Glenn's blog

Glenn, unlike all the armchair investigators, goes to the scene and takes a look. Oh, what a novel idea!
Per my initial post...
1. I never said it's a base.
2. Not secret, military has already given the explanation of "new coast guard headquarters".
3. It's a 2 yr. project with 1 1/2 for excavation, not 1 mo. So even if we use your remedial math, 8 truck loads a day is no problem.
4. I am well aware of the scale of the project, which tells me it's not anything like what it's supposedly being built for. It's scale is dwarfed easily by many similar structures in place for many years.
5. Going to the scene won't show much as construction starts early 2010.
6. I respect your remarks as I'm the type that has to be shown proof. All I can do is truthfully tell what I'm being told by someone whom I hold in the highest regard.


reply posted on 30-8-2009 @ 05:29 PM by gariac
reply to post by rygi23


Nothing remedial about my math. Actually it is generous to your cause since I didn't leave any earth between the so-called underground base and the surface. Increase the dirt by 4 or 5 fold.

The underground base crowd is like the UFO crowd. They want to believe, so they believe. No amount of logic ever convinces them otherwise, hence the big underground base at the Denver airport rumor, Dulce, etc.

Incidentally, it's not a big deal to put part of a building underground when you do construction at the surface. I have plans for building on bases that indicate where the underground portion is located. Or simple tunnels. It is the construction of massive underground facilities that is always suspect. There is always the problem of getting rid of the dirt and of course the structural engineering of expansive areas. If you look at underground mines, they leave some areas uncut to support the ground above.

It makes much more sense to use existing caves or at least construct in the side of a mountain. For one thing, the soil is more suitable.


reply posted on 30-8-2009 @ 06:40 PM by rygi23
Originally posted by gariac
reply to post by rygi23


Nothing remedial about my math. Actually it is generous to your cause since I didn't leave any earth between the so-called underground base and the surface. Increase the dirt by 4 or 5 fold.

The underground base crowd is like the UFO crowd. They want to believe, so they believe. No amount of logic ever convinces them otherwise, hence the big underground base at the Denver airport rumor, Dulce, etc.

Incidentally, it's not a big deal to put part of a building underground when you do construction at the surface. I have plans for building on bases that indicate where the underground portion is located. Or simple tunnels. It is the construction of massive underground facilities that is always suspect. There is always the problem of getting rid of the dirt and of course the structural engineering of expansive areas. If you look at underground mines, they leave some areas uncut to support the ground above.

It makes much more sense to use existing caves or at least construct in the side of a mountain. For one thing, the soil is more suitable.
I don't believe in theories around the Denver Airport or Dulce and am not part of a "crowd". I do believe there are underground facilities we don't know about because their are so many that we do know about. I'm not speculating about something, I am telling you that, whatever it's for, it is being built starting sometime early 2010. I started this thread knowing full well that some would call me a liar because in my opinion the majority of info. on any site like this is questionable to say the least. I think it's best the two of us just left this alone until I post pics .


reply posted on 31-8-2009 @ 12:16 AM by gariac
reply to post by rygi23


But placing these bunkers in mountains or under facilities is exactly how it is done. [Would you seriously build a facility under land you can't control? Your enemies can drill down and spy on you.] Better to run for the basement than to wait for the chopper to take you to the remote location. For off site security, Raven Rock is the classic government bunker.

Raven Rock

What makes this million square foot underground complex even less likely is the Coast Guard is under DHS, and DHS really can't get it's act together. It would be a miracle if DHS could make their phones work, let alone pull off such an operation as this new facility.


reply posted on 31-8-2009 @ 02:04 AM by rygi23
Originally posted by gariac
reply to post by rygi23


But placing these bunkers in mountains or under facilities is exactly how it is done. [Would you seriously build a facility under land you can't control? Your enemies can drill down and spy on you.] Better to run for the basement than to wait for the chopper to take you to the remote location. For off site security, Raven Rock is the classic government bunker.

Raven Rock

What makes this million square foot underground complex even less likely is the Coast Guard is under DHS, and DHS really can't get it's act together. It would be a miracle if DHS could make their phones work, let alone pull off such an operation as this new facility.
Man, I here ya. The location isn't the off-the-beaten-path type. The topography of the land thier is ideal and kind of rare in or around D.C. but other than that I'm stumped. The coast guard argument doesn't make the complex less likely, it makes it less likely that it's for anything having to do with the coast guard, which is really my whole point behind this thread. Finding out now that other people know about it as well has made it almost a certainty to me that this thing is being built. The only question for me is what the heck for. In 5 mos. or so if the surrounding area isn't secured I'll be able to get some pics of whatever, if anything, is going on.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Bob Lear on Brad Meltzers Decoded - UFO\'s
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
Bob Lazar\'s W-2
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
AREA 51 - Activity CAUGHT on (Fact or Faked Paranormal Files Show)
  Posted 19 days ago with 5 member flags
Underground base right in the heart of Portland, OR
  Posted 13 days ago with 5 member flags
"Images of Aviation - Area 51 - Peter Merlin"
  Posted 12 days ago with 4 member flags
Current generation military base video surveillance
  Posted 11 days ago with 4 member flags
Groom Lake night panorama circa 2003
  Posted 8 days ago with 4 member flags
Nellis snooping on social media
  Posted 10 days ago with 3 member flags