POLI: I Went To A Town Hall Meeting In Texas, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 33 times
Topic started on 24-8-2009 @ 01:34 PM by Tentickles
In the news we've seen videos of shouting, angry people at town hall meetings. The media has laid out a picture of almost all town hall meetings being in this fashion. To find out the truth I went to a local meeting myself on August 22nd, hosted by Congressman Pete Olson. He resides over Texas' 22nd Congressional District. This district contains the cities of Rosenberg and La Marque as well as portions of Missouri City and Pearland.

August 24, 2009
Virginia Nicholson


The meeting took place at a local school, in which I attended in my youth, Sartartia Middle School of Fort Bend County in south west Houston. It was held in the largest area of the school the lunch room, positively packed with people. Interesting fact: Fort Bend County’s demographic area happens to be the most varied in the entire United States.

I found it interesting I was one of only a handful of younger people in the audience. Almost the entire group of people who came to attend was older and grayer of hair.

I came for the atmosphere and general feeling of the attendees, the found the entire meeting was a wonderful experience. Everyone was courteous and respectful, at one point Mr. Olson even said, "You can shout at me. I don't mind!"

When the presentation began, Mr. Olson introduced himself with an opening on being respectful to everyone in the audience and hopefully not being mad enough to shout curses. The entire attending crowd clapped in agreement to being civil, courteous and polite.

After the introduction Mr. Olson started to describe his stance on the hottest topic of the day. He says on his website, “The health care delivery system in the United States is in need of reform… I believe the “solution” the Congressional Majority has proposed would be disastrous for Americans and further cripple our economy. It includes an unprecedented expansion of government involvement in health care, including the creation of a government run public option that could result in more than 114 million Americans losing their current health care coverage. The public option allows the government to act as regulator and funder for the public option. This will allow them to set rates for reimbursements and bail out the public option if it fails to compete with its private sector counterparts.” The crowd reacted positively and clapped in agreement with the Congressman’s stance on Healthcare reform.

Mid-speech the Congressman showed this chart:

Booing followed the showing of the chart and Mr. Olson’s agreement with the attendees. Although there was booing, it was neither aggressive nor insulting, just an agreement that the chart is a completely horrible place to start for national health care.

Check out a larger picture of the graph here

The Congressman finished his presentation with an excerpt from the Bill of Rights, “The 10th Amendment is: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” Following the roar of agreement that health care is not for the Federal Government, the Congressman stated that now is not the time for health care reform.

I left feeling rather good about my representative in the House. I agreed with his position on almost all his bullet points and so did the crowd. The entire experience was awesome and I will definitely be going to further town hall meetings in my area to pose questions and show my Texas Pride and Respect.

Pete Olson's standing on the major issues of the day can be found at his website: Congressman Pete Olson's Website

[edit on 2-9-2009 by SkepticOverlord]


reply posted on 24-8-2009 @ 02:29 PM by Tentickles
reply to post by warrenb



It is a horrible graph isnt it?

Makes me want to slap the people who came up with it.


reply posted on 24-8-2009 @ 02:54 PM by Tentickles
reply to post by drsmooth23



I dont even try to understand this graph. I just look at it and go...

No.


reply posted on 24-8-2009 @ 03:24 PM by SpartanKingLeonidas
reply to post by Tentickles



That chart sure looked like something else I have seen before.



Anyone remember Rube Goldberg?

Why is it that the system has to be so inefficient?

I understand checks and balances completely but this is getting a bit redundant if you ask me.

All these Town Hall meetings are doing is distracting the public from the bigger picture.

I have noticed the continual complications that are thrown into these "Town Hall" meetings in that the politician's seem to never know what they are there to speak about, I cannot speak for this Texas one of course.

Does the public not realize that the polician's are not the ones writing these bills?

The medical industry is who writes them, paying lobbyists to buy the politician through legal bribery, and the politician then votes for the laws that butter their bread.

Lobbying

Lobbying is the practice of influencing decisions made by government (in groups or individually).

It includes all attempts to influence legislators and officials, whether by other legislators, constituents, or organized groups.

A lobbyist is a person who tries to influence legislation on behalf of a special interest or a member of a lobby.

Governments often define and regulate organized group lobbying




[edit on 24-8-2009 by SpartanKingLeonidas]


reply posted on 24-8-2009 @ 03:55 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by Tentickles



Makes me want to slap the people who came up with it.


Well then, you should go find Congressman Kevin Brady's staff member who made it!!!

Lower left corner:

Provided by Joint Economic Committee
Republican Staff
Congressman Kevin Brady


The "chart" is a joke, BECAUSE it is BS! Pure and simple. Moree partisan pollution.....


reply posted on 24-8-2009 @ 04:00 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by Tentickles



Are you SURE that AARP 'supports' that chart?

I went to their site, and bring this:

Get the Facts

The debate on health reform is dominating the news these days—as it should. We understand why this issue can create such strong feelings, since every person will be affected by the policy choices that are made.

But much of the debate is being driven by special interests that are deliberately kicking up clouds of dust to obscure the facts. So many people are expressing confusion, skepticism, and even fear about what the Obama administration and members of Congress are proposing.

AARP doesn't want misinformation and fear-mongering to dominate this debate. From allegations about rationing care to wild reports of government-sponsored euthanasia, the rumors just keep getting crazier.

Link

Seems like a very rational, reasoned approach to me......


reply posted on 24-8-2009 @ 04:08 PM by mental modulator
Originally posted by Tentickles
reply to
post by warrenb



It is a horrible graph isnt it?

Makes me want to slap the people who came up with it.


Ah,,, you can't slap the health insurance lobby per say.
But if you find one I will kick him in the nuts for you...


reply posted on 24-8-2009 @ 04:46 PM by truth/seeker
reply to post by questioningall



I agree I don't think they want us to understand it, they want it to look

complicated so people don't know what its about.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



UN Proposes Tax On Americans for 3rd world countries
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Armed bystander stops stabbing outside school
  Posted 12 days ago with 27 member flags
" Climate Change Is Not A Hoax", says Obama!!??
  Posted 4 days ago with 21 member flags
Former Arizona Sheriff Mack, ‘Gun Control Against the Law’
  Posted 13 days ago with 12 member flags
Limiting Freedom & It\'s Effects On Society
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

My rant about my country.... England
  Rant: 8 hours ago, 44 replies
PROOF 9/11/01 was an inside job
  9/11 Conspiracies: 17 hours ago, 35 replies
I have a new Kitten....
  General Chit Chat: 16 hours ago, 26 replies