Originally posted by dragonridr
reply to post by Chevalerous
Your wrong as well so apparently you need to learn some history too. First the the Nazis were fascists so trying to define them by left or right is
silly. Lets look at what they wanted shall we?
The National Socialist Program was developed to formulate the party policies of, first, the Austrian German Workers Party.The program championed the
right to employment and called for the institution of profit sharing, confiscation of war profits, prosecution of usurer's and profiteers,
nationalization of trusts, communalization of department stores, extension of the old-age pension system, creation of a national education program of
all classes, prohibition of child labor, and an end to the dominance of investment capital.German Nazism was closer to Russian communism than to any
other non-communist system.
Now once Hitler got this off the ground next came a dictatorship this is a common end result Venezuela comes to mind.Once the government regulates all
aspects of someones life it inevitably leads to one person controlling every aspect of a persons life. A Nazi would have there jobs picked for them
the education system was set up for the needs of the state and regulated every aspect of the German peoples lives. And currently the government is
saying alot of the same things the Nazis did to gain power.For example banks are evil industry needs to be regulated there needs to be a national
health care system. And what scares the hell out of me is the conditions occurring in the United States is close to the conditions the Germans were
experiencing after world war 1 unemployment rising massive debt and lets not forget isolationism which I'm hearing more and more here.
Was he inaccurate comparing the government policies to Nazis Id argue no there are similarities let us hope it just doesn't go as far as it could.
WTF! are you talking about? - you don't know what you are talking about!
You said: Austrian German Workers Party?
Well that is not correct - it was:
Founded 5th of january 1919 as
Deutsche Arbeiterpartei DAP
Karl Harrer 1919 - DAP
Anton Drexler 1919–1921 - DAP
Adolf Hitler 1921–1945 changed the name to:
Nationalsozialistische
Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP
Austria had nothing to do with it beside Hitler being from Austria.
You're the the one who need a proper education in political history because apparently so many of you have been brainwashed by your own American
Right-Wing (because they didn't want to be associated with National Socialism on the spectrum) into believing that the National Socialism was on the
same side on the political spectrum as Socialism/Communism - they weren't, they were the antithesis of Socialism/Communism - they were the radical
authoritarian RIGHT!
And Communism were the radical authoritan LEFT!
Nazi Germany was the ideological antithesis to Communism. Many of those non-Jewish victims exterminated by the Nazis were guilty of the crime of being
Progressive or Communist. Communists, Socialists, Gypsies, Jews, and Homosexuals were the “enemies” against which the right-extremist Nazis
rallied.
The National Socialist Party (aka the Nazi’s) was “Socialist” in name only. Nazi Germany was a Fascist dictatorship. Communist
is LEFT, Nazis is RIGHT. Both systems have often been commandeered by strong man authoritarian regimes.
I wrote:
One thing is bothering me though! the brave marine in the video said that the National Socialists were LEFTIST! - (A.K.A Socialists &
Communists)
Well that is not correct even if the name can lead you to think so!
They were 'Authoritarian Right Wing' on the political spectrum in Germany, they actually hated the Socialists, Social Democrats and the Communists
and sent most of them to concentration camps.
Why don't we take a look how Hitler himself defined the term: National Socialism? shall we?
Great interviews of the 20th century
This edited interview of Adolf Hitler by George Sylvester Viereck took place in 1923. It was republished in Liberty magazine in July 1932
I met Hitler not in his headquarters, the Brown House in Munich, but in a private home - the dwelling of a former admiral of the German Navy. We
discussed the fate of Germany over the teacups.
"Why," I asked Hitler, "do you call yourself a National Socialist, since your party programme is the very antithesis of that commonly accredited
to socialism?"
"Socialism," he retorted, putting down his cup of tea, pugnaciously, "is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism.
Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists.
"Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal.
Marxism has no right to disguise itself as socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no
negation of personality, and unlike Marxism, it is patriotic.
"We want a greater Germany uniting all German tribes. But our salvation can start in the smallest corner. Even if we had only 10 acres of land and
were determined to defend them with our lives, the 10 acres would become the focus of regeneration. Our workers have two souls: one is German, the
other is Marxian. We must arouse the German soul. We must uproot the canker of Marxism. Marxism and Germanism are antitheses.
"In my scheme of the German state, there will be no room for the alien, no use for the wastrel, for the usurer or speculator, or anyone incapable of
productive work."
The cords on Hitler's forehead stood out threateningly. His voice filled the room. There was a noise at the door. His followers, who always remain
within call, like a bodyguard, reminded the leader of his duty to address a meeting
Hitler gulped down his tea and rose.
www.guardian.co.uk...
What I was arguing against was that the marine in the townhall video said to the politician that the
National Socialists were LEFTIST!
Therefore I said! he should not be saying this because it will make him look like a fool even if the rest of his arguments is correct and valid!
The National Socialists were not LEFTIST! they were the radical authoritarian RIGHT! on the political spectrum in Germany.
So now some could try to twist this any way you want in a perverse political and distorted point of view like the rest of the delusional propagandists
in America with the modus operandi of Limbaugh or O'Reilly!
I don't care anymore! I'm done arguing this subject with people that are indoctrinated so much that the rest of the world is laughing and feel
sincerely sorry for you!
Man! I have now dead relatives who were on the opposite sides in Nazi Germany and actually lived through those crazy years - some of them were
intellectual 'Social Democrats' while the other side of the family were 'National Socialists' a.k.a NAZIS and financial Capitalists and I had the
pleasure to talk with many of them at a big family reunion in Switzerland late 1980's when many of them were 75-90 years old.
I am myself a crazy mix of Swedish/Norwegian-Swiss/German/Dutch Heritage so I have family spread out in all those countries and many of my relatives
were affected by National Socialism in one way or another.
I trust in their experiences!
I like seeing the people's popular uprising! - but get the Nazi fact straight!
[edit on 25-8-2009 by Chevalerous]